May's "Post Your Latest Picture" Thread [Archive] - Beyond.ca - Car Forums

Phihalo

05-01-2009, 11:35 AM

Here's mine

http://photos-b.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/v2061/209/90/623800416/n623800416_5732009_7869.jpg

http://photos-d.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v650/209/90/623800416/n623800416_5309931_128.jpg
lol'd :eek: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

http://photos-c.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v650/209/90/623800416/n623800416_5309930_9785.jpg

D'z Nutz

05-01-2009, 02:00 PM

Originally posted by KKY
Sold the 5D Mk2 and got this instead.

Nice, did you need any adapters to make the lens fit?

BerserkerCatSplat

05-01-2009, 02:15 PM

Originally posted by D'z Nutz

Nice, did you need any adapters to make the lens fit?

Looks like a Canon IV, so both the cam and lens should be M39 mount. No adapters needed! :D

KKY

05-01-2009, 05:44 PM

Originally posted by BerserkerCatSplat

Looks like a Canon IV, so both the cam and lens should be M39 mount. No adapters needed! :D

Yeah. Leica screw mount. No adapters needed. This one is the Canon IIIa. No flash sync. Took me a bit of looking around to figure that out.

Bukka

05-01-2009, 08:18 PM

Shot on Fuji Neopan 400 with a Canonet QL17 GIII

This is from the first roll of film that actually made it through developing.
So this is the first time I can actually see how the rangefinder framing really works, to strengthen my compositions in the future with this camera.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3616/3493088156_9968414018.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3340/3492270013_2833938c08.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3338/3492269925_95e3fc504d.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3408/3492270123_89fedbfa2d.jpg

Go4Long

05-02-2009, 01:31 AM

playing with off camera flashes(thanks mike)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3320/3492801937_07caa5e604_o.jpg

Errol.

05-02-2009, 02:00 AM

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3583/3493645564_c637a6b598_b.jpg

D'z Nutz

05-02-2009, 09:41 AM

Originally posted by BerserkerCatSplat

Looks like a Canon IV, so both the cam and lens should be M39 mount. No adapters needed! :D

Originally posted by KKY

Yeah. Leica screw mount. No adapters needed. This one is the Canon IIIa. No flash sync. Took me a bit of looking around to figure that out.

Ah, I wasn't aware the Canon rangefinders were M39 mount. Sweeeeet

Originally posted by Bukka
Shot on Fuji Neopan 400 with a Canonet QL17 GIII

This is from the first roll of film that actually made it through developing.
So this is the first time I can actually see how the rangefinder framing really works, to strengthen my compositions in the future with this camera.

Nice, did you do your own developing? I especially like #3.

That reminds me, I have a bunch of scanning that needs to be done...
:zzz:

achca

05-02-2009, 09:56 AM

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b360/achca/IMG_2209.jpg

PureDeXteritY

05-03-2009, 04:15 AM

First time really playing with night shots on the SLR and first time EVER playing with Manual mode, any comments or suggestions would be helpful.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3622/3496835660_f4b0f636cb_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3619/3496794040_b618a4a883_b.jpg

smc

05-03-2009, 08:27 AM

PureDeXteritY, love the deefoot pic.

mboldt

05-03-2009, 06:22 PM

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b207/mboldt/DSC_5488copy.jpg

Melinda

05-04-2009, 12:50 AM

Some early edits from my first shoot with the 5D

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y154/Syryda/Hollie1.jpg

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y154/Syryda/Hollie2.jpg

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y154/Syryda/Hollie3.jpg

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y154/Syryda/Rollieandlucas1.jpg

Go4Long

05-04-2009, 05:11 PM

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3640/3502712212_359d8b7bf5_o.jpg

flipstah

05-04-2009, 08:05 PM

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3369/3503114490_7f6313d504_o.jpg

After two years of not biking because of a broken jaw, I went back on the saddle today and man, it felt GOOD!

This is the new helmet I got and it's the first step back to returning. Now, off to BowCycle or Ridley's to get a new bike! :thumbsup:

Gibson

05-05-2009, 12:07 AM

Originally posted by achca
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b360/achca/IMG_2209.jpg

Just as a note, try not to put poles behind the subject of your photo...it's a little distracting.

Otherwise, good lighting.

bcylau

05-05-2009, 12:54 AM

new 5d pics....

every new camera has to take a picture of a bike

http://www.pbase.com/brianlau121/image/112166482/large.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/brianlau121/image/112166483/large.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/brianlau121/image/112166484/large.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/brianlau121/image/112166485/large.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/brianlau121/image/112166487/large.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/brianlau121/image/112166488/large.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/brianlau121/image/112166489/large.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/brianlau121/image/112166491/large.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/brianlau121/image/112166492/large.jpg

Sebasshole

05-05-2009, 01:16 AM

all those pictures are effin awsome good work guys

D'z Nutz

05-05-2009, 07:59 AM

Originally posted by Melinda
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y154/Syryda/Rollieandlucas1.jpg

Bwaha, Lucas is gonna learn how to count starting with the rule of 3rds, followed by f-stops :D

Originally posted by flipstah
This is the new helmet I got and it's the first step back to returning. Now, off to BowCycle or Ridley's to get a new bike! :thumbsup:

That's a pretty badass looking helmet! :hitit:

KKY

05-05-2009, 09:09 AM

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3390/3503869334_b95003facb_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/kennethkwan/3503869334/)

flipstah

05-05-2009, 10:08 AM

Originally posted by D'z Nutz
That's a pretty badass looking helmet! :hitit:

Haha thanks! It's a head turner for sure. Gotta get ready just in case the swine flu mutates into zombie swine flu. :rofl:

Hey Kenneth, where did you go for that train shot? It looks cool! And mildly dangerous.

KKY

05-05-2009, 11:35 AM

Originally posted by flipstah

Hey Kenneth, where did you go for that train shot? It looks cool! And mildly dangerous.
Right outside the Inglewood Bird Sanctuary. It's the end of the track. No fence or anything. After I was done, I saw a guy in a CN company car drove up and down the path beside the track. Not sure if he was patrolling the place or what.

Go4Long

05-05-2009, 07:14 PM

Originally posted by bcylau
[B]
http://www.pbase.com/brianlau121/image/112166483/large.jpg

hey...that's chelsea's ninja, I know her :poosie:

TDFTW

05-05-2009, 08:47 PM

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3661/3505418901_8d31a0ed4b_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3370/3506227504_2563db9a3c_o.jpg

I'll be doing an actual planned shoot with this car this was a random hey lets go take pix deal :nut:

riced

05-05-2009, 08:57 PM

Here's a shot I did of 4doorj's new Evo X

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3358/3506173814_9270ddf729.jpg

flipstah

05-05-2009, 08:57 PM

Originally posted by TDFTW
I'll be doing an actual planned shoot with this car this was a random hey lets go take pix deal :nut:

Genesis...:drool:

Gibson

05-06-2009, 01:32 AM

Originally posted by KKY
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3390/3503869334_b95003facb_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/kennethkwan/3503869334/)

Nice Bokeh!

soupey

05-06-2009, 05:13 AM

http://www.ucalgary.ca/~ypatel/beyond/may09/may1.jpg

achca

05-06-2009, 10:40 AM

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b360/achca/IMG_2531.jpg

mboldt

05-06-2009, 11:05 AM

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b207/mboldt/RearRig01WEB.jpg

bashir26

05-06-2009, 11:11 AM

^wow.

mboldt

05-06-2009, 11:37 AM

Front end shots on the way too.

mboldt

05-06-2009, 07:58 PM

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3659/3509102058_d691c88f5d_o.jpg

bashir26

05-06-2009, 08:04 PM

Both pictures give a sense of calm, simple, but aggressive at the same time. I love these two photos!

Try sending the images to BMW, they are seriously unreal

TDFTW

05-06-2009, 08:35 PM

What I wouldn't give to have a rig setup like yours right now Mike.

Kona9

05-06-2009, 08:43 PM

Originally posted by TDFTW
What I wouldn't give to have a rig setup like yours right now Mike.

What I wouldn't give to have that talent!!

TDFTW

05-06-2009, 08:46 PM

Originally posted by Kona9

What I wouldn't give to have that talent!! You are good at photoshopping cars? :dunno:

mboldt

05-06-2009, 09:44 PM

Originally posted by TDFTW
You are good at photoshopping cars? :dunno:

LOL The hate already starts for this year. The rig isn't much different from anyone elses, you can readily purchase everything that was used, so until you have better reasons to not have shots like this, leave it alone.

bashir26

05-06-2009, 10:27 PM

what's a rig?

mboldt

05-06-2009, 10:31 PM

Originally posted by bashir26
what's a rig?

Two suction cups, some clamps, a pole, and the camera goes on the end of it, car drives along, you photoshop out the rig, viola! motion blur from extreme angles.

D'z Nutz

05-06-2009, 10:39 PM

http://www.typicalfish.com/blog/images/20090423B_014_.jpg

TDFTW

05-06-2009, 10:54 PM

Originally posted by mboldt

LOL The hate already starts for this year. The rig isn't much different from anyone elses, you can readily purchase everything that was used, so until you have better reasons to not have shots like this, leave it alone. Looks like somebody doesn't know how to interpret things and is a little cocky / full of themselves.

mboldt

05-06-2009, 10:58 PM

Originally posted by TDFTW
Looks like somebody doesn't know how to interpret things and is a little cocky / full of themselves.

...lol

My interpretations are based on your post on Nex about the shots, now on here, and how you were last year.

I'm not trying to be cocky what so ever. I'm just being defensive that's it.

Not looking to start a war.

TDFTW

05-06-2009, 11:02 PM

Originally posted by mboldt

...lol

My interpretations are based on your post on Nex about the shots, now on here, and how you were last year.

I'm not trying to be cocky what so ever. I'm just being defensive that's it.

Not looking to start a war. My comment on nex? You posted photos looking for critique, since when is a person not allowed to say their opinion when it's asked for.

I'm not apologising, those bmw shots look cut/pasted into the background. That's how I see it. So I will say it.

And "now on here"???? I love how I didn't say shit about you in any negative fashion on here. We all do our OWN things. Some of us actually stray from the norm.

Melinda

05-06-2009, 11:49 PM

Originally posted by achca
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b360/achca/IMG_2531.jpg
Love this photo. Is it a high enough quality that you can crop so you just see the aquarium with all of the people? Really neat effect none the less, good job! Where was this taken?

flipstah

05-06-2009, 11:53 PM

Originally posted by Melinda

Love this photo. Is it a high enough quality that you can crop so you just see the aquarium with all of the people? Really neat effect none the less, good job! Where was this taken?

I wanna say YVR but great shot nevertheless!

bashir26

05-07-2009, 09:16 AM

^ Looks like Vancouvers airport

soupey

05-07-2009, 10:44 AM

Originally posted by mboldt
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b207/mboldt/RearRig01WEB.jpg

The front wheel needs to be cut out better i think, looks like a chunk of it was missed when u cut it from the background.

mboldt

05-07-2009, 04:11 PM

That's the shadow beside the wheel actually!

I can give you a 100% crop when I get home =P

soupey

05-07-2009, 05:32 PM

ah ic, looks nice otherwise, what was the original like? gray concrete? the combo between the white of the car and the altered background makes it stand out quite well in my opinion!

the car could use a little more blue, or the background could be warmed up, just to make the colour temp match up a bit better...the car looks like ti was desaturated, none of the reflections show any blue that the background has in it, just a minor thing i guess, might make it look better together better tho...

New Direction

05-07-2009, 11:48 PM

Thought I'd throw one up from this afternoon. I set it up pretty quickly just to see how the flash would freeze action with a slower shutter speed
1/50th @ F4
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3355/3511579103_6d99293061_o.jpg

KKY

05-08-2009, 01:54 PM

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3589/3511436942_ee9ca2fe85_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/kennethkwan/3511436942/)

achca

05-08-2009, 09:15 PM

Ekliptix

05-09-2009, 09:23 AM

Ireland is great.

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/Ekliptix/Ireland%202009/cliffs1.jpg

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/Ekliptix/Ireland%202009/cliffs2.jpg

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/Ekliptix/Ireland%202009/cave2.jpg

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/Ekliptix/Ireland%202009/surf5.jpg

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/Ekliptix/Ireland%202009/surf4.jpg

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/Ekliptix/Ireland%202009/castle1-1.jpg

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/Ekliptix/Ireland%202009/door.jpg

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/Ekliptix
/Ireland%202009/town.jpg

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/Ekliptix/Ireland%202009/sceanery1.jpg

pinoyhero

05-09-2009, 09:27 AM

Dam nice pics guys ... im a total photo noob but just got myself a G10 for snapping shots ... any noob recommendations/tips?

soupey

05-09-2009, 11:31 AM

Go4Long

05-09-2009, 12:10 PM

much better with the crop, I'd like to see if you could recover some color in the top portion of the image too...but that's just me.

soupey

05-09-2009, 04:08 PM

Originally posted by Go4Long
much better with the crop, I'd like to see if you could recover some color in the top portion of the image too...but that's just me.

he sent me the original jpg photo, its kinda washed out above, i tried to increase the contrast a lil, take a second look...ive replaced the crop above

Go4Long

05-09-2009, 04:22 PM

that's gettin there...however that tank is lit it's gonna cause issues, I would say this is about as close as you're gonna get with what you've got in this case.

TDFTW

05-10-2009, 12:43 AM

Went out to Camore today had a blast.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3663/3517922540_180f8bb1ea_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3631/3517922380_7fa25e7023_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3380/3517922660_1f5a5f7039_o.jpg

Melinda

05-10-2009, 01:20 AM

Originally posted by TDFTW
Went out to Camore today had a blast.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3663/3517922540_180f8bb1ea_o.jpg

One suggestion. I know it's hard, but try to remember your rule of thirds, especially with photos like this. It would add a lot of interest to a photo like this to see more of the sky texture or more of the reflection and have the horizon line (leveled) on one of the "third" points rather than smack dab in the middle of the photo. Similar to your second photo. Throwing the horizon line lower made a much more dramatic photo. Just a tip!

TDFTW

05-10-2009, 02:38 AM

Originally posted by Melinda

One suggestion. I know it's hard, but try to remember your rule of thirds, especially with photos like this. It would add a lot of interest to a photo like this to see more of the sky texture or more of the reflection and have the horizon line (leveled) on one of the "third" points rather than smack dab in the middle of the photo. Similar to your second photo. Throwing the horizon line lower made a much more dramatic photo. Just a tip! Thanks! It's technically my first mountain shot lol.

soupey

05-10-2009, 08:49 AM

Originally posted by Melinda

One suggestion. I know it's hard, but try to remember your rule of thirds, especially with photos like this. It would add a lot of interest to a photo like this to see more of the sky texture or more of the reflection and have the horizon line (leveled) on one of the "third" points rather than smack dab in the middle of the photo. Similar to your second photo. Throwing the horizon line lower made a much more dramatic photo. Just a tip!

reminds me of a photo i took of the mountains by Lake Minnewanka, good ol canon s410 haha, i think it was just tempting to keep the rocks visible through the water.

http://www.ucalgary.ca/~ypatel/beyond/may09/old.jpg

Go4Long

05-10-2009, 09:33 AM

Originally posted by TDFTW

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3663/3517922540_180f8bb1ea_o.jpg

good shot dave...I think melinda's got the right idea for it to be better...did you have to play around with the exposure a whole bunch in post process? it just looks a little noisier than the others.

P.S. hard to tell with the reflections but it appears to need to be rotated a degree or so counter clockwise. just that little hair off.

TDFTW

05-10-2009, 12:39 PM

Originally posted by Go4Long

good shot dave...I think melinda's got the right idea for it to be better...did you have to play around with the exposure a whole bunch in post process? it just looks a little noisier than the others.

P.S. hard to tell with the reflections but it appears to need to be rotated a degree or so counter clockwise. just that little hair off. Yeah it turned out pretty noisy after the raw file was messed with. And i put a level against my screen, it actually is crooked a tiny bit lol

TDFTW

05-10-2009, 01:09 PM

Couple more.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3641/3519615388_da69593106_o.jpg

This mountain here I will be ascending in a couple months, late july early august. Going to be a blast.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3641/3518803117_bc47e9858b_o.jpg

Go4Long

05-10-2009, 01:25 PM

first one of the new set I think would be better with a longer DOF I think...the rock is cool, but I think the scene behind it is going to steal the show either way so it might as well be in focus.

TDFTW

05-10-2009, 02:01 PM

Originally posted by Go4Long
first one of the new set I think would be better with a longer DOF I think...the rock is cool, but I think the scene behind it is going to steal the show either way so it might as well be in focus. I only took one photo of that particular scene. So I guess we're stuck looking at the blur lol

89coupe

05-11-2009, 11:34 AM

Landscapes IMO should always be shot at F11

TDFTW

05-11-2009, 11:39 AM

Originally posted by 89coupe
Landscapes IMO should always be shot at F11 Landscapes should ALWAYS be panoramas, IMHO

Go4Long

05-11-2009, 11:43 AM

Originally posted by 89coupe
Landscapes IMO should always be shot at F11

seems fairly specific to say that a landscape should always be shot at F11 without knowing any of the other factors. I've seen plenty of long exposure landscapes shot at a much smaller aperture than F11 that were fuckin amazing...and no dave...most of them weren't panoramas :poosie:

well played :P

TDFTW

05-11-2009, 12:31 PM

Originally posted by Go4Long

seems fairly specific to say that a landscape should always be shot at F11 without knowing any of the other factors. I've seen plenty of long exposure landscapes shot at a much smaller aperture than F11 that were fuckin amazing...and no dave...most of them weren't panoramas :poosie:

well played :P :rofl:

89coupe

05-11-2009, 01:08 PM

Go4Long

05-11-2009, 01:21 PM

because a 30 second exposure at F11 when it's still light out is going to look like a blank image.

TDFTW

05-11-2009, 01:22 PM

:rofl:

89coupe

05-11-2009, 01:54 PM

Originally posted by Go4Long
because a 30 second exposure at F11 when it's still light out is going to look like a blank image.

Why would you shoot 30 sec of exposure at F11 during the day time?

The point I was making is, landscapes should have everything in focus, ie. F11 or higher.

Go4Long

05-11-2009, 01:58 PM

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/770939

F/18 first one is 40 seconds...second one is 30.

there's a big difference between saying they should always be shot at F/11 which is what you originally said...and saying they should be shot at F/11 or higher.

89coupe

05-11-2009, 02:13 PM

Originally posted by Go4Long
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/770939

F/18 first one is 40 seconds...second one is 30.

there's a big difference between saying they should always be shot at F/11 which is what you originally said...and saying they should be shot at F/11 or higher.

Why would anyone need to go higher then F11?

Melinda

05-11-2009, 02:24 PM

Originally posted by 89coupe
Landscapes IMO should always be shot at F11

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: I love how photography is so cookie cutter to you, Brad.

Originally posted by 89coupe

Why would you shoot 30 sec of exposure at F11 during the day time?

Long exposure during the day? It's not rocket science, here's a few off the top of my head that I've done that needed a lot of extra time.

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y154/Syryda/20web.jpg

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y154/Syryda/15web.jpg

BerserkerCatSplat

05-11-2009, 02:40 PM

Originally posted by 89coupe

What does long exposure have to do with aperture?

:rofl: Best quote yet.

89coupe

05-11-2009, 02:41 PM

You guys love to split hairs hey...lol

Those photos appear to be shot in a wooded forest with no direct sunlight.

They are also not landscape photos IMO but subject.

Of course you need an elapsed time in order to get the soft water effect.

We were talking "LANDSCAPES"

I've shot many F11 photos with around 20sec of exposure in the dead of night with plenty of light absorbed.

The idea of shooting 30sec of exposure in the middle of the day seems obsurd unless you are using some sort of filter.

That was why I asked the question.

dr_jared88

05-11-2009, 02:47 PM

Originally posted by 89coupe
You guys love to split hairs hey...lol

Those photos appear to be shot in a wooded forest with no direct sunlight.

They are also not landscape photos IMO but subject.

Of course you need an elapsed time in order to get the soft water effect.

We were talking "LANDSCAPES"

I've shot many F11 photos with around 20sec of exposure in the dead of night with plenty of light absorbed.

The idea of shooting 30sec of exposure in the middle of the day seems obsurd unless you are using some sort of filter.

That was why I asked the question.

If all people shot pictures all with the same settings, all pictures would so similar. There would never be anything new, and we might as well use a point and shoot....

Go4Long

05-11-2009, 02:55 PM

Originally posted by 89coupe

The idea of shooting 30sec of exposure in the middle of the day seems obsurd unless you are using some sort of filter.

all depends on the look you're going for...and yes...absolutely possible you might be shooting with a combination of filters...

89coupe

05-11-2009, 02:59 PM

Originally posted by Go4Long

all depends on the look you're going for...and yes...absolutely possible you might be shooting with a combination of filters...

Unless its dark out, the idea of shooting 30sec of exposure during the day with F11 is completely obsurd.

All you would get is a white wash of nothing.

Unless like I said, you had some serious filters on to block out all the light.

mboldt

05-11-2009, 05:29 PM

Those serious filters are called Neutral Density Filters.

The_Rural_Juror

05-11-2009, 06:25 PM

Originally posted by 89coupe

Unless its dark out, the idea of shooting 30sec of exposure during the day with F11 is completely obsurd.

You're right it's obsurd! :rofl:

One may wonder why one would spend a lot of money on the 17-55 when most of the shots are taken at F11. Even the $130 50mm F1.8 would be fairly close in sharpness at that aperture.

Welcome back 89coupe!
:clap: :clap: :rofl:

mboldt

05-11-2009, 06:28 PM

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b207/mboldt/DSC_9985.jpg

89coupe

05-11-2009, 08:23 PM

Originally posted by mboldt
Those serious filters are called Neutral Density Filters.

Yes I know.

I own this one.

http://www.singh-ray.com/varind.html

soupey

05-11-2009, 08:44 PM

Originally posted by 89coupe

Yes I know.

I own this one.

http://www.singh-ray.com/varind.html

yikes haha, so much money for a sunglass filter:nut:

im so happy i'll be able to make these at school if i want later next year.

Go4Long

05-11-2009, 09:37 PM

Originally posted by 89coupe

Yes I know.

I own this one.

http://www.singh-ray.com/varind.html

so you spent $330 US on a ND filter and don't understand why people would want to use a longer exposure? :nut: so the question is...what on earth do you think that fuckin filter is for?

TDFTW

05-11-2009, 11:18 PM

Originally posted by Go4Long

so you spent $330 US on a ND filter and don't understand why people would want to use a longer exposure? :nut: so the question is...what on earth do you think that fuckin filter is for? To say that he spent $400 on a filter.

Some people love to have the most expensive gear they can get their hands on and have no idea what they actually own!

Melinda

05-12-2009, 12:01 AM

TDFTW

05-12-2009, 12:28 AM

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3239/3524899294_318656f9c5.jpg

Bukka

05-12-2009, 12:38 AM

LOL @ 300+ for a ND
I have a friend and he wont using anything short of B+W everything..just because he wants the "baller" factor when he walks around.

djayz

05-12-2009, 01:02 AM

Originally posted by TDFTW
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3239/3524899294_318656f9c5.jpg

Nice shot but one thing I noticed on alot of your photos was the tilt. It's okay on some but on others it's extreme and others unnecessary. Just some constructive critism just bring the photo out about 10-15 degrees and I think it'll look great :thumbsup:

BerserkerCatSplat

05-12-2009, 09:05 AM

Originally posted by Go4Long

so you spent $330 US on a ND filter

To be accurate, he spend $400 on two circular polarizers stacked on top of each other - that's all a Vari-ND is.

Go4Long

05-12-2009, 09:15 AM

I guess I'm not one to talk about spending money on gear...I just picked up a 70-200 2.8 yesterday...but at least I know what to use it for :poosie:

ThE tV 8 mE

05-12-2009, 10:09 AM

Been a while since I got to shoot last, so I was pretty excited to do this!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3353/3525091603_ab4ed943ef_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3601/3525091671_dbd9cbf08e_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3612/3525105455_bd36543f1c_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3400/3525897170_f43970c19d_o.jpg