PDA

View Full Version : Hell...



Genjuro
12-18-2006, 09:18 PM
LoL I got this in the mail yesterday...



The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry midterm. The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well.

Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.
One student, however, wrote the following: First we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different relgions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.
This gives 2 possibilities:
1. If Hell expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all HEll breaks loose.
2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
So which is it?
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my freshman year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is, therefore, extinct...leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."

This student received the only "A"

ogpog
12-18-2006, 09:21 PM
heh clever answer:D

marko polo
12-18-2006, 09:23 PM
:rofl:

Genjuro
12-19-2006, 01:59 AM
Found this too:

Proof Heaven is Hotter Than Hell.

The temperature of Heaven can be rather accurately computed. Our authority is Isaiah 30:26, "Moreover, the light of the Moon shall be as the light of the Sun and the light of the Sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days." Thus Heaven receives from the Moon as much radiation as we do from the Sun, and in addition 7*7 (49) times as much as the Earth does from the Sun, or 50 times in all. The light we receive from the Moon is one 1/10,000 of the light we receive from the Sun, so we can ignore that ... The radiation falling on Heaven will heat it to the point where the heat lost by radiation is just equal to the heat received by radiation, i.e., Heaven loses 50 times as much heat as the Earth by radiation. Using the Stefan-Boltzmann law for radiation, (H/E)^4 = 50, where E is the absolute temperature of the earth (300K), gives H as 798K (525C).

The exact temperature of Hell cannot be computed ... [However] Revelations 2:18 says "But the fearful, and unbelieving ... shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone." A lake of molten brimstone means that its temperature must be at or below the boiling point, 444.6C. We have, then, that Heaven, at 525C is hotter than Hell at 445C. -- From "Applied Optics" vol. 11, A14, 1972

dodger97
12-19-2006, 04:21 AM
^^very scientific but not funny as the first post...:thumbsdow

A790
12-19-2006, 08:51 AM
What an interesting solution to that problem.... really makes me wonder how people get these ideas.

Genjuro
12-19-2006, 12:26 PM
^ an imagination.

TimG
12-19-2006, 12:56 PM
Originally posted by Genjuro

Applied Optics vol. 11, A14, 1972

that citation is bogus.

http://ao.osa.org/browse.cfm?journal=9&strVol=,11

also, applied optics is a respected journal that would never publish something like this, let alone the fact that is has absolutely nothing to do with optics.

Lo)2enz0
12-19-2006, 03:23 PM
i thought this was great. i always try to make my teachers laught with my answers. sometimes its a good response...others a just stuck up and give me a C

Whitetiger
12-19-2006, 04:11 PM
:devil: approves this meesage :thumbsup:

nadroj23
12-19-2006, 05:08 PM
lol thats was good especially the last paragraph....

Super_Geo
12-19-2006, 06:03 PM
Originally posted by Genjuro
...
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my freshman year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over.

Only problem is... the explination as stated would mean that hell is neither exothermic or endothermic. The net energy is still the same... only the volume is changing. Therefore, no energy entering or leaving. /nerd ;)

TimG
12-20-2006, 09:49 AM
if you assume that each soul has a non-zero finite mass, then with each soul that enters hell the energy will increase by mc^2

:burnout: