PDA

View Full Version : anyone with a 90ish mustang?



Dumbass17
11-08-2008, 02:55 AM
i'm thinking i should maybe pick up a 90ish mustang 5.0L for some summer fun

any thoughts? :dunno:

Supa Dexta
11-08-2008, 03:06 AM
This guy does..

http://www.goodlookin.tv/news/zubaz_ful.jpg

Dumbass17
11-08-2008, 03:19 AM
I KNOW RIGHT!

it'd be so fun :poosie:

Moe Man
11-08-2008, 10:12 AM
want mine?

DomesticBoy
11-08-2008, 10:49 AM
had 2 5.0's
super fun cars id go for it again definetly
OR
goe for moe man's, his is ridiculously :bigpimp:

sillysod
11-08-2008, 12:24 PM
5.0L is probably the best bang for your buck sports car you can get.

BMW = Douchebag Stereotype
Mustang = Wolf T-Shirt Stereotype

But atleast with a mildly modded 5.0 you can kick 95% of the cars on the road's asses. There is nothing as fun as a rwd car with 300+ or so HP that is cheap enough to bag the shit out of without worrying..

DomesticBoy
11-08-2008, 11:32 PM
yep and parts are so common to find for these cars

Hamann
11-10-2008, 01:05 PM
Have one and Love it, fun to drive stock and it only gets better when you start tinkering.
Plus no matter what anyone says nothing beats the rumble of a big V8 :poosie:
You will have to put up with all the little high school kids wanting to race you at every street light :banghead: but thats getting to the point where it really doesnt matter what you pull up in they want to race.

If your just looking for a fun car by all means get one, there cheap as hell, and like Sillysod said amazing bang for the buck.

Finding one without rust will cost you quite a bit more though.

:devil:

Dumbass17
11-10-2008, 01:07 PM
Originally posted by sillysod
BMW = Douchebag Stereotype
Mustang = Wolf T-Shirt Stereotype

haha PERFECT

i have a wolf shirt with the sleeves cut off in my summer trash clothes!!


now i really want one haha

5000Audi
11-10-2008, 01:09 PM
Originally posted by Hamann

Plus no matter what anyone says nothing beats the rumble of a big V8


Big??? 5.0 302 is a small V8 lol...

but the mustangs are sweet.. my first car was a 89 mustang with a inline 4... had mad fun in that unit in winter!!!

sillysod
11-10-2008, 04:26 PM
Originally posted by 5000Audi


Big??? 5.0 302 is a small V8 lol...

but the mustangs are sweet.. my first car was a 89 mustang with a inline 4... had mad fun in that unit in winter!!!


yeah i was thinking the same thing.


the turbo 2.3's 4 bangers are some of the fastest mustangs you can get.

gofastmerc
11-10-2008, 05:01 PM
I had a bunch. Get a stick, change the gears and have a blast driving it around.

:burnout:

403Gemini
11-10-2008, 05:51 PM
Originally posted by Hamann
Have one and Love it, fun to drive stock and it only gets better when you start tinkering.
Plus no matter what anyone says nothing beats the rumble of a big V8 :poosie:
You will have to put up with all the little high school kids wanting to race you at every street light :banghead: but thats getting to the point where it really doesnt matter what you pull up in they want to race.

If your just looking for a fun car by all means get one, there cheap as hell, and like Sillysod said amazing bang for the buck.

Finding one without rust will cost you quite a bit more though.

:devil:

Will it? Buy one from the States for cheap ;)

Darkane
11-10-2008, 06:45 PM
Not many cars with a simple gear change and slicks get into the 13's :)

My vote is a '93 LX coupe if you can find one. Get the Dark green and find a set of chrome pony rims. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

I might do this in the near future just for the hell of it.

Dumbass17
11-10-2008, 09:14 PM
hmmmm

i wonder how much a decent one would run me $....i'm just worried about inspections :P

mark4091
11-10-2008, 09:33 PM
http://calgary.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehicles-cars-Ford-FS-1989-mustang-lx-5-0-W0QQAdIdZ85506216


You probably want to look for something like that.

inline6turbo
11-10-2008, 10:22 PM
Originally posted by mark4091
http://calgary.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehicles-cars-Ford-FS-1989-mustang-lx-5-0-W0QQAdIdZ85506216


You probably want to look for something like that.

That was my baby :(

Kloubek
11-10-2008, 10:32 PM
I know it was not as popular with the younger crowd, but I always liked the ground effects package of the GT. I had an 88 Cobra and it was actually a fair amount of fun. Handled poorly though (for my standards anyway), and winter driving was impossible.

Still, I think the Ford V8 sounded the sweetest. Especially with the aftermarket exhaust I had on mine.

The better car though: My old 91 Z28. Better handling, better power, sleeker looks (imo). Problem is, they are not found as inexpensive as the 5.0's and the price difference doesn't justify the minor performance difference.

DomesticBoy
11-10-2008, 10:59 PM
Originally posted by mark4091
http://calgary.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehicles-cars-Ford-FS-1989-mustang-lx-5-0-W0QQAdIdZ85506216


You probably want to look for something like that.




:werd:
if i had an extra 1900 layin around id get it in a heartbeat

sillysod
11-11-2008, 01:24 PM
Originally posted by Kloubek
The better car though: My old 91 Z28. Better handling, better power, sleeker looks (imo).

are you kidding? they were way heavier and much slower than a 5.0

with a $600 nitrous kit and decent tires you can get a 5.0 5spd into the 12's.

you'd be lucky to break 13 with the camaro.

Hamann
11-11-2008, 01:56 PM
It really comes down to personal Preference between the Mustang and Camaro, i lookied at a couple camaro's before buying my mustang 2 years ago but i was just not a fan of the interior at all.

I personally love the look of the GT's with the ground effects package, and i like the look of the hatchback alot better than the notch. But again that comes to Personal choice.

You can easily find one in pretty good condition for under 5g, and if you spend some time looking you will even be able to find one with most of the bolt ons already done.

R!zz0
11-11-2008, 08:24 PM
Originally posted by sillysod
you'd be lucky to break 13 with the camaro.

Yeah with the L98.

You can break into 12's with LT1 and LS1 camaro's with few mods.
My Z28 has headers, exhaust, mild cam and i did 12.8 without a tune and with my C6 chrome wheels 18/19's that are very heavy.

This guy i know has a 1988 GT with headers, cam, gears and other goodies and i have no problem beating him. He's a good driver too :dunno:



But if it's a camaro SS like the pic below, then you're looking for trouble.






http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2012/ls1catfish0ji.jpg

Moe Man
11-12-2008, 12:27 AM
Originally posted by R!zz0


Yeah with the L98.

You can break into 12's with LT1 and LS1 camaro's with few mods.
My Z28 has headers, exhaust, mild cam and i did 12.8 without a tune and with my C6 chrome wheels 18/19's that are very heavy.

This guy i know has a 1988 GT with headers, cam, gears and other goodies and i have no problem beating him. He's a good driver too :dunno:



But if it's a camaro SS like the pic below, then you're looking for trouble


http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2012/ls1catfish0ji.jpg


yes but the LT1 is the new camaros and you cant find those cheap. the old ones (90ish) are not fast at all and the 5.7 only comes in auto ( unless you fine the super rare ones which will cost a arm and a leg). i want to sell my mustang and get a WS6 TA but not easy finding them for a good price.

TurboZombie
11-12-2008, 09:01 AM
Originally posted by Moe Man



yes but the LT1 is the new camaros and you cant find those cheap. the old ones (90ish) are not fast at all and the 5.7 only comes in auto ( unless you fine the super rare ones which will cost a arm and a leg). i want to sell my mustang and get a WS6 TA but not easy finding them for a good price.

All 3rd Gen F-Bodys have auto trannys with the 5.7, except for the Firehawk by SLP.

sillysod
11-12-2008, 09:44 AM
The LT1 Camaro's are really nice, but again you are talking about a lot more $$$.

The 3rd Gen F-Bodys can't touch a 5 spd 5.0L LX or SVO 2.3T..

Kloubek
11-12-2008, 10:04 AM
Originally posted by sillysod


are you kidding? they were way heavier and much slower than a 5.0

with a $600 nitrous kit and decent tires you can get a 5.0 5spd into the 12's.

you'd be lucky to break 13 with the camaro.

Not too sure where you're getting your facts from man.

91 Z28: Weight: 3381

Power: 230hp/300 tq. OR from the L98 5.7L: 245/345. To be fair, my model had the lesser engine.

91 Mustang LX 5.0: Weight:3166.

Power: 225hp/300tq.

It should be noted that in 1993, Ford reduced the claimed ratings of horsepower for their engines to 205hp/275tq. It's not that the engine itself became less powerful, but Ford decided the new numbers were more accurate in real life.

You could add at least 100 pounds for the Mustang GT over the LX - making the Mustang and Camaro very close in weight. Nor are we comparing cars on nitrous.... we're talking about stock cars here. I'm guessing putting nitrous on a Z28 would add a lot of power too.

I am attaching a chart for your reading pleasure supplied by Road and Track comparing 88 models. Granted, there were likely minor tweaks between 88 and 91, but it gives you a pretty good idea that the straight-line performance was very similar between the two - though the Camaro edged the mustang on all-out top-end.

But the most important discrepancy in the chart: The braking and handling were not even in the same ballpark between the two cars.

So - let's recap:
Speed: Close, but edge to the Camaro in the end.
Handling: Camaro, hands down.
Braking: Camaro, hands down.

But yet, somehow, you believe the Mustang was the better car? I know the Mustang has much more of a "cult" following, but it was NOT the better car. It is also easier to find aftermarket modding parts, no doubt -which fairly easily make it faster than the Camaro. Still, it takes a lot of modding to make it out-handle the Camaro. And the Pinto-sourced rear brakes on the Mustang would have to be swapped out completely for it to compete in the braking department.

Dave P
11-12-2008, 10:25 AM
girls on stand by, waiting just to say high, did i stop? no i just drove by........

Moe Man
11-12-2008, 11:16 AM
Originally posted by TurboZombie


All 3rd Gen F-Bodys have auto trannys with the 5.7, except for the Firehawk by SLP.

your wrong there was a very rare model that came with a 5 speed and had the 5.7L.

i saw one go in a auction, it was a 92 vert with the 5.7 5 spd.
$22500 :nut:

R!zz0
11-12-2008, 04:41 PM
Originally posted by Moe Man


your wrong there was a very rare model that came with a 5 speed and had the 5.7L.

i saw one go in a auction, it was a 92 vert with the 5.7 5 spd.
$22500 :nut:

92 verts are very rare cars. They are 25th anniversary cars and they only made 1,254 convertibles.

I definitely would not pay $22,500 for one but, a true collector would.

R!zz0
11-12-2008, 05:08 PM
Originally posted by Moe Man

i want to sell my mustang and get a WS6 TA but not easy finding them for a good price.


Something like this? Go to the States and pick one up for cheap...Really cheap.




http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y46/Ghand/redigert.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y46/Ghand/100_090020small.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y46/Ghand/100_089920small.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y46/Ghand/000_0139.jpg

sillysod
11-12-2008, 05:20 PM
1991 Camaro 3103lbs 5spd

305v8 W/O TPI = 170hp/225ft-lb
305v8 W/ TPI = 220-230 hp/ 290-300ft-lb



1991 Mustang 2775lbs 5spd

302v8 LX = 205-225hp/275-300ft-lb
302v8 Cobra = 245hp/320ft-lb



I personally don't think either car is particularly good. I did have a 2003 Mustang GT with mods as well as a 1999 Camaro LT1. Both were fun cars, both were built cheap and neither could brake or corner at speed as well as my Audi can. Saying that one is better than the other is pointless as both will get schooled by even a 1/2 decent sport sedan. Although the Camaro is better at it, neither car was designed for corners.

If you are looking for a CHEAP best bang for your buck car the mustang is the only option. A decent Camaro is going to cost you double and you will spend more on mods as well.

Moe Man
11-12-2008, 05:52 PM
trying to get a 01 WS6 black on black 6 speed, right now.

he is asking 19500 but i think i can get it for 16000.

R!zz0
11-12-2008, 05:59 PM
^^ Calgary or the States?

If you get the time, checkout www.LS1tech.com and scroll through the for sale section.

GQBalla
11-12-2008, 06:38 PM
Originally posted by inline6turbo


That was my baby :(

oh no..
was that your old skyline in the garage??

Moe Man
11-13-2008, 11:51 AM
Originally posted by R!zz0
^^ Calgary or the States?

If you get the time, checkout www.LS1tech.com and scroll through the for sale section.

calgary

Toms-SC
11-13-2008, 12:36 PM
Currently kicking tires and looking for a Bullitt if anybody sees an interesting one.

DomesticBoy
11-13-2008, 04:42 PM
your looking into getting a bullitt?

http://calgary.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehicles-cars-Ford-2001-Mustang-Bullitt-W0QQAdIdZ86895041


if i completly misunderstood my bad haha:dunno:

Kloubek
11-13-2008, 04:56 PM
sillysod: Not sure where your source if info is on the weight, but I'm not going to claim it is any more or less valid than my own sources. Let's just say it appears there is some discrepancy as to the weight of these cars! (Are you sure you don't have the stat for the 4 cyl mustang?) lol

I will agree with you though that these cars cannot measure up to today's sport sedans. But then, the original intent of the OP was to get an OLD 5.0. Back in the day, these cars weren't that bad, and I doubt he could do much better with the funds available.

Regarding that cherry Trans Am above: That's a beautiful car! I always liked the 98+ design, and they were wicked fast.

I'm trying to get my hands on a 2000 supercharged WS6. Being dicked around a little bit on it tho, so never know if it will happen or not. *fingers crossed*

TurboZombie
11-13-2008, 06:02 PM
Originally posted by Moe Man


your wrong there was a very rare model that came with a 5 speed and had the 5.7L.

i saw one go in a auction, it was a 92 vert with the 5.7 5 spd.
$22500 :nut:

That would be a custom install and not from the factory. I've checked two references and none show any factory 5sp with the 5.7.

Moe Man
11-24-2008, 02:42 PM
your wrong 100% ^

zipdoa
11-24-2008, 04:35 PM
Has anyone seen the Departed? What color combo is that mustang that he drives? it's blue and grey if I remember correctly. I'd love to find one like that, I think it looks great!

Moe Man
11-24-2008, 06:31 PM
Originally posted by zipdoa
Has anyone seen the Departed? What color combo is that mustang that he drives? it's blue and grey if I remember correctly. I'd love to find one like that, I think it looks great!

GT ya those are popular.

sillysod
11-24-2008, 07:33 PM
Originally posted by Kloubek
sillysod: Not sure where your source if info is on the weight, but I'm not going to claim it is any more or less valid than my own sources. Let's just say it appears there is some discrepancy as to the weight of these cars! (Are you sure you don't have the stat for the 4 cyl mustang?) lol

It was from car & Driver or something I can pull it up, but it did vary year to year.


Originally posted by Kloubek
I will agree with you though that these cars cannot measure up to today's sport sedans. But then, the original intent of the OP was to get an OLD 5.0. Back in the day, these cars weren't that bad, and I doubt he could do much better with the funds available.

100% Agree, I was saying that for the $$$ he couldn't find a better bang for your buck car than the 5.0L


Originally posted by Kloubek
Regarding that cherry Trans Am above: That's a beautiful car! I always liked the 98+ design, and they were wicked fast.

The WS6 is still a beautiful car, when I bought my '03 GT it was because I couldn't come up with the additional funds for the WS6. It was a little more $$$ but a lot more car. I sold my mustang a year later, but if I bought the Firebird I'm sure I would have kept it.

zipdoa
11-24-2008, 08:00 PM
hahaha speak of the devil... the Mustangs from the departed are for sale

http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=4116772

Kloubek
11-24-2008, 08:31 PM
Originally posted by sillysod


The WS6 is still a beautiful car, when I bought my '03 GT it was because I couldn't come up with the additional funds for the WS6. It was a little more $$$ but a lot more car. I sold my mustang a year later, but if I bought the Firebird I'm sure I would have kept it.

I bet. When I see the 98+'s on the street, I'm always eyeing them. I have a feeling that if I do get my hands on this one I'm dealing for that I'll be keeping it as my summer ride, then get a TJ or something for the winter. 0-60 in 5.2 and 1/4 mile in 13.4 is pretty impressive stock - let alone with a Whipple supercharger... it will pretty much beat anything on the road... provided you can get the tires to stop spinning, and you're not driving with too many hard twists and turns. They handle well, but let's face it - not nearly as well as say, a Corvette or Porsche.

It is what it is. And I LIKE what it is. :)

TurboZombie
11-25-2008, 09:26 AM
Originally posted by Moe Man
your wrong 100% ^

What is your source for showing a factory 5.7L F-body with a 5 speed in 1992? I can't find any?!?!

Moe Man
11-25-2008, 03:29 PM
the source is my friend, he owned it for 2 years and it was stock. the only thing was the passenger door was painted. dont know if i can get records from Adesa auction or not about the car but i am 100% sure they made them. i even saw one for sale in calgary in the summer time, could have been the same car.

sorry man maybe the year was wrong try 91 90 89 :dunno:

but 5.7L for sure and vert

zipdoa
11-26-2008, 06:05 PM
Looking at a mustang on Kijiji

265 000KM... any common problems with mustangs and anything to look for with a 91 GT 5.0?

http://calgary.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehicles-cars-Ford-1991-FORD-MUSTANG-5-0-W0QQAdIdZ89773391

Elev8d_St8
11-26-2008, 08:40 PM
my 87 gt is for sale if your interested. 145 XXX kms, MAC offroad H-pipe, magnaflow catback with LX tips. LX tails ( still got the stock cheesegrater GT lights), MAC cold air, FRPP lowering springs, Tokico shocks and struts, MM subframe connectors, and various other minor suspension mods. PM if your interested

TurboZombie
11-27-2008, 08:28 AM
Originally posted by Moe Man
the source is my friend, he owned it for 2 years and it was stock. the only thing was the passenger door was painted. dont know if i can get records from Adesa auction or not about the car but i am 100% sure they made them. i even saw one for sale in calgary in the summer time, could have been the same car.

sorry man maybe the year was wrong try 91 90 89 :dunno:

but 5.7L for sure and vert

Have your friend or you input the RPO codes of the car at this Camaro site. It will list all the options the car came with from the factory.
http://www.camarosource.ca/php/camaro_info_db/index.php?act=decoding&year=1992

Moe Man
11-27-2008, 01:46 PM
the car is long gone. ^

fast95pony
11-27-2008, 03:59 PM
Mine is still for sale :



http://forums.beyond.ca/showthread.php?s=&postid=2702705#post2702705

403Gemini
11-27-2008, 04:15 PM
Originally posted by fast95pony
Mine is still for sale :



http://forums.beyond.ca/showthread.php?s=&postid=2702705#post2702705

Shameless plug? ;)

J/k looking at those pics, that is one fucking CLEAN mustang!

Toms-SC
11-27-2008, 04:40 PM
Originally posted by fast95pony
Mine is still for sale :



http://forums.beyond.ca/showthread.php?s=&postid=2702705#post2702705

200000 KM's for $9,800 when you can get a newer Mustang with less KM's for a couple more G's? Not so much a great deal.

zipdoa
11-27-2008, 04:44 PM
95's are ugly. fox body GT FTW

sputnik
11-27-2008, 04:54 PM
Originally posted by sillysod
Mustang = Wolf T-Shirt Stereotype


I think you mean "Punisher T-Shirt".

403Gemini
11-27-2008, 05:00 PM
Originally posted by sputnik


I think you mean "Punisher T-Shirt".

Hell yes son i have 3 of them, and im going out a mullet. Im so bad ass ;)

DomesticBoy
11-27-2008, 07:13 PM
Originally posted by zipdoa
Looking at a mustang on Kijiji

265 000KM... any common problems with mustangs and anything to look for with a 91 GT 5.0?

http://calgary.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehicles-cars-Ford-1991-FORD-MUSTANG-5-0-W0QQAdIdZ89773391


265k bagged on kilometers:D only common problem i could think of is gaskets. But thats way to much $$ for that many k

zipdoa
11-27-2008, 08:49 PM
Originally posted by DomesticBoy



265k bagged on kilometers:D only common problem i could think of is gaskets. But thats way to much $$ for that many k

Thats what I was thinking... maybe I could get away with a lowball. Don't the valves become a problem if you're bagging it all the time?

DomesticBoy
11-27-2008, 09:53 PM
not 100% sure
ive only had one 5.0 and never had the chance to bag on it nor see to its extent the problems that come with the motor, mine had 243k and it seemed to have no problems with the engine
i couldnt imagine 265k tho:dunno:
see how much u could get away with the car
body seems in good condition, not liking the mismatched svt wheels at the front and cobras at the back tho haha

johnboy27
11-28-2008, 02:33 AM
Originally posted by DomesticBoy
not 100% sure
ive only had one 5.0 and never had the chance to bag on it nor see to its extent the problems that come with the motor, mine had 243k and it seemed to have no problems with the engine
i couldnt imagine 265k tho:dunno:
see how much u could get away with the car
body seems in good condition, not liking the mismatched svt wheels at the front and cobras at the back tho haha
It's got a V8 in it, 265k is fuck all. Most cabs are 4-500,000 km's minimum. 302's are easy to come by. Make sure the body is good and it runs decent, for 4000 if the body is good and you can get a year out of the engine you will have gotten your moneys worth. Parts are not hard to find for these cars. You could probably find a short block 302 for a couple hundred dollars and then swap all the accessories off this engine and complete the swap in a day or two . The key with these cars is to make sure they are not twisted to shit when you buy them. If it has a sunroof look for creases around the sunroof as well as inside the hatch areas.