S2000 or 350z?

[MMAfighter]

Both these cars are pretty much dirt cheap in the states right now.

Honda Glendale is selling their remaining ap2 s2k's for 15K a piece , below 10,000 miles, and the ap1 are going for 12,000 same price as a Carolla!!!!.

350z 04-06 are going for 18 k or cheaper, dealers didn't state how much miles are on any of them.

Now my question is, which one would be better for the price? I'm leaning towards the s2k for reliability and probably lower milage, but damn....The 350's are too cheap to pass up right now. Which one would you guys take?? BTW to be honest I have yet to test drive the s2k, but test drove the 350 and it's oh so fucking nice (interior kina crappy tho).

[Dumbass17]

i would take the 350z, buuut i haven't been in either car
i just HATE the s2000's, they're...small and girly looking IMO

[nightfx]

I'd get a s2000, would probably be more fun to drive in the city.

Not a fan of 350z's, especially one with no top.

[Skyline_Addict]

if you haven't test driven an s2000 yet, you'll need to do so if you want to be able to compare them.

you'll have your fanbois for both cars posting in this thread as to why their fanboi car is better. i'm an s2000 fanboi, but i'm not going to bother telling you why you should get an s2000 - someone else will do that...and i think you should just go test drive one.

i've driven both cars and can honestly say for me personal, the s2000 gives me way more joy out of the driving experience. and yes, the 350z interior sucks ass.

i have a co-worker who eventually got a 350z when he was looking at possibly getting an s2000 or 350z. he went for the 350z in the end simply because he didn't fit into an s2000. there are lots of reasons people end up choosing one of the other.

p.s can you link me to the websites where you are finding these cars for sale? thanks in advance.

[r0g3r]

wow good prices, I would lean towards the 350z just because it looks sexy :D although s2000s' are pretty nice too. hard choice, but atleast you got a choice lol

[dj_rice]

Although the S2000 is more sleek looking and you will have more of a fun/spirited drive, I'd go for 350z cause I like my cars to have torque

[MMAfighter]

Originally posted by Skyline_Addict
if you haven't test driven an s2000 yet, you'll need to do so if you want to be able to compare them.

you'll have your fanbois for both cars posting in this thread as to why their fanboi car is better. i'm an s2000 fanboi, but i'm not going to bother telling you why you should get an s2000 - someone else will do that...and i think you should just go test drive one.

i've driven both cars and can honestly say for me personal, the s2000 gives me way more joy out of the driving experience. and yes, the 350z interior sucks ass.

i have a co-worker who eventually got a 350z when he was looking at possibly getting an s2000 or 350z. he went for the 350z in the end simply because he didn't fit into an s2000. there are lots of reasons people end up choosing one of the other.

p.s can you link me to the websites where you are finding these cars for sale? thanks in advance.

Thanks for your insight, and all the others who've contributed. Yea I'm going to test drive the S2000 soon, and see if I like it.

Oh as for the websites, I got these prices from the delearships themselves, I'm not sure if they're advertising it online however I can list the dealerships.

Honda Center, Glendale California and Infiniti dealership Torrance, California, 3035 Pacific Coast Highway.


Originally posted by dj_rice
Although the S2000 is more sleek looking and you will have more of a fun/spirited drive, I'd go for 350z cause I like my cars to have torque

True. I'm currently driving an Acura TSX and I know what it's like to drive a car that has no effin torque at all. Handling isn't even that great, and just reminds of another Accord (which it basically is.)

I'm earning to drive something fast and fun!!!

I'll see after I test drive both of them again, and see what each dealer offers me out the door.

[pinoyhero]

I've owned both, the 350Z has more power and is more practical but the S2K is by far the funner car. Drop top, 9K RPM revs and insane handling. Easy choice, S2K

[Jlude]

S2K..

althought the Z is a nice car too.

Just drive both and then make your decision.

[LUDELVR]

Originally posted by pinoyhero
I've owned both, the 350Z has more power and is more practical but the S2K is by far the funner car. Drop top, 9K RPM revs and insane handling. Easy choice, S2K

I'm with you here! I've just taken over an ap1 s2k and my bro has a Z and I've driven both.

The s2k feels like a bloody go car and handles AMAZINGLY!!! You can feel every corner as if it were an extension of your body. It's nimble and responsive in its steering. Very easy to get the rear out too!

The Z has gobs more torque (but oddly enough my turbo lude has WAY more ;) ) It's a bit more practical (but not by much) with regards to storage space and to be honest seats an indvidual a lot more comfortably. Also, I'm a bit choked at the lack of options with the s2k compared to the Z...I mean, I don't even have seat warmers!!!! :banghead:

With regards to performnce in handling, I found that the Z felt a lot heavier and was a bit more difficult to throw around corners. It was also not as maneuverable as the s2k and didn't have the nimble feel but still a fun car to drive in and out of traffic.

I also found that both had HUGE blind spots that even shoulder checking wasn't 100% taking care of.

Overall, I'm very content with my choice and would recommend the s2k if you're on a budget, but if you have the cash, go for the Z. Still a great car and a lot more comfortable in the cockpit. I can barely move in my s2k!! ;) haha :rofl:

Final thing is the soft top, it's just another thing that wears down quicker and needs to be replaced.

[funkedelic2]

I have considered both cars myself and the only reason i would not buy an s2000 is because they are all convertibles, and i just can't stand that.

The 350z is a great looking car and i have driven a few and thought that they were not too bad at all, i think i would prefer the g35 over the 350z though.

I have yet to drive an s2k

[Dumbass17]

Originally posted by funkedelic2
I have considered both cars myself and the only reason i would not buy an s2000 is because they are all convertibles, and i just can't stand that.

The 350z is a great looking car and i have driven a few and thought that they were not too bad at all, i think i would prefer the g35 over the 350z though.

I have yet to drive an s2k

+1

[TurboD]

Originally posted by funkedelic2
I have considered both cars myself and the only reason i would not buy an s2000 is because they are all convertibles, and i just can't stand that.


several companies make hard top's for the s2k

http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p311/AnotherEJ/favs2k.jpg

[funkedelic2]

Originally posted by TurboD


several companies make hard top's for the s2k

http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p311/AnotherEJ/favs2k.jpg

that looks hot, but i'm saying is that if i were to buy that, the top would remain on like 96% of the time just because i don't care for convertibles so it would be a waste for me to buy it even if there was a hardtop for it, its like buying a truck and never using it to haul anything, ever.

I just wish they would have made these in a coupe as well.

[dimi]

I can provide some of my knowledge on S2000s, the 350Z I have only ridden in. If you do decide on an S2K, get an AP2(04+). Here are some of the advantages (I own an 01):

-First off an 00-01 is just so damn slow in the lower range. The early ECU 00-01, is pig rich everywhere and timing is very conservative too. Essentially you have no power until 6000. An 02-03 ECU is better in this respect.

-00-mid02 have the same oil bolts as a GSR (need source, not sure). Therefore running the car at 8000-9000 for extended periods of time (top speed runs) will score your bore = new block. This is still a hypothesis but most of the scored cylinder 4 failures are on 00-01s. I changed these and they are a pain.

-Most AP1s have clutch buzz. I have learned to live with it but some can't stand it.

-Most AP1s eat a lot of oil. Some people don't check their oil twice a week. Low Oil + 9000rpm = GG. My consumption has lowered since switching to Amsoil 10W-30, but you still have to check it minimum every gas tank.

-AP2 tranny > AP1 tranny. Carbon synchros and lower gearing 1-4th (faster).

-More HP and more potential down the road. F22C dyno ~ 10whp more than F20C despite being rated the same. If you go turbo/supercharger down the road the differences in torque will be very noticeable.

In closing if you really want 9000 revs go for a 2003. If you have money to spare AP2 all the way. Overall they are all wicked cars though, and I would never think of selling mine. My S2000 is my main source of stress relief.

[Lex350]

test drive the two cars back to back and it will be obvious. The Z feels like it weighs 5000lbs.

I guess it depends on your driving style. If you are a cruiser get the Z. if you like a car you can throw into turns as fast as you care, then get the S2000

[pinoyhero]

Yeah its been said but if you can go for the AP2, its a must. The AP1s are great but the upgrade is well worth it IMO.

[ShermanEF9]

S2K...

You'd be buying the perfect honda.
How can you pass up honda reliability, rear wheel drive and overall fun!

[InLoveWitRSX]

I have driven both and the 350z was way more boring then when driving the s2k. Unless your not looking for raw performance and FUN, go for the 350z, otherwise definately test drive a s2000 and you will see what I mean.

[Casa]

its about practicality vs. handling

[LongCity]

Originally posted by Casa
its about practicality vs. handling

Huh? No it's not.

[badatusrnames]

All the Honda fanboys are really coming out for this thread...

To the OP, I guess you'll have to try to get in a test drive of both and make your decision.

I would obviously have to agree with the assessment that the Z won't handle like a go cart as the S2000 would. Although, I know a guy with a Z that upgraded his suspension, which has made a world of difference, especially coupled with the already decent TQ and power.

[BigShow]

Absolutely love my ap2, its ok in the city but the real fun is on the highways!! Glad I chose the s2k over 350z.

[whiskas]

When you test the S2000 try not to be in the middle of a corner when you hit VTEC in 1st gear. Oh boy that was a mess :facepalm:

[Jlude]

Originally posted by funkedelic2


that looks hot, but i'm saying is that if i were to buy that, the top would remain on like 96% of the time just because i don't care for convertibles so it would be a waste for me to buy it even if there was a hardtop for it, its like buying a truck and never using it to haul anything, ever.

I just wish they would have made these in a coupe as well.


That's why I bought my CR, I never liked convertibles. Hate the soft top look.

I love having the hardtop.

[Dumbass17]

i'm gonna get in shit for this lol


but i can't stop thinking MIATA everytime i see a s2000.:drama:

[Impreza]

If you get an AP1 00-01, get a VAFC and get a tune!

[schocker]

Originally posted by Dumbass17
i'm gonna get in shit for this lol


but i can't stop thinking MIATA everytime i see a s2000.:drama:
dumbass....;)

Between the two, I would go for an S2000, both of the vehicles have about the same practicality, if you want practicality you would have to opt for a G35C not a 350Z. The S2000 handles great and has a very good engine, and is a blast to drive, and the convertible makes it even more fun, and if you want the hard top, plenty of options are available.

[Skyline_Addict]

welcome do behonda.ca

[Carlton]

I have a Z, it feels heavy and that is my only complaint. You can feel it in the steering. But then again the new GT-R is a pig too...

[Dumbass17]

Originally posted by Skyline_Addict
welcome do behonda.ca
uh, what?


wanna switch usernames? :P

where's the link to these cheap us cars?!

[Weapon_R]

I'd take the 350z. Theres no trunk room in the S2000, the car is pretty highstrung (AP1), and it's not terribly quick. Handles perfect though.

The 350z has more power, handles great, and theres more interior space. You also get a v6 engine that doesn't need to be kept at 6000rpm to stay happy.

[Tram Common]

S2K's are gorgeous, they are slightly more "petite" looking in there styling that's for sure... but they just make the cut on NOT being a girly car IMO.

I think it's a decision of whether you want a light versatile S2K or a heavy more powerful 350Z.

...that's from a stock point of view as well...if you're going to tune it and go aftermarket...then it really doesn't matter becuz both are heavy hitters for everything in the tuning world.

[analbumcover]

you'll have to try the S2K before you buy. Not to see if you like how it handles/performs, but to see how easily you fit.

These things are tiny!...

The 350z on the other hand has a couple more inches of shoulder room, leg room etc.

Sure its heavy but to me that makes me feel like i am in more control.

[arian_ma]

Originally posted by Dumbass17

uh, what?


wanna switch usernames? :P

where's the link to these cheap us cars?!
Can you stop posting? Like...forever?

[HiSpec]

hmm since you are purchasing from the states, have you looked at if you can get those "special editions" of 350Z?
Nismo 350Z for example?

But you might want to check if any of those are available in NA market.

[crach]

I have an 07 z and love it its got lots of power and more roomy for me, its got alot more torque then the s2000 but doesnt handle wuite the same ... ove the looks of both of them ...it coem sdown to personal prefrence really

[jbabante]

how can u say "no" to this ass?

http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/ee296/jeffrix14/ass.jpg

i couldn't.

[analbumcover]

Originally posted by crach
I have an 07 z and love it its got lots of power and more roomy for me, its got alot more torque then the s2000 but doesnt handle wuite the same ... ove the looks of both of them ...it coem sdown to personal prefrence really

This guy knows what he is talking about!

[redblack]

the only thing i dont like about my ap1 is that i have no room for storage! other than that, its a fun little car, much better than my s14

[adam c]

Originally posted by jbabante
how can u say "no" to this ass?
i couldn't.

jeff?

[Team_Mclaren]

Originally posted by jbabante
how can u say "no" to this ass?


i couldn't.

sure if you like a fatass, fat people needs loving too

[jbabante]

Originally posted by adam c


jeff?

yep... hey adam didn't know ur in a PHEDO bear club... we should've gone to Chucky Cheese instead on friday night.:D

[Skyline_Addict]

Originally posted by Dumbass17

uh, what?


wanna switch usernames? :P

where's the link to these cheap us cars?!


i guess your level of intelligence cannot grasp the satirical nature of my post? :dunno:

[Casa]

350Z is way more practical. storage room, power, V6, etc.

[hadookin]

I loved my S2000 this summer, I don't think anything was better than that car on a warm evening! plus, clubs fit in the trunk easily!

I wouldn't mind a 350 though, and will probably pick up one of those before I bought another S, just for the extra power and room. I didn't think the Honda was a very good highway car and road trips were outta the question for me, it was a tight fucking fit in there.

However, I think interior/cockpit, quality-wise, the Honda has it over the 350.

[colinxx235]

mmmm 350z ftw =)

[Dumbass17]

Originally posted by arian_ma

Can you stop posting? Like...forever?
..but then who else is gonna quote me and hate on me?

[4doorj]

I know my opinion wont count because i've owned three s2000's
but i love the s2k! my favorite car in its price range!
soooooooo much fun. People that are saying that there isn't much trunk space in the s2000 is correct, but I don't even think the 350z has much more trunk space. They both suck for practicality in my opinion. And yes I agree ap2 is much better. 00-01 sucks because of plastic window, carpet center console. 02-03 upgrades are totally worth the extra money over a 00-01. 04+ all around is just superior, but I do miss the 9k rev. These are the reason's why I kept upgrading 00 to 02 to 04.

I've driven the G35, very nice car. Torque feels good, exhaust tone is just :drool: .

Overal both are sweet cars! Buy both:angel:

[arian_ma]

Originally posted by Dumbass17

..but then who else is gonna quote me and hate on me?
No one else will need to if you just go ahead and quit!

[Skyline_Addict]

Originally posted by Weapon_R
I'd take the 350z. Theres no trunk room in the S2000...


I remember there was a review done by a british car enthusiasts' show, comparing the s2000 to the 350z. I do remember them mentioning that the s2000 actually had a roomier trunk than the 350z.

albeit, the cargo space sucks for both cars, but I don't think that anyone who is interested in either car would care about this. :dunno:

[95EagleAWD]

Storage space in the S2K?

I don't know what you guys think you need to haul in your car, but the compartment between the seats holds a bunch of CDs, the secret compartment is rather large and the trunk fits my hockey bag.

What are you guys trying to fit in a 2-seat roadster? A BBQ?

As for the S2K vs. Z argument, I was going to stay out, since I own an S2000 and I'm obviously biased.

I've driven Zs, both stock and modified and they just don't feel like a "sports car" to me. It's heavy, feels cheap inside, and just looks pretty chunky. It feels like a GT car and I'm sure it would be great going to Vancouver or Winnipeg or something. You can't fit shit in the trunk because of the rear strut bar.

The S2000 is a toy compared to anything I've ever driven. It's more fun than a Miata (which you'll only make fun of if you've never driven one) and it feels light and tossable. The back end is easy to slide and catch. The engine is a screamer and yes, you need to rev it to go anywhere in a hurry. But it's fine around town. It makes more torque than Civic's do, so it's not hard to drive in stop and go like people said it is.

[iceburns288]

Zs can actually vary on weight depending on year and trim. The 07/08 GT Roadsters (top of the line + convertible) can weigh like almost 3600 (I think) wheras my 05 base model weighs just about 3100-3150. Heavier than an S2k by quite a margin, but not heavy by more modern standards... how much does the GT-R weigh again? :p

The Z has a fantastic amount of torque that I took for granted for a while. It really helps sometimes when I'm just cruising but I really want to make a yellow light or pass someone. It pulls really strong from like 2k and then falls off slightly around 6200.

The S2000 is an equally nice car, but for different tastes. Obviously lighter and sprightlier but nowhere near as much spontaneous get-up-and-go around town.

Oh, and PS, I am selling my Z if you want an 05 base with 19s and a body color-matched center console...

[adam c]

Originally posted by jbabante


yep... hey adam didn't know ur in a PHEDO bear club... we should've gone to Chucky Cheese instead on friday night.:D

ha of course man ;)

[Sorath]

s2000 = more fun

350z = more practical

both great cars

[Xtrema]

Originally posted by Skyline_Addict


I remember there was a review done by a british car enthusiasts' show, comparing the s2000 to the 350z. I do remember them mentioning that the s2000 actually had a roomier trunk than the 350z.

albeit, the cargo space sucks for both cars, but I don't think that anyone who is interested in either car would care about this. :dunno:

They probably comparing 350Z roadster VS S2000.

There is no way S2000 would have more room than a 350Z coupe.

Tested an 06 350Z and the steering feel is numb is the best way to describe it. But the engine and exhaust note is to die for. I think 07+ would be even better with a more powerful VQ and wider torque band.

[BigShow]

Who buys a roadster for trunk space anyways :dunno:

[jwslam]

Originally posted by Sorath
s2000 = more fun

350z = more practical

both great cars

+1

[Eleanor]

Originally posted by BigShow
Who buys a roadster for trunk space anyways :dunno:
Bingo, if you're that concerned about trunk space, don't get either. That being said, I've also heard rumours that the s2k does have more space because of some component sitting right in the back of the 350's trunk, getting in the way of everything.

[rc2002]

I've owned both, and it's a close call. If I lived in LA I would take the S2000.

The 350Z while it does not feel as nimble will still hold it's own in the corners albeit with a bit more body roll. It feels sloppier but in the city it's not all that noticeable.

Styling-wise the 350Z wins hands down - it's timeless styling just like the 300ZX. You get way more looks in that car. The S2000 doesn't look much different than a Miata to the average person.

Lighting is a big thing for me and the projectors on the S2000 provide a far superior beam pattern than the 350Z. At least for the earlier models. I think the Z has revised housings in the later years.

Power delivery is way better in the Z. You step on the gas pedal in any gear and you go. For the S2 you really have to wind it up to move, and revving it up like all the time isn't the way I normally drive.

The visibility is poor in both cars but is way better in the S2. Rear visibility is non-existent in the Z. Backing up pretty much done blind. Seating position is also better in the S2 - the front visibility makes it very easy to navigate, even when parking.

As for the interior, the Z is more plush and luxurious and spacious. I would take it any day.

[shin0bi]

I'd go for the Z hands down. Can't argue with the power, or performance prowess.

The S2K will probably go farther without needing maintenance, but that's sort of a given since its a honda...

I think for Stop and Go traffic conditions, the S2000 is a royal pain in the ass too... this is just what I've heard though. Also to extract any decent power, you've really got to rev on it...

So for me, it'd be a 350z (hard top)

[95EagleAWD]

Originally posted by shin0bi

I think for Stop and Go traffic conditions, the S2000 is a royal pain in the ass too... this is just what I've heard though.



That seems to be a pretty big myth that surrounds the S2K.

I have NO PROBLEMS driving it in Stop and Go. It's just like any other car out there with a 6-speed.

If you can't drive a stick in traffic, it's not the car's fault.

[4doorj]

Originally posted by 95EagleAWD


That seems to be a pretty big myth that surrounds the S2K.

I have NO PROBLEMS driving it in Stop and Go. It's just like any other car out there with a 6-speed.

If you can't drive a stick in traffic, it's not the car's fault.
:werd:

[Jlude]

Originally posted by 95EagleAWD


That seems to be a pretty big myth that surrounds the S2K.

I have NO PROBLEMS driving it in Stop and Go. It's just like any other car out there with a 6-speed.

If you can't drive a stick in traffic, it's not the car's fault.


+1

[g-m]

Originally posted by richardchan2002
I've owned both, and it's a close call. If I lived in LA I would take the S2000.

The 350Z while it does not feel as nimble will still hold it's own in the corners albeit with a bit more body roll. It feels sloppier but in the city it's not all that noticeable.

Styling-wise the 350Z wins hands down - it's timeless styling just like the 300ZX. You get way more looks in that car. The S2000 doesn't look much different than a Miata to the average person.

Lighting is a big thing for me and the projectors on the S2000 provide a far superior beam pattern than the 350Z. At least for the earlier models. I think the Z has revised housings in the later years.

Power delivery is way better in the Z. You step on the gas pedal in any gear and you go. For the S2 you really have to wind it up to move, and revving it up like all the time isn't the way I normally drive.

The visibility is poor in both cars but is way better in the S2. Rear visibility is non-existent in the Z. Backing up pretty much done blind. Seating position is also better in the S2 - the front visibility makes it very easy to navigate, even when parking.

As for the interior, the Z is more plush and luxurious and spacious. I would take it any day.

what are you kidding??
I was reading through the thread and I was going to say get the S2000 because it doesn't look like total shit... The Z is a fatass with a cheap interior. I don't know how you could say that the Z33 looks anything near the level of the S2k, one of the most beautiful recent affordable cars imo. And I DRIVE a Z32! (Which DO have timeless styling unlike the Z33)

[carguy]

I have driven both on many occasions and I have to say for everyday daily driver it would be a 350Z for me. Sure the S2k is a lot of fun and has handling to instil confidence in even the newest of noobs to drive like a track star. But everyday drivability. I'm not the type that wants to rev past 4k for every shift up a gear. With the Z you just go easy and it'll get you moving along.

A car you can live with daily------> Z

A great/fun highly strung weekend car for the road----> S2k

I'm not putting down the S2k @ all I love em, but based on daily drivability that would be my pick

:thumbsup:

[rc2002]

Originally posted by g-m


what are you kidding??
I was reading through the thread and I was going to say get the S2000 because it doesn't look like total shit... The Z is a fatass with a cheap interior. I don't know how you could say that the Z33 looks anything near the level of the S2k, one of the most beautiful recent affordable cars imo. And I DRIVE a Z32! (Which DO have timeless styling unlike the Z33)

Styling is subjective. But even so, if you did a poll, the majority of people would see the 350Z as more exotic than the S2000. I had way more heads turn when I was driving the 350Z than with the S2000.

As far as cheap interiors go, have you ever sat in an S2000? The simplicity is nice, but the lack of tilt steering, power seats, heated seats, garage opener, trip computer, etc. hardly makes for a good interior.

[95EagleAWD]

Originally posted by richardchan2002

As far as cheap interiors go, have you ever sat in an S2000? The simplicity is nice, but the lack of tilt steering, power seats, heated seats, garage opener, trip computer, etc. hardly makes for a good interior.

Sure it does.

It's a SPORTS CAR!

I fucking hate crap like that that clutters and weighs down a car. It's a 2-seat roadster. The steering wheel is in a great spot. Heated seats? In a car that 99% of the people don't drive in the winter? Power seats? Why? Pull the handle, boom, you're set.

Maybe I'm a little too into the simple philosophy, but man, who needs all that extra junk in a sports car?

And I drive my S2K daily, and it's not hard to live with. It's warm with the top up and pretty quiet too.

[Skyline_Addict]

Originally posted by 95EagleAWD



Maybe I'm a little too into the simple philosophy, but man, who needs all that extra junk in a sports car?


:werd: I don't see why so many people on this thread are going on and on about cargo space/interior luxury on ANY of these cars. nobody buys either car (I would hope not) for those reasons, so any arguments or comparisons on those things are absolutely moot.

sure we can compare stuff like cockpit room (driver comfort) and even go as far as noise reduction. but heated seats? in an s2000?

let's face it. the interior on either car isn't the best for what you are paying for. one is a 2 door roadster, one is a two door coupe. just buy a lexus if you really care about heated seats or ride quality.

[rc2002]

Heated seats in a roadster should be standard fare. In the cool evenings with the top down heated seats are indispensable especially here in Calgary. I've found many occassions when I wish I had heated seats. And it was the deciding factor for more than one of my friends who own roadsters.

And yes it's already pretty obvious that you don't buy either car for interior or comfort. But if it comes down to it, it could be the swaying argument in making the decision to go with one car or the other.

Let's not forget that the intent of this thread was to provide arguments for or against each car to help the OP make his decision. Objective comparisons will help more than philisophical talk about why people buy sports cars.

[Skyline_Addict]

^^ i do understand your POV, although I wouldn't have thought that people normally would have considered it (this big of) a factor. but when it's cold/chilly/windy out, wouldn't you just put the top back up? even with an ass warmer, if the top's down and it's cold out, you're still going to be cold. i know that i'd just put the top up under those circumstances...heck, I don't even like the top down much, to be honest. but that's just my preference, and that's what it really comes down to - one's personal preference.

and you're simply just stating yours too, so I apologize for getting away from the intent of the thread. but i sure as hell wouldn't expect or want to pay extra for heated seats in a roadster. ;)

[imjimmylin]

I was in the same situation a while ago, I was in between the 350Z and the S2000.

After test driving both cars I decided to go for the S2000, reason being is because I wanted something that put a smile on my face everytime I got into it. The 350Z is a great car don't get me wrong but it isn't nearly as fun as the S2000.

+ you can't go wrong with a bulletproof honda engine :)

[403Gemini]

Originally posted by 95EagleAWD


Sure it does.

It's a SPORTS CAR!

I fucking hate crap like that that clutters and weighs down a car. It's a 2-seat roadster. The steering wheel is in a great spot. Heated seats? In a car that 99% of the people don't drive in the winter? Power seats? Why? Pull the handle, boom, you're set.

Maybe I'm a little too into the simple philosophy, but man, who needs all that extra junk in a sports car?

And I drive my S2K daily, and it's not hard to live with. It's warm with the top up and pretty quiet too.

Same argument could be made about the Dodge Viper but nobody buys it ;) (I do though)

Edit: "buys it" as in buys the argument, not the car itself. Had to clear that up for the ESL's on this board :D

[BigShow]

Originally posted by imjimmylin
I was in the same situation a while ago, I was in between the 350Z and the S2000.

After test driving both cars I decided to go for the S2000, reason being is because I wanted something that put a smile on my face everytime I got into it. The 350Z is a great car don't get me wrong but it isn't nearly as fun as the S2000.

+ you can't go wrong with a bulletproof honda engine :)

Same for me.

As to above, I've never once wished I had a bigger trunk, heated seats, tilt steering...the car is simply a blast to drive which for me outweighs everything else. OP should decide after driving both cars.

[Goker]

I hate honda's lol but for sure S2K man...

[beyond101]

i HATE nissan(s) lol but for sure 350z man. and yes i drive a civic

[schocker]

Originally posted by Goker
I hate honda's lol but for sure S2K man...



Originally posted by beyond101
i HATE nissan(s) lol but for sure 350z man. and yes i drive a civic

omg, you two are opposite twins
:facepalm:

[treg50]

Like Arnold Schwarzenegger and Danny DeVito.

[bobby_lu]

Bizzarro S2K

[beyond101]

nevermind :facepalm:

[dimi]

Get a 350Z, too many s2000s around.

[Skyline_Addict]

Originally posted by dimi
Get a 350Z, too many s2000s around.

I see way more Zs and s2ks?

[crazedmodder]

S2ks have the best low-beam HID projectors besides the LS430 :)

I've never driven either but the S2000 looks a ton better than the 350Z convertible. Just go to local dealers and check out both, make sure they have enough room and are comfortable for you. It's not worth droping money and waste time importing if you won't love the car.

[tawheed]

350z = heavy and tank like yet smooth (GT Car)

S2000 = more flickable and revvy (Sports car)

[beung]

Ok I am in the same situation, here's my situation in chronological order.

05 G35x, probably the best all around best bang for the buck. It is exactly what you think it is, a sports luxury sedan....it doesn't pretend to be anything else.

03.5 M3, great car, just wasn't as sporty as was hoping. Best looking car I have ever owned hands down. But it lacked the harshness of owning a "pure" sports I was looking for.

06 S4, V8 baby, the more I drive it the more fun it is becoming. Great lowend power and man it sounds good.

I also own an 03 CBR 600rr so I don't mind having to "work" to stay in the power band but it's nice being able to be lazy like in the S4.

My original plan was to keep the S4 (I may replace that with an RDX or something), keep the 600rr and pickup an S2000 in the summer.

The S2000 will be my summer DD not a week ender so that is why I was considering a 350z roadster because of the V6 but again if I wanted to be lazy I can drive the S4. I like the sinlge purposeness of the S2000 which is one of the main reasons I got rid of the M3 - too much lux and not enough sport IMO.

I even went and looked at the supercharged S2000 that is for sale but the supercharger doesn't really make any extra power until like 6k so really not worth it to me.

The only problem is finding the color and year I want :P

[95EagleAWD]

Originally posted by beung

I even went and looked at the supercharged S2000 that is for sale but the supercharger doesn't really make any extra power until like 6k so really not worth it to me.


Ummm... the S2000 doesn't make power stock until 6000 rpm either.

The Supercharger is over 100 whp more powerful than stock.

If you don't rev the SHIT out of your S2000, you're going to be VERY disappointed. They need to rev like hell, or they don't go very quick.

[beung]

Originally posted by 95EagleAWD


Ummm... the S2000 doesn't make power stock until 6000 rpm either.

The Supercharger is over 100 whp more powerful than stock.

If you don't rev the SHIT out of your S2000, you're going to be VERY disappointed. They need to rev like hell, or they don't go very quick.

I know, if the supercharger made more power down low I would be all over it but it's a hard sell for me because it make very little extra power below 5k.

[792171004]

350Z all the way, the car is soo fun to drive and so much power, haven't driven s2k but it should be fun 350z looks better:bigpimp:

[Cody D]

Originally posted by 95EagleAWD
They need to rev like hell, or they don't go very quick.

The one I test drove wasn't fast even when I did rev it, haha. :thumbsup:

[dino_martini]

350z

Even though I hate the exterior, interior, and its a Nissan.

[beung]

I'll tell you what, there are a crap load of 350z roadsters around. They vary in price so much it's just stupid.

Now, are the Brembos worth the trouble of acually finding a Raodster GT in a color I want that isn't and auto...what the heck it that all about?

[JEFFRIX]

the roadster only looks good when the top is down... the coupe on the other hand is just lovely... i owned both cars... 350z by a mile.