Quantcast
Incoming pilot project to take aim at speeding rates on QEII/major highways. - Page 3 - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst ... 2 3
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: Incoming pilot project to take aim at speeding rates on QEII/major highways.

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Valladolid, Spain
    My Ride
    Boeing, Airbus
    Posts
    1,600
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by g-m View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Have you driven elsewhere in Europe? Spain's 130+ seems fine. Germany was great. Nobody obeys speed limits in Europe anyway and it's great
    Spain's limit on autopistas is 120kph but they're far better than maintained than Canadian highways and they don't have to deal with such variable weather conditions (in most places). Spanish drivers are better trained and will slow down when conditions are adverse too, though, so there's common sense that goes along with the "maximum" limit.

    They also have a lot of reductions to 80-100kph for bridges/tunnels/congestion points which are dumb because that's what causes the collision risk (many people don't slow down, though, except for tunnels where there's often radar).

    The other problem is that cars aren't geared well for 120+kph so you're consuming 20% more fuel vs. 100kph and that fuel costs 1.5-2x what it does in Canada - only matters if you care about $ and emissions, though.

    They make the radar systems very clearly marked so yes, a lot of people will drive a lot faster and then slow down at the radar points which also causes collision risks and I find stupid.

    I like where they use point to point systems for dangerous sections (i.e. 12km stretch of curvy road where they check time intervals) but yea, overall I feel safer driving in Spain than in Canada and 120-130kph is fine from a safety perspective when conditions are good.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    Ioniq 5
    Posts
    1,810
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vengie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    QE2 needs to be 4 lanes each way between Calgary and Edm
    City Council: Okay so we voted to reduce one lane in each direction to add bike lanes to QE2.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    537
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    The issues in Leduc exist exclusively outside the enforcement zones. They completely use it as a honey pot, and make the claim it's a "safety zone" or whatever, despite the safety issues existing a full KM upstream of the speed traps. If they gave a single fuck about safety, they'd do their enforcement on traffic travelling TOWARDS the area in question, not on traffic that has already gone through and is now on a perfectly safe triple divided road designed for 130km/h rate of travel.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    7
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Misterman View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The issues in Leduc exist exclusively outside the enforcement zones. They completely use it as a honey pot, and make the claim it's a "safety zone" or whatever, despite the safety issues existing a full KM upstream of the speed traps. If they gave a single fuck about safety, they'd do their enforcement on traffic travelling TOWARDS the area in question, not on traffic that has already gone through and is now on a perfectly safe triple divided road designed for 130km/h rate of travel.
    Agreed, the other thing they could do is ticket the morons leaving the airport & outlet mall where they merge onto the highway towards Edmonton at 40km/h, but that would likely eventually get labeled as being racist

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cowtown
    My Ride
    10' 4Runner SR5
    Posts
    6,373
    Rep Power
    60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by firebane View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Maybe they need to do a study on how those changes really don't do jack shit. Look at the 80 zone heading east out of Calgary. Seldomly do you actually see people doing 80 in that zone and the other side of Chestermere is 80 but people slow down because cops always patrol there.

    Yes you could enforce more but then why reduce the speed if that is the solution?
    Agreed that stretch is fucking painful and no one is doing 80. Same thing on the far west part of Glenmore close to the ring road.
    Ultracrepidarian

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst ... 2 3

Similar Threads

  1. Virginity rates among students by major

    By Graham_A_M in forum Campus Chat
    Replies: 27
    Latest Threads: 09-05-2010, 11:02 PM
  2. Police take aim at drug-impaired drivers - Controversial law

    By urban.one in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 69
    Latest Threads: 11-24-2008, 12:45 AM
  3. Marketing Major vs Management Major

    By Kirbs17 in forum Campus Chat
    Replies: 4
    Latest Threads: 04-19-2006, 10:20 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Latest Threads: 01-05-2004, 02:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •