PDA

View Full Version : Because killing her boyfreind didn't work....



Kennyredline
08-17-2011, 12:15 PM
.....so I'm sure a $2300 fine will teach her.
:facepalm:
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Drunk+driver+caused+boyfriend+death+fined+second+offence/5263111/story.html

CALGARY — A woman who avoided jail two months ago in an Ottawa court for impaired driving causing the death of her boyfriend in 2004 has now escaped incarceration after getting caught driving while drunk in Calgary.

On Tuesday, Dominika Duris, 25, pleaded guilty to having a blood-alcohol level of at least 1.5 times the .08 legal blood alcohol limit after she was caught in a Checkstop at 14th St. and 64th Ave. N.W. on June 7, 2009.

Provincial court Judge Anne Brown accepted a sentencing recommendation by Crown prosecutor Brian Hadford and defence lawyer Lily Rabinovitch for $2,300 in fines.

Brown gave Duris, who currently lives near Brockville, Ont., and was not present in court on Tuesday, a one-year driving prohibition.

However, she made it concurrent to the five-year ban she received on June 15 in the Ontario court, when she was handed a conditional jail sentence of two years less a day to be served in the community – with 90 days of it under house arrest — for impaired driving causing the death of Cory Lockyer, 20.

Hadford said outside the Calgary court following the hearing that he could not treat Duris as a repeat offender, thus subjecting her to at least 30 days in jail.

“At the time of this driving offence she was not convicted of the prior offence,” Hadford explained, “so we can’t rely on it as a previous conviction.”

Wayne Lockyer, the victim’s father, told the Ottawa Citizen in June after sentencing that the penalty for killing his only son was “just like a slap in the face.”

“I’m flabbergasted,” added Donna, the victim’s mother, outside the Ottawa court, adding the family only learned about the Calgary charges just before the sentencing hearing.

She said until then she had been prepared to accept Duris’s conditional sentence and believed the woman, who gave a tearful statement at her sentencing hearing, was remorseful.

“With her victim impact statement, she led me to believe that she was remorseful about it,” the mother told the Citizen. “Hearing this new charge against her blows it all out the window.”

Neither parent could immediately be reached for comment on Monday.

Duris had originally been acquitted of the charge for a single-vehicle collision that killed Lockyer, after the judge threw out breath readings taken by police after concluding they violated her rights.

But the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned the ruling and ordered the new trial on a Crown appeal.

In the second trial, Ontario Court Justice Robert Fournier concluded Duris’s impairment prevented her from reacting appropriately when she found herself in the wrong lane on a rural road on Oct. 31, 2004.

She had been drinking with Lockyer at Montana’s restaurant, where they both worked.

Fournier placed Duris under probation for one year from the conclusion of the conditional sentence. She also must perform 200 hours of community service and abstain from alcohol and drugs.

The judge, as well, ordered the offender to speak at three different high schools about the dangers of drunk driving.

Rabinovitch said her client, who was 19 at the time of the fatal crash, has taken tremendous steps to overcome any alcohol difficulties by taking the Ontario Remedial Plan for impaired drivers and participating in Alcoholics

Anonymous meetings.

[email protected]
© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald

Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Drunk+driver+caused+boyfriend+death+fined+second+offence/5263111/story.html#ixzz1VJMq2Mm3

-relk-
08-17-2011, 12:29 PM
Rabinovitch said her client, who was 19 at the time of the fatal crash, has taken tremendous steps to overcome any alcohol difficulties by taking the Ontario Remedial Plan for impaired drivers and participating in Alcoholics Anonymous meetings.

Apparently they are not working... :facepalm:

For someone who has already been caught drinking and driving (let alone how many times she has not been caught), a one year suspension is ridiculously low. If someone shows that they can't learn from their mistakes, they should not be allowed to continue making them (if your mistakes are punishable by law, and serious enough). IMO she should have her license taken away for closer to 5 years. She probably won't be able to drive due to the cost of insurance though (I would like to see a quote for a 20-something year old with 2 DUIs).

cycosis
08-17-2011, 12:39 PM
Shes 25

dexlargo
08-17-2011, 01:27 PM
Originally posted by -relk-
a one year suspension is ridiculously low. It's not even a one year suspension because the suspension in this case runs at the same time as her 5 year suspension for the fatal impaired that was imposed in June of this year.

NuclearPizzaMan
08-17-2011, 04:31 PM
second offense!


Execute her and leave her corpse hanging from a light post on 17th ave.

calgary403
08-17-2011, 06:25 PM
For first time offenders who have not caused an accident or hurt somebody I think the sentence is acceptable (1 year loss of licence and 1200+ in fines.)

IMHO second offense or if anyone is hurt or you cause any accidents it should be mandatory lifetime driving ban. If someone is killed it should be charged as manslaughter.

Repeat offenders blew their chance and the don't deserve to be on the road.

mucat
08-17-2011, 06:26 PM
She killed someone last time, she killed no one this time......looks like an improvement to me.

rage2
08-17-2011, 06:52 PM
Damn she got fat.

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2011/06/15/Dominika_Duris248.jpg

http://www.calgaryherald.com/5263113.bin

dirtsniffer
08-17-2011, 06:52 PM
haha nvm

10 year driving ban minimun

Xtrema
08-17-2011, 07:13 PM
Originally posted by rage2
Damn she got fat.

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2011/06/15/Dominika_Duris248.jpg

http://www.calgaryherald.com/5263113.bin

Should have held alcohol better? :rofl:

Shlade
08-17-2011, 07:22 PM
Being fat is punishable by death.

Maybelater
08-18-2011, 05:51 AM
Originally posted by Shlade
Being fat is punishable by death.

:rofl:

HyperZell
08-18-2011, 09:28 AM
Originally posted by Shlade
Being fat is punishable by death.

I laughed.


And then I agreed.

J-hop
08-18-2011, 01:18 PM
The problem isn't this individual, there are many more where she came from. The problem is people that have fought to reduce the power police need to do their job (hence te conviction of the first crime being delayed due to the breathalyzer test being thrown out so she couldn't be convicted as a repeat)

A great example are the "fight your speeding or careless driving ticket" threads on here. If some people on here had their way it would be against your rights to give someone a driving ticket and people would get to do whatever they want like drive 200km/hr down deerfoot, drink and drive, text and drive.

Just remember the next time you bitch about cops having too much power and violating your precious rights, that there is an ugly flipside to the coin. You are part of a group that has allowed and enabled disgusting individuals like this to commit crimes and get nothing but a light slap on the wrist.

Feruk
08-18-2011, 03:51 PM
Originally posted by J-hop
The problem isn't this individual, there are many more where she came from. The problem is people that have fought to reduce the power police need to do their job (hence te conviction of the first crime being delayed due to the breathalyzer test being thrown out so she couldn't be convicted as a repeat)

A great example are the "fight your speeding or careless driving ticket" threads on here. If some people on here had their way it would be against your rights to give someone a driving ticket and people would get to do whatever they want like drive 200km/hr down deerfoot, drink and drive, text and drive.

Just remember the next time you bitch about cops having too much power and violating your precious rights, that there is an ugly flipside to the coin. You are part of a group that has allowed and enabled disgusting individuals like this to commit crimes and get nothing but a light slap on the wrist.
Your logic of "give cops more power and make laws for the common good" is just as scewed the other way. By your logic, we should just make all speed limits 30km/h, that way everyone's way safer! There has to be a happy medium.

Having said that, this thread has NOTHING to do with power of police. They made the bust, but it is the Canadian legal system that prevented the relevance of the first incident to impact this one. I may not agree with it, but it was the correct legal call. Imagine they allow the case where she allegedly killed someone to impact this, followed by her being acquitted on that case. Makes no sense.

J-hop
08-18-2011, 05:42 PM
agreed 100% there needs to be a happy medium but promoting adherence to the current laws is the best place to start. It has to be agreed that whatever happy medium we decide on(read 'law') must be followed and none of this breaking the law then fighting tooth and nail to avoid the consequences. That is what enables scum like this.

This absolutely does have to do with the power of the police. Why have something like a breathalyzer test if police aren't given the power to enforce it without "violating" someone's rights. Now I realize it was eventually overruled (too late) but the power of the police should never be questioned in that manner.

No I don't think people should drive at 30 everywhere but I sure think if you get caught doing 85 in a 70 zone you should damn well have to pay the price regardless of if the officer wrote the wrong date/time on your ticket. Same thing applies if you are pulled over for suspected impairment you should have to submit to a breathalyzer and pay the consequences regardless of what rights you think were violated in the process.