Truck Vandalized - Let's find the prick.

[revelations]

Originally posted by 01RedDX


To be fair, neither is there direct evidence of the guy making contact with your buddy's vehicle.

I mean it's pretty obvious what happened, but if we're talking legal definition of proof...

It goes beyond a reasonable doubt that the vehicle involved in the traffic incident is the same one and that the occupant exacted their own idea of revenge.

[relyt92]

Originally posted by revelations


It goes beyond a reasonable doubt that the vehicle involved in the traffic incident is the same one and that the occupant exacted their own idea of revenge.

I don't think he's saying they're different individuals, just that the video doesn't actually show him keying the truck, just shows him walking by it.

[01RedDX]

.

[snowcat]

Show the rear camera when he ran him off the road, douchebag.

[LongCity]

Circumstantial evidence.
Also, great seeing two asshole truck driver be dicks to one another.

Edit: Although, both acts very unnecessary and uncalled for.

[16hypen3sp]

Originally posted by snowcat
Show the rear camera when he ran him off the road, douchebag.

Agreed.

Originally posted by revelations
The difference is that one is a criminal act (Wilful damage under $5000) and one is a possible traffic fine.

As stated above, both parties share guilt in precipitation and escalation of the events, and fail a basic intelligence test.

+1. One is the idiot for intentionally cutting the other off. And the other is the idiot for the intentional damage.


Nicely edited video though.

[bjstare]

Originally posted by LongCity
Circumstantial evidence.
Also, great seeing two asshole truck driver be dicks to one another.

Edit: Although, both acts very unnecessary and uncalled for.

Truck guys are gonna truck guy. Nothin to see here.

[rob the knob]

Originally posted by nissanK
Buddies truck got vandalized today.

Honked at a slow left lane driver on Deerfoot. Apparently that gives them the right to damage peoples property.



Friend already contacted Jason with Dashcam Canada to get more exposure.

Let's circulate this and catch this douchbag.

your buddy thinks he is traffic police?

no clear evidence. only two trucks going to same store.

if your buddy acts like this often, maybe lots of people want to key his truck.

your buddy should take lesson to calm down and not be jack ass police pretender

[revelations]

Originally posted by 01RedDX
Exactly, I'm referring to "smoking gun" type of legally admissible hard evidence, it just isn't there. Given that we have video of the road incident that precipitated the action but no video of him actually causing damage means there is solid evidence for exacting street justice, not court justice. What started as an incident on the street between two DBs should be settled on the street. I mean we are all agreeing with InRich on this FFS.

The definition of "beyond a reasonable doubt" gets complicated.
Would a reasonable person - if shown the video without any preamble - have ambiguity as to what happened in this event?

The vandalism victim would claim that :

a) the male was the occupant of the truck of the preceding road rage incident (truck matches make, model and color)
b) the victims truck did not have key marks on the side prior to the male walking past it
c) the victims dash cam would record no other pedestrians passing by the truck in close proximity after they parked

Also, any criminal history of the offender would come into play. If previous convictions, there is a higher chance a judge would side with the complainant.
No its not cut and dry, but with balance of probabilities there is a reasonable chance of conviction for this offender.... IMO ....

[acedia]

Originally posted by snowcat
Show the rear camera when he ran him off the road, douchebag.

Damn, that's what I was going to say.

That was 10 times worse than driving slow in the left lane. He didn't even really hold you up, what the F?

[birdman86]

Originally posted by acedia


Damn, that's what I was going to say.

That was 10 times worse than driving slow in the left lane. He didn't even really hold you up, what the F?

Yup, I completely sympathize with the alleged vandalizer. Aggressively cut off for absolutely no reason other than, probably, doing the speed limit.

Take the damage and next time don't be such a cunt.

[lilmira]

There is being a jerk and there is intentionally doing something to damage someone else' property. They are not exactly on the same level of douchebagness. Let's see if they can catch the guy. It's a lesson for both.

But yeah, chill out, it's not worth it. Most times I don't even look at the driver anymore, I move around when I can and go on home.

[acedia]

The guy keying buddy's truck is an asshole, no doubt, I'm just saying you go around cutting people off and endangering people like that, you're opening yourself up to this kind of crap.

[Tik-Tok]

Originally posted by snowcat
Show the rear camera when he ran him off the road, douchebag.

I'm curious about the entire drive. Although not unlikely, I feel that one cut-off like that wouldn't cause someone to hunt down the truck and key it. I suspect there was a lot more road rage going on that the video doesn't show, by both parties.

[CompletelyNumb]

Too much editing. We'd like to see the front and back cam from the moment of the honk until the parking lot.

If your buddy changed lanes into the other vehicle then he deserved it. If he didn't, show the whole video.

[cloud7]

The plate number looks like HWIROLL (How I roll?). It is fitting for a truck license plate.

[redblack]

This thread backfired on the OP. He probly won't post the rest of the road rage video.

[Disoblige]

Where in this thread does OP even say his buddy has a rear cam? Why are some of you guys assuming he has a rear cam just because he has a front dash cam?

Edit: My bad, watched it to the end and saw the rear cam footage while parked.

[JfuckinC]

Originally posted by Disoblige
Where in this thread does OP even say his buddy has a rear cam? Why are some of you guys assuming he has a rear cam just because he has a front dash cam?

There is a clip from it in the video...

[Strider]

Originally posted by Disoblige
Where in this thread does OP even say his buddy has a rear cam? Why are some of you guys assuming he has a rear cam just because he has a front dash cam?

There's rear cam footage while parked..?