PDA

View Full Version : Family Files Lawsuit Against Toyota



Eleanor
03-12-2009, 10:34 AM
Family Files Lawsuit Against Toyota for Their Son's Death Due to Faulty Steering Rod

LOS ANGELES, March 11 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Nearly three years after the Japanese government refused to prosecute Toyota executives for concealing a steering rod relay defect until after a horrific accident occurred in Japan, O'Reilly & Danko has filed a Complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of the late Levi Stewart's parents. Levi Stewart died on September 15, 2007 when his Toyota truck's steering relay rod snapped and he crashed, due to the total loss of steering control. Levi was killed, and his friends were seriously injured.

The Stewarts contend that Toyota should have issued the recall in the mid-1990s when Toyota first learned that steering rod relays were snapping, causing injuries and accidents due to the loss of steering. Had the Toyota executives issued the recall then, the Stewarts believe that Levi Stewart would be alive today. The Stewarts never received notice of either the Japanese or the later U.S. recall.

In 2004, local police in Komamoto, Japan investigated a frightening accident when the steering relay rod in a Toyota Hilux Surf (4-Runner) snapped, causing it to cross a median and strike another vehicle head-on. The police learned that Toyota executives had known since the mid 1990s that the steering rods were defective, but had refused to issue a recall then. Only after the media storm from Komamoto did Toyota issue a recall, but only in Japan, and not any other country in which their vehicles were sold.

Toyota knew that it had installed this same part, the defective steering relay rod, into nearly 1 million vehicles in the United States. In 2004, Toyota told the U.S. government it "had received field information from the Japanese market but no similar information from the U.S. Market had been received." This was untrue. O'Reilly & Danko's investigation has uncovered multiple accidents caused by the defective relay rods, which had been reported to Toyota or their dealers before the Japanese recall. The lawsuit alleges that Toyota, in fact, had notice of steering rods failing in the United States, when they told NHTSA otherwise. O'Reilly & Danko's investigation continues at www.ToyotaSteeringRecall.com.

Toyota eventually issued a recall in the United States in 2005, but due to the lackadaisical effort by Toyota only approximately 32% of the trucks were repaired after a year and a half. The generally accepted pass/fail rate for automotive recalls is 70%. "32% may be acceptable for the Red Sox lead off hitter. For an automotive recall where drivers can lose steering, it's an utter failure," said their attorney, John P. Kristensen of O'Reilly & Danko.

As a leading plaintiff's law firm, O'Reilly & Danko has won more multimillion-dollar jury verdicts than any other plaintiff's law firm in Northern California. Based in San Mateo, CA, O'Reilly & Danko has fought to secure fair compensation for their clients in virtually every form of tort litigation. Whether the opponent is a major airline, an automobile manufacturer, or a manufacturer of some other consumer product, O'Reilly & Danko has battled to expose the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable to their victims since 1987. http://sev.prnewswire.com/auto/20090311/DC8227511032009-1.html

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/12/video-toyota-grilled-over-possible-truck-recall-coverup/

kevie88
03-12-2009, 10:38 AM
meh, it's probably cheaper for them to pay the wrongful death lawsuits than it is to issue a recall.

Not to sound callous, but this is the way the auto industry operates. I think every manufacturer has had a major safety defect they knew about and did nothing to fix because it was too expensive. It's cheaper in the long run to take your chances and just pay the victims' families.

Eleanor
03-12-2009, 10:42 AM
Originally posted by kevie88
meh, it's probably cheaper for them to pay the wrongful death lawsuits than it is to issue a recall. See Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.

sputnik
03-12-2009, 10:58 AM
Originally posted by kevie88
meh, it's probably cheaper for them to pay the wrongful death lawsuits than it is to issue a recall.

Not to sound callous, but this is the way the auto industry operates. I think every manufacturer has had a major safety defect they knew about and did nothing to fix because it was too expensive. It's cheaper in the long run to take your chances and just pay the victims' families.

Wasn't there a Nicholas Cage movie about that or something?

Kloubek
03-12-2009, 11:03 AM
Originally posted by sputnik


Wasn't there a Nicholas Cage movie about that or something?

I think you might be thinking of "Fight Club", where Edward Norton's character does that for a living.

"You take the population of vehicles in the field (A) and multiply it by the probable rate of failure (B), then multiply the result by the average cost of an out-of-court settlement (C).

A times B times C equals X. This is what it will cost if we don't initiate a recall."

atgilchrist
03-12-2009, 12:03 PM
And if X is less than the cost of the recall and fix, then the recall isn't done.

rumeo
03-12-2009, 12:06 PM
Originally posted by Eleanor
See Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.

Cole's notes?

Eleanor
03-12-2009, 12:09 PM
^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Pinto#Safety_problems_and_scandal

Redlyne_mr2
03-12-2009, 12:11 PM
Originally posted by Kloubek


I think you might be thinking of "Fight Club", where Edward Norton's character does that for a living.

"You take the population of vehicles in the field (A) and multiply it by the probable rate of failure (B), then multiply the result by the average cost of an out-of-court settlement (C).

A times B times C equals X. This is what it will cost if we don't initiate a recall."
yep i was going to say... Fight club formula was definitely a factor in this scenario.

Sad that people had to die from this.

Aleks
03-12-2009, 12:15 PM
Originally posted by kevie88
meh, it's probably cheaper for them to pay the wrongful death lawsuits than it is to issue a recall.

Not to sound callous, but this is the way the auto industry operates. I think every manufacturer has had a major safety defect they knew about and did nothing to fix because it was too expensive. It's cheaper in the long run to take your chances and just pay the victims' families.

And IMO if it could be proven that they knew about the issue and did nothing the people in charge at the time should be sent to jail.

Eleanor
03-12-2009, 12:43 PM
Originally posted by Aleks
And IMO if it could be proven that they knew about the issue and did nothing the people in charge at the time should be sent to jail. Yep. I just found it funny that the Ford Pinto was a huge issue and yet this is a couple years old and I've never heard mention of it before.

blownz
03-12-2009, 01:05 PM
^ Toyota can do no wrong, and Ford can't do anything right. lol

Eleanor
03-12-2009, 01:27 PM
Originally posted by blownz
^ Toyota can do no wrong, and Ford can't do anything right. lol :rofl:

I actually originally wrote "Toyota can do no wrong" at the end of that post, but edited it before posting, haha.

Alpine Autowerks
03-12-2009, 07:08 PM
Originally posted by Eleanor
See Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.

yes she was horribly burt but the stupid cow had just filled her pinto up and when she realized she left the gas cap on the roof of the car she pulled a u-turn on the interstate and got rear ended by a full size van she cut off... but only Ford was found to be at fault by the first jury...