Porsche 997 Turbo PDK vs Audi R8 V10 E-Gear

[trev0006]

Porsche 997 Turbo PDK vs Audi R8 V10 E-Gear (http://www.dpccars.com/car-videos-10/05-08-10page-Porsche-997-Turbo-PDK-vs-Audi-R8-V10-E-Gear.htm) Rolling race.

[dirtsniffer]

i thought the tranny in the audi was r-tronic? :nut:

[Khalil.e]

Porsche has it right - there is a replacement for displacement.

[syeve]

Yah, they replace 4 cyl with two giant turbo's that suck fuel and increase maintenance intervals. Give me NA any day.

[xrayvsn]

Originally posted by syeve
Yah, they replace 4 cyl with two giant turbo's that suck fuel and increase maintenance intervals. Give me NA any day.

Maintenance is once every 2 years, or 20,000 km.

I get 12.2 L/100km mixed driving and I have seen as low as 7.8 L/100 km on the highway on my 997.1TT, and my car is not stock.

The 997.2TT with PDK is supposed to be better on fuel than the 3.6L in the previous gen, but who buys these cars for fuel economy?

[C4S]

Originally posted by xrayvsn


Maintenance is once every 2 years, or 20,000 km.

I get 12.2 L/100km mixed driving and I have seen as low as 7.8 L/100 km on the highway on my 997.1TT, and my car is not stock.

The 997.2TT with PDK is supposed to be better on fuel than the 3.6L in the previous gen, but who buys these cars for fuel economy?


This is the first time I heard people say 997 T is high mainten ... and suck on gas ... lol :eek:

[C4S]

]

[syeve]

Originally posted by xrayvsn


Maintenance is once every 2 years, or 20,000 km.

I get 12.2 L/100km mixed driving and I have seen as low as 7.8 L/100 km on the highway on my 997.1TT, and my car is not stock.

The 997.2TT with PDK is supposed to be better on fuel than the 3.6L in the previous gen, but who buys these cars for fuel economy?

Really? That is good times.