Noel quits again. Oasis is done...for now

[dino_martini]

It's with some sadness and great relief to tell you that I quit Oasis tonight. People will write and say what they like, but I simply could not go on working with Liam a day longer.

Apparently Liam and Noel had a heated argument. They will reunite...they always do

[sr20s14zenki]

I hope they shut down. They suck giant donkey dick.

[Grogador]

Originally posted by sr20s14zenki
blah blah blah the universe revolves around me

Anyway... Oasis is played out and Noel can do better on his own. IMHO.

[Kennyredline]

They're both a right couple of total WANKERS.

[Grogador]

Originally posted by Kennyredline
They're both a right couple of total WANKERS.

...that I can't argue with :P

[finboy]

word is liam smashed noels guitar, and judging by latest performances it was his main stage guitar, a mid 60's gibson 355.

on the upside, noel can finally get around to that solo album. he is one of the greatest pop song writers since the mid 90's without question.

[Jlude]

Originally posted by finboy


on the upside, noel can finally get around to that solo album. he is one of the greatest pop song writers since the mid 90's without question.

agreed

[revelations]

Originally posted by sr20s14zenki
I hope they shut down. They suck giant donkey dick.

These guys are two of the biggest "tossers" around.

[zipdoa]

Oasis is/was fucking massive, and they always will be. I predict 10-years minimum before a reunion tour.

I think this is too bad... Liam was starting to get his live vocals back, and the last show I saw in Calgary was pretty excellent considering we had... well we had lots of albertans in the crowd that's for sure.

[Mckenzie]

Originally posted by finboy
word is liam smashed noels guitar, and judging by latest performances it was his main stage guitar, a mid 60's gibson 355.

on the upside, noel can finally get around to that solo album. he is one of the greatest pop song writers since the mid 90's without question.

:werd:

No band from the 90s comes even close to matching the songwriting ability and success of Oasis. They already are in history books and will stay there, despite the personal differences of the members and gong show they tend to be.

[heavyD]

Originally posted by dino_martini


Apparently Liam and Noel had a heated argument. They will reunite...they always do [/B]

If there is a god they won't. Oasis is to music as OJ Simpson is to husbands.

[finboy]

Originally posted by heavyD


If there is a god they won't. Oasis is to music as OJ Simpson is to husbands.

aren't you a huge nu metal fan? :dunno:

[heavyD]

Originally posted by finboy


aren't you a huge nu metal fan? :dunno:

Rock and heavy metal but I'm flexible that I will listen to some pop musicians if they have talent. Oasis is pure syrup pop music.

[LadyLuck]

OASIS split because NOEL GALLAGHER never forgave brother LIAM for jokingly suggesting he was not the real dad of daughter ANAIS.

Why Oasis split (http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/showbiz/xs/479145/Why-Oasis-split.html)

[sr20s14zenki]

Originally posted by Grogador


Anyway... Oasis is played out and Noel can do better on his own. IMHO.


Oh im sorry....did you have a mancrush on him or something?

forums are for the sharing of ideas/opinion, i shared MY opinion....deal with it.

[Neil4Speed]

Wow, there is some super hate on for Oasis - have you guys been hearing too many bad covers of wonderwall or something??

Its a shame about the split, but give it enough time - they will come back together.

[2Valve0]

:whocares:

[banned3x]

i honestly never heard of anyone/band mentioned in this thread.
maybe i heard someof there songs on the radio but dont know who they are.

so....:whocares:

[Neil4Speed]

Originally posted by banned3x
i honestly never heard of anyone/band mentioned in this thread.
maybe i heard someof there songs on the radio but dont know who they are.

so....:whocares:

Thats because your ignorant about music.

[finboy]

Originally posted by Neil4Speed


Thats because your ignorant about music.

welcome to calgary, where this is considered cultured...

http://www.rivercityvibe.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/truck20nutz.jpg

:angel:

[nonlinear]

who cares, oasis sucks.

[Jlude]

Originally posted by finboy


welcome to calgary, where this is considered cultured...

http://www.rivercityvibe.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/truck20nutz.jpg

:angel:
true true

:rofl: :rofl:

[Mibz]

Decent trolling so far. Keep it up.

[95teetee]

Originally posted by Neil4Speed
Wow, there is some super hate on for Oasis - have you guys been hearing too many bad covers of wonderwall or something??
worse than the original you mean?
:dunno:

[Danny Meehan]

Noel is with the Oasis like Anne Heche is with lesbianism

I'm IN ! OUT! IN
OUT

[zipdoa]

lol, i'm guessing most of the oasis haters are nickelback fans. rock on.

[finboy]

http://img.moronail.net/img/5/7/1257.jpg

[heavyD]

Originally posted by zipdoa
lol, i'm guessing most of the oasis haters are nickelback fans. rock on.

I hate Nickelback far more than Oasis but come on man, they are just another 90's band which happened to be one of the least significant decades in music after the current decade which is hopefully rock bottom. Woo Hoo we were one of the best pop bands in a decade where Mickey Mouse club singers & boy bands were prominent.:rolleyes:

[Neil4Speed]

Originally posted by heavyD


I hate Nickelback far more than Oasis but come on man, they are just another 90's band which happened to be one of the least significant decades in music after the current decade which is hopefully rock bottom. Woo Hoo we were one of the best pop bands in a decade where Mickey Mouse club singers & boy bands were prominent.:rolleyes:

Comparing Oasis with the Backstreet Boys ("boy bands") is a pretty daft. You have to understand that albums like Definitely Maybe and Whats the Story Morning Glory are timeless and will go down as some of the best albums of all time - have you listened to them?

http://www.nme.com/news/oasis/23227

[heavyD]

Originally posted by Neil4Speed


Comparing Oasis with the Backstreet Boys ("boy bands") is a pretty daft. You have to understand that albums like Definitely Maybe and Whats the Story Morning Glory are timeless and will go down as some of the best albums of all time - have you listened to them?

http://www.nme.com/news/oasis/23227

I didn't compare them with the Backstreet boys, I said the decade was so weak that anything decent would stand out and that list is nice and all but it's British and for every article like that I can add five of these; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1210152/JAMES-DELINGPOLE-Oasis-vulgar-hyped-talented-face-yob-Britain.html In fact it's an insult to Radiohead, the Beatles, and Nirvana to have Oasis placed higher on any list. I have spent a lot of time listening from music from the 70's, 80's, 90's and I can understand a younger person that grew up on 90's music thinking that Oasis was great but if you have been listening to music longer you would understand that they are nothing more than good, not great and very overrated.

[zipdoa]

Originally posted by heavyD


I didn't compare them with the Backstreet boys, I said the decade was so weak that anything decent would stand out and that list is nice and all but it's British and for every article like that I can add five of these; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1210152/JAMES-DELINGPOLE-Oasis-vulgar-hyped-talented-face-yob-Britain.html In fact it's an insult to Radiohead, the Beatles, and Nirvana to have Oasis placed higher on any list. I have spent a lot of time listening from music from the 70's, 80's, 90's and I can understand a younger person that grew up on 90's music thinking that Oasis was great but if you have been listening to music longer you would understand that they are nothing more than good, not great and very overrated.

Have you listened to DM and WTSMG?

The hype came from DM and exploded through WTSMG. There's a reason why they can keep on selling out stadiums more than 15 years after their debut album, and it's cause they put on a sick fucking show.

MC Hammer, vanilla ice <-- these two artists were overrated and hyped in their day, and it shows now cause they play venues like tantra and flames central :rolleyes:

[masoncgy]

Originally posted by heavyD
I have spent a lot of time listening from music from the 70's, 80's, 90's and I can understand a younger person that grew up on 90's music thinking that Oasis was great but if you have been listening to music longer you would understand that they are nothing more than good, not great and very overrated.

QFT.

That said, one's musical preference is usually never exactly the same as anyone else, as this thread so glaringly proves.

Let's drop the "I know what good music is and you don't" crap.. because really... it's an argument you'll never win.

When I heard about this recent break up all I could think was "oh great, now I have to hear about these douchebags again."

It is what it is.

[finboy]

Originally posted by heavyD


I didn't compare them with the Backstreet boys, I said the decade was so weak that anything decent would stand out and that list is nice and all but it's British and for every article like that I can add five of these; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1210152/JAMES-DELINGPOLE-Oasis-vulgar-hyped-talented-face-yob-Britain.html In fact it's an insult to Radiohead, the Beatles, and Nirvana to have Oasis placed higher on any list. I have spent a lot of time listening from music from the 70's, 80's, 90's and I can understand a younger person that grew up on 90's music thinking that Oasis was great but if you have been listening to music longer you would understand that they are nothing more than good, not great and very overrated.

the late 80's/ early 90's were one of the biggest times for music since the late 60's for music development, i'm not sure why you think they were so terrible.

[Mckenzie]

Regardless of musical tastes, the major difference with Oasis and their success is Noel's song writing / composing ability. No band from the 90s could match the complex compositions / arrangements that oasis did. Many of their songs were 5 mins plus, with many different instruments, styles, guest players (such as Jonny Depp) key changes, layers, bridges, etc. I still have yet to see a band since that has anywhere close to the complexity in arrangements as they did.

And I prefer music from the 60s and 70s, which are WAY more complex than any of the shit out today. That is why I can appreciate the ability of Noel as a song-writer and composer as it is heavily influenced by a period in music that drew on many different influences and styles to create original and complex music.

There is nothing typically 'pop' about an Oasis song. I think the perception is from people who only listen to the radio stuff, which is good at best. The golden gems are found in their albums, which is the EXACT same as the Rolling Stones...all their crap and pop is found on the radio, which kinda sucks, whereas all of their best music is found in the album in a similar style of composition to Oasis.

[heavyD]

Originally posted by finboy


the late 80's/ early 90's were one of the biggest times for music since the late 60's for music development, i'm not sure why you think they were so terrible.

The only thing of significance that came out of the early 90's was grunge primarily Pearl Jam, Nirvana, Alice in Chains, & Soundgarden and a little different direction in the Red Hot Chilli Peppers who are a good not great band. I don't count MC Hammer as development and post grunge stuff like Collective Soul, Creed sucked as did all the Green Day wannabes. REM was significant but they started in the 80's as did No Doubt.

The decade got significantly weaker as it progressed to the point now where nobody buys music anymore and digital media isn't solely to blame for that.

[heavyD]

Originally posted by Mckenzie
Regardless of musical tastes, the major difference with Oasis and their success is Noel's song writing / composing ability. No band from the 90s could match the complex compositions / arrangements that oasis did. Many of their songs were 5 mins plus, with many different instruments, styles, guest players (such as Jonny Depp) key changes, layers, bridges, etc. I still have yet to see a band since that has anywhere close to the complexity in arrangements as they did.

And I prefer music from the 60s and 70s, which are WAY more complex than any of the shit out today. That is why I can appreciate the ability of Noel as a song-writer and composer as it is heavily influenced by a period in music that drew on many different influences and styles to create original and complex music.

There is nothing typically 'pop' about an Oasis song. I think the perception is from people who only listen to the radio stuff, which is good at best. The golden gems are found in their albums, which is the EXACT same as the Rolling Stones...all their crap and pop is found on the radio, which kinda sucks, whereas all of their best music is found in the album in a similar style of composition to Oasis.

It's all personal opinion. I personally find one of the more popular groups ever U2 extremely overrated. Two very good records surrounded by some very average stuff.

[Mckenzie]

Originally posted by heavyD


The only thing of significance that came out of the early 90's was grunge primarily Pearl Jam, Nirvana, Alice in Chains, &amp; Soundgarden and a little different direction in the Red Hot Chilli Peppers who are a good not great band. I don't count MC Hammer as development. REM was significant but they started in the 80's as did No Doubt.

The decade got significantly weaker as it progressed to the point now where nobody buys music anymore and digital media isn't solely to blame for that.

Agreed.


Originally posted by heavyD


It's all personal opinion. I personally find one of the more popular groups ever U2 extremely overrated. Two very good records surrounded by some very average stuff.

Agreed.

My observation, as a musician, and someone who has studied different musical styles at an academic level is that they were not in the same mold as a typical band with 3.5 min cookie cutter songs. That is why I feel they have been able to sustain success for 20 years, break records and continue to sell millions of records.

Regardless of my enjoyment of their music, objectively I can see why they are as successful as they are.

[finboy]

Originally posted by heavyD


The only thing of significance that came out of the early 90's was grunge primarily Pearl Jam, Nirvana, Alice in Chains, &amp; Soundgarden and a little different direction in the Red Hot Chilli Peppers who are a good not great band. I don't count MC Hammer as development and post grunge stuff like Collective Soul, Creed sucked as did all the Green Day wannabes. REM was significant but they started in the 80's as did No Doubt.

The decade got significantly weaker as it progressed to the point now where nobody buys music anymore and digital media isn't solely to blame for that.

just off the top of my head they following genre's hit it big in the late 80's/90's...
-grunge (not a great description, none of the seattle bands really sounded alike)
-electronica
-rap/hip hop
-madchester/baggy
-britpop
-noise rock
-shoegaze
-pop-punk/california punk
-industrial
-garage rock
-etc.

most have their roots in earlier times, but the 90's is when they all finally broke through to the main stream. the later 90's turned pretty terrible but i would hardly use that as a guage of the decade as a whole.

[atgilchrist]

Originally posted by Mckenzie
Regardless of musical tastes, the major difference with Oasis and their success is Noel's song writing / composing ability. No band from the 90s could match the complex compositions / arrangements that oasis did. Many of their songs were 5 mins plus, with many different instruments, styles, guest players (such as Jonny Depp) key changes, layers, bridges, etc. I still have yet to see a band since that has anywhere close to the complexity in arrangements as they did.



Radiohead:dunno: OK Computer is still one of my favorite albums.

Oh, and nickelback. (I kid, i kid).