PDA

View Full Version : Corvette ZR1 LS9 inspired by BMW M V10



trev0006
01-10-2008, 07:18 PM
http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/ls9_and_v10.jpg
It used to be that American muscle cars were competing against themselves when it came to power. But rumor has it that, in the case of the Chevrolet ZR-1, the domestic horsepower war has a new international benchmark: the BMW M-division V10.

Word is that "German competition is driving the higher horsepower and torque numbers coming to the Corvette." Chevy engineers said that the new LS9 was created to "match up favorably" with the V10 found in the M5 and M6. The supercharged 6.2-liter LS9 has 620HP and 595 lb-ft of torque, with 535 lb-ft available from 2,600 RPM and a 6,200-RPM redline. The high-revving, naturally aspirated 5.0-liter V10 has 507 HP and 385 lb-ft of torque, and goes all the way up to 8,250-RPM.

It's good to see Chevrolet taking its cues from the best, no matter whether its domestic or international. Especially when it's applied to an engine created with a different philosophy (large-displacement, low-revving grunt) to go in a car with a vastly different purpose than the M5 or M6. BMW's S85 V10 has won at least two International Engine of the Year awards for three years straight, and the LS9 still needs to prove itself. In the mean time, the far more powerful LS9 can gloat that it gets better highway gas mileage: 20 MPG versus. the V10's 17. American ingenuity, +1.

CokerRat
01-11-2008, 12:37 AM
Hmm, hardly seems fair. Maybe Chev oughta wait for BMW to bore it out and put a blower on it.

Bimmer88
01-11-2008, 12:57 AM
I'd still stick with BMW :D

rage2
01-11-2008, 08:36 AM
Originally posted by CokerRat
Hmm, hardly seems fair. Maybe Chev oughta wait for BMW to bore it out and put a blower on it.
How is it not fair? BMW has access to the same technology. The end result is that the LS9 makes more power and is better in terms of fuel economy. High revving doesn't always mean better (except for bench racers).

EK 2.0
01-11-2008, 08:39 AM
Originally posted by rage2

High revving doesn't always mean better (except for bench racers).


present.:D

Kaos
01-11-2008, 09:18 AM
Regardless of who originally had the idea. The LS9 motor is off the hook.
The corvette is the only American car I really like. :thumbsup:

CMW403
01-11-2008, 09:38 PM
Originally posted by CokerRat
Hmm, hardly seems fair. Maybe Chev oughta wait for BMW to bore it out and put a blower on it.

i agree with cokerrat on this one. the extra 1.2 litres gives it 30% more torque which in my opinion is a large number. BMW should produce it in a 5.5

BerserkerCatSplat
01-11-2008, 10:09 PM
I still don't see how it was "inspired" by the BMW engine. They have little or nothing in common, aside from putting out a lot of power. There's a difference between an engine being designed to compete with another engine, and an engine "inspired' by another engine. GM didn't see the BMW motor and suddenly think, "hey, we'll make something like that and then put it in the Corvette! Lots of horsepower, what a great a idea!"

Graham_A_M
01-11-2008, 10:18 PM
Originally posted by rage2

How is it not fair? BMW has access to the same technology. The end result is that the LS9 makes more power and is better in terms of fuel economy. High revving doesn't always mean better (except for bench racers).
And with two less cylinders:thumbsup: