PDA

View Full Version : $43 million painting - "Water Lilies"



ZenOps
11-09-2012, 05:37 PM
http://www.calgaryherald.com/entertainment/Work+from+Monets+Water+Lilies+series+sells+more+than+million+benefit/7524666/story.html

Must be better than "The Scream".

masoncgy
11-09-2012, 06:07 PM
What's that saying?

I don't know much about art, but I know what I like... or something like that.

Yeah, this, I don't like. Ug-ly.

Kloubek
11-09-2012, 06:22 PM
There aren't a lot of painting periods from over a century ago that people would consider beautiful today... especially those of impressionist style. It's a style which gets entirely lost on today's generations.

Art like this truly requires someone who appreciates who the painter was.

OU812
11-09-2012, 07:08 PM
nickle content of the paint used?

ExtraSlow
11-09-2012, 07:23 PM
I like a lot of impressionist works, but the water lillies never worked for me. Like Thomas Crowne, I prefer the haystacks

ZenOps
11-10-2012, 07:09 AM
Originally posted by OU812
nickle content of the paint used?

Could be pretty high, they might have even used unicorn tears

But I do know that the price of a single painting is getting much closer to the dollar value of every pure Canadian nickel ever made.

1922 to 1981, Canada made 1.9 billion 99.9% nickels ($95 million)

1935 to 1967 Canada also made about 60 million 80% silver dollars.

Cos
11-10-2012, 09:10 AM
.

Sugarphreak
11-10-2012, 11:06 AM
Originally posted by Cos
I like art. I have a Son of Man by Magritte and I really want a starry night by van Gogh but I cant understand this stuff being worth hundreds of millions. Never made sense to me.

Things are only worth what people are willing to pay for them, the fact that people will pay that much for paintings like this, when the average person shakes their head, tells me they live extravagant and useless lives... almost makes you feel sorry for them.