PDA

View Full Version : New engine design?? Check it out



TurboMedic
07-08-2008, 10:58 PM
A small company in Australia has developed a new ICE design that they claim makes more power, weighs less, has lower emissions, and up to doubles the fuel economy of a comparable powered engine!! This is really neat stuff, and I would love to see this get snatched up by a large manufacturer!


Revetec, a little known company from the Gold Coast region of Australia, may be on to something huge: they’ve created an engine that is 50% smaller, 50% lighter, has 50% lower emissions and is cheaper to manufacture than a conventional internal combustion engine of the same horsepower. Oh yeah, did I mention that it doubles the fuel economy too.

What that means is a car like the 2007 Toyota Yaris, which is rated at 40 mpg on the highway, would get 80 mpg with a Revetec engine.

This isn’t some hoax… They have a prototype which has been attached to an actual vehicle and independently tested to substantiate their claims.

In personal communication with Mr. Brad Howell-Smith, the Chairman, Inventor and CAD Designer for Revetec, he says “road tests have estimated that [the engine] uses around 50% less fuel than a conventional engine” and if it were converted to run on diesel, that performance gain could be much higher.

Also, because the engine delivers higher torque, and can perform and operate well at much lower rpm’s than a conventional one, the noise levels are lower.

To illustrate how serious he is, Mr. Howell-Smith said that since 2001 his company has been in touch with the US Military Head of R&D for the Southern Hemisphere on a “regular basis” for the purpose of developing one of their engines for light aircraft.

X4v2 SchematicThe current prototype engine, the X4v2, is what Revetec calls a “controlled combustion engine.” The meat of the engine comprises two counter rotating multilobate cams, which are acted upon by two pairs of diametrically opposed pistons which are rigidly interlinked by connecting rods.

If that sounds like complete gibberish to you, you’re not alone. Which is why I included an animation of the process to the left. A more simplified animation of the general motion of an engine of this sort is also included below.

http://gas2.org/files/2008/06/x4.gif http://gas2.org/files/2008/06/rev_ani.gif


Mr. Howell-Smith said that “if [the engine] uses 50% less fuel given that it has the same top end as a conventional engine, emissions would be reduced by 50% if the bottom end was utilized.”

Revetec AnimationWhat does all that stuff about “bottom end” and “top end” mean? The X4v2 has a huge amount of torque over a much larger range of rpm’s than a conventional internal combustion engine.

If a person were to drive a vehicle fitted with this engine in a non-aggressive fashion and keep the rpm’s at the “bottom end” (meaning no “jack-rabbit” starts) they could expect to see a 50% reduction in emissions.

Alternatively, according to Mr. Howell-Smith, a person could see a 30% reduction in fuel use and a 30% reduction in emissions if they used the full acceleration power of the X4v2 all the time. This would provide a 20% increase in acceleration capabilities.

We could debate about whether or not the internal combustion engine has a place in the future of transportation or whether it’s going to be all-electric or fuel cell or whatever… but in the meantime, Revetec has a product that could revolutionize the the transportation industry now, and provide a much needed large reduction in fuel consumption and emissions.

Just imagine a bunch of 80 mpg Toyota Yarises (Yarisi??) running around all over the place. A little scary, I know, but… an 80 mpg conventional automobile? I must be dreaming, wake me up before I get too excited.



Link to Revetec with ACTUAL photos of the engine!

Discuss!

alpha
07-08-2008, 11:17 PM
A few years ago I was looking for an engine like this one, with its big power to low weight, it was ideal for my application, but this company like the handful of others that have concept engines that are similar in design, had barely made it past the design/prototyping stages, and were making very slow progress.

its good to see they are making some headway these days, if you interested in this engine, you might be interested in the rand cam engine, the dynacam/axial vector engine, and the ox2 engine. all have companies behind them with rotary type designs.

5fivespeed
07-08-2008, 11:20 PM
Kind of seems like an Aircraft Radial Engine design, as the front gear could act as a propellor. I could be wrong though.

Ekliptix
07-08-2008, 11:36 PM
Originally posted by 5fivespeed
Kind of seems like an Aircraft Radial Engine design, as the front gear could act as a propellor. I could be wrong though.
The difference with this is that the opposed pistons are rigidly interlinked by connecting rods. I believe an aircraft engine requires a pin through the connecting rod coupling it to the piston.

5fivespeed
07-09-2008, 01:12 AM
Originally posted by Ekliptix

The difference with this is that the opposed pistons are rigidly interlinked by connecting rods. I believe an aircraft engine requires a pin through the connecting rod coupling it to the piston.

That it does! I remember rebuilding one in SAIT. Now I see the difference, thanks.

Eleanor
07-09-2008, 09:14 AM
Originally posted by TurboMedic
A small company in Australia has developed a new ICE design that they claim makes more power, weighs less, has lower emissions, and up to doubles the fuel economy of a comparable powered engine!!

I heard about this in the sixties, it was called the rotary ;)

Seriously though, there's constantly people that claim they've got the next best I.C.E., and like 99% of the times these claims are total B.S.

Look here: http://www.regtech.com/

Same claims, and you don't hear about them ever again.

SkittleFreak
07-09-2008, 09:24 AM
Whatever happened to the Quasiturbine motor? The new rotary

Ichigo
07-09-2008, 09:56 AM
I wonder how they keep the oil from leaking out of the pistons on the bottom.

5fivespeed
07-09-2008, 08:41 PM
Centrifugal Force?

Thaco
07-09-2008, 08:57 PM
isn't this the same basics as the W engines from VW?

-QA-
07-09-2008, 09:28 PM
I doubt this thing will be 50% more fuel efficient with it's lack of bottom end power...in theory everything works and is more efficient, just like the rotary lol
Cool layout tho, i wonder what the reason is why this hasnt come out yet, looks like a solid design.

Primer_Drift
07-09-2008, 09:34 PM
same shit as the MYT (massive, yet tiny) engine.. just as said above you never hear about them again..
http://www.angellabsllc.com/mytengine.html