PDA

View Full Version : C7z: 650 650



Gripenfelter
06-07-2014, 09:55 PM
2015 Corvette Z06 Rated at 650 Horsepower
Supercharged LT4 V-8 engine is the most powerful ever from Chevrolet

DETROIT – The all-new 2015 Corvette Z06 is the most powerful production car ever from General Motors and one of a few production cars available in the United States that delivers more than 600 horsepower.

The Z06's LT4 supercharged 6.2L V-8 engine is SAE-certified at 650 horsepower (485 kW) at 6,400 rpm and 650 lb-ft of torque (881 Nm) at 3,600 rpm.

"The LT4 Small Block sets a new benchmark for power and torque at GM," said Steve Kiefer, vice president, GM Powertrain Engineering. "The engine also puts the new Corvette Z06 on par with the most powerful supercars offered in America, while delivering performance with impeccable manners that make it suitable for daily driving."

Compared with other supercar engines, the LT4 is a veritable fountain of low-end torque, producing 457 lb-ft (619 Nm) just off idle and 625 lb-ft (847 Nm) by only 2,800 rpm. The V-12-powered Ferrari F12 Berlinetta, for example, produces about 28 percent less torque than the Z06, despite offering about 12 percent more horsepower – and its peak torque isn't achieved until 6,000 rpm. The LT4 maintains 90 percent of its peak torque, or 592 lb-ft (802 Nm), from 2,500 to 5,400 rpm.

The new LT4 engine eclipses the Porsche 911 Turbo S engine's peak power levels by 90 horsepower (67 kW) and 134 lb-ft of torque (182 Nm).

"Torque is the pulling power of an engine and the LT4's abundance of it at every rpm in the engine's speed range helps the 2015 Corvette Z06 accelerate quicker and respond nearly instantaneously," said Jordan Lee, chief engineer for Small Block engines. "It's the very definition of power on demand."

The new Z06 engine produces 40 percent more peak torque (180 lb-ft / 244 Nm) than the previous-generation's 7.0L LS7 engine – and 7.5 percent more than the supercharged 2013 Corvette ZR1's 604 lb-ft (819 Nm). At 3,200 rpm, the new LT4 surpasses the LS7 by 208 lb-ft of torque (252 Nm). On the horsepower side of the graph, the LT4's 650-hp rating is 29 percent greater than the LS7's 505 horsepower (376 kW), and 12 horses more than the ZR1's LS9 engine.

"The new LT4 engine builds on the design strengths of our previous supercharged engine and leverages the technologies introduced on the Corvette Stingray – direct injection, cylinder deactivation and continuously variable valve timing – to take Corvette performance to an all-new plateau," said Lee. "Our new, very compact supercharger also helps the engine make power more quickly, and perhaps more importantly, it helps produce more torque earlier in the rpm band."

"It's also worth mentioning that the LT4's supercar performance numbers are achieved with an engine that is nearly the same size as the very compact LT1 engine introduced in the 2014 Corvette Stingray," Lee said. "The power density of the LT4 makes it one of the smallest and lightest 650-hp engines in the industry."

LT4 details
The new LT4 engine is based on the same Gen 5 small block foundation as the Corvette Stingray's LT1 6.2L naturally aspirated engine, incorporating several unique features designed to support its higher output and the greater cylinder pressures created by forced induction, including:
• Rotocast A356T6 aluminum cylinder heads that are stronger and handle heat better than conventional aluminum heads
• Lightweight titanium intake valves
• Machined, forged powder metal steel connecting rods for reduced reciprocating mass
• High 10.0:1 compression ratio – for a forced-induction engine – enhances performance and efficiency and is enabled by direct injection
• Forged aluminum pistons with unique, stronger structure to ensure strength under high cylinder pressures
• Stainless steel exhaust manifolds and an aluminum balancer that are lighter than their LT1 counterparts
• Standard dry-sump oiling system with a dual-pressure-control oil pump.

A new 1.7L supercharger spins at up to 20,000 rpm – 5,000 rpm more than the supercharger on the Corvette ZR1's engine. The rotors are smaller in diameter, which contributes to their higher-rpm capability – and enables them to produce power-enhancing boost earlier in the rpm band. That boost is achieved more efficiently via a more direct discharge port that creates less turbulence, reducing heat and speeding airflow into the engine.

"The Small Block's cam-in-block design heritage has always enabled very high performance and responsiveness in a small, compact package – an attribute amplified by the performance of our new supercharger's design," said Lee.

The LT4 is assembled at the new Performance Build Center at GM's Bowling Green Assembly Plant and at GM's Tonawanda engine plant in New York. It is matched with a standard seven-speed manual transmission or an all-new, paddle-shift eight-speed automatic transmission built in Toledo, Ohio.

Designed to deliver shift responses on par with the world's best dual-clutch transmissions, it is the first automatic offered in a Z06. It also makes the Z06 one of the few cars this powerful to offer the choice of a conventional manual transmission or an eight-speed automatic.

The 2015 Corvette Z06 goes on sale in early 2015.

http://www.autoblog.com/2014/06/06/2015-chevrolet-corvette-z06-650-hp-official/

davidI
06-07-2014, 10:02 PM
:drool: :burnout:

Sugarphreak
06-07-2014, 11:57 PM
...

soloracer
06-08-2014, 09:18 AM
The first Corvette that I actually would like to own. Can't wait to see some driving reviews.

A790
06-08-2014, 11:33 AM
Any word on pricing?

georgemagana
06-08-2014, 03:02 PM
Probably will start at 90-95k here in Canada. Forum rummor say around 85k base in the states and around or just over 100k for the Z07 package.

brucebanner
06-08-2014, 03:05 PM
Yes please. :drool:

Disoblige
06-08-2014, 05:18 PM
Man, that is so sweet.
Although I'd be pretty happy with just a decently optioned C7 too haha.

xnvy
06-08-2014, 06:16 PM
Goddamn. That's the kind of car to try and rip your face off.

MGCM
06-08-2014, 10:11 PM
I WANT POWER NOW DAMNIT! C7Z>turbo lag

94boosted
06-09-2014, 09:18 AM
This thing will be seriously quick, I can't think of many supercars (not hypercars) that will be faster on a track.


Originally posted by georgemagana
Probably will start at 90-95k here in Canada. Forum rummor say around 85k base in the states and around or just over 100k for the Z07 package.

That seems way too low, this thing will eclipse the ZR1 performance wise which started at over 100K 5 years ago here in Canada. If they do somehow manage to price this car at 85K (in the US) that would be the performance bargain of a lifetime.

ercchry
06-09-2014, 10:19 AM
Originally posted by 94boosted
This thing will be seriously quick, I can't think of many supercars (not hypercars) that will be faster on a track.



That seems way too low, this thing will eclipse the ZR1 performance wise which started at over 100K 5 years ago here in Canada. If they do somehow manage to price this car at 85K (in the US) that would be the performance bargain of a lifetime.

"if you could afford the c6 z06 you can afford the c7 z06" plus.... the $2k difference in the base c7 in USD vs CAD

94boosted
06-09-2014, 10:41 AM
Originally posted by ercchry


"if you could afford the c6 z06 you can afford the c7 z06" plus.... the $2k difference in the base c7 in USD vs CAD

Wow, no kidding ehy. Edmunds (http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/features/2015-chevrolet-corvette-z06-first-look.html) reports:

"Final pricing isn't announced yet, but GM insiders insist that its cost will be comparable to the outgoing Z06, which started at $76,595.

"If you could afford the previous Z06, you can afford this one,""

Jesus that's ridiculous :eek:

Disoblige
06-09-2014, 10:47 AM
Yeah but think about the demand.. How long is it going to take before you can even think of getting a C7, let alone Z06 version for MSRP?

Calgary is trying to charge $67,500 for a base C7, and over $80k with Z51, yet MRSP is supposed to be $53k and $57k respectively (minus destination fee, etc.)

MGCM
06-09-2014, 11:19 AM
MSRP ? wtf is that? they have ignored MSRP for ages and ages and ages, why do they even fucking bother posting it? I wish so badly Canada had a real car company of its own so we could fuck the USA back on MSRP'S.:whipped: stupid fucking americans

94boosted
06-09-2014, 11:20 AM
^True, but that could be said for most new performance cars. If you're willing to wait a year or so you'll be able to have a supercar slayer for 5 figures.

MGCM
06-09-2014, 11:22 AM
Originally posted by 94boosted
^True, but that could be said for most new performance cars. If you're willing to wait a year or so you'll be able to have a supercar slayer for 5 figures.

or import a used one from Florida next year;)

94boosted
06-11-2014, 03:34 PM
First example spotted on public roads

http://www.corvetteforum.com/articles/new-z06-spotted-public-road/

Disoblige
06-11-2014, 04:07 PM
Looks amazing in black wow.

Mibz
06-11-2014, 04:32 PM
Every C7 I see on the road looks better and better.

ercchry
06-11-2014, 05:18 PM
Originally posted by Mibz
Every C7 I see on the road looks better and better.

I really just dont like the black accents around the taillights... looks like a girl with mascara that has ran down her face... getting the car in black solves that i guess... but im sick of black cars... too much work to keep clean.

94boosted
08-22-2014, 10:05 AM
Pricing (US) for the Z06 announced: (http://m.motortrend.com/wot/1408_2015_chevrolet_corvette_z06_pricing_announced.html??sm_id=social_20140822_30277406)

$78,995 Coupe
$83,995 Convertible

But most importantly the Z07 Package is only $7995

So for the fastest car (historically the 1LZ trims are the lightest) the coupe w/ Z07 Pkg will be $86,990 for something that should decimate just about everything on a race track, that's a pretty good deal :eek: Hopefully we don't get bent over too badly on Canadian pricing.

corsvette
08-22-2014, 10:11 AM
A bargain. Can't wait to see this car destroy others costing 2x as much.

benyl
08-22-2014, 10:36 AM
Wasn't the Canadian price for the C6 Z06 close to $100K? Bet it will be in the high $80Ks in Canada.

schocker
08-22-2014, 10:52 AM
Great deal, if you are tracking the Z07 package is also a good deal.

^^^I think it was like mid 90's. High 80s sounds right with the stingray pricing the way it is. I wonder if they would up it since the dollar tanked since it was released.

94boosted
08-22-2014, 11:22 AM
Originally posted by benyl
Wasn't the Canadian price for the C6 Z06 close to $100K? Bet it will be in the high $80Ks in Canada.

I think if you loaded up a C6 Z06 you could get over 100K but base was either low 90's or high 80's can't remember anymore.

Darkane
08-22-2014, 12:09 PM
Wow. Hmmm

georgemagana
08-22-2014, 12:30 PM
Ummm seems like the Nismo would have some competition but for half the price haha

Disoblige
08-22-2014, 01:13 PM
Originally posted by georgemagana
Ummm seems like the Nismo would have some competition but for half the price haha
What? lol..

Darkane
08-22-2014, 01:18 PM
Originally posted by Disoblige

What? lol..

Nismo Gtr. 160k usd. 600hp.

Z06 half price.

Disoblige
08-22-2014, 01:24 PM
Oh damn, didn't realize the Nismo was that much of a premium over a normal GTR. My bads!

Twin_Cam_Turbo
08-22-2014, 01:27 PM
Another one for my "when I win the lottery" fund.

georgemagana
08-22-2014, 02:28 PM
Originally posted by Disoblige
Oh damn, didn't realize the Nismo was that much of a premium over a normal GTR. My bads!

Haha sorry my bad I should off said Nismo GTR.

Im a nissan fanboy now so im hoping it doesnt get drstroyed by it haha but man the Z06/Z07 will be sick. It's front Michelin Cup tires are the same size as the stupid dunlops the gtr has in the rear haha

Kloubek
08-22-2014, 02:51 PM
...all from a pushrod engine. Incredible, considering the relatively low-tech design compared to it's competitors.

Mitsu3000gt
08-22-2014, 02:55 PM
Why are they bragging that their 6.2L supercharged motor makes more power than a 3.8L turbo or more torque than a naturally aspirated 6.3L? Seems odd, and extremely obvious.

Looks to be a performance bargain though, even at ~$100K. Wouldn't be my first pick but I can't argue the performance value. Hopefully they are built better than the last ones.

slinkie
08-22-2014, 03:38 PM
Originally posted by Mitsu3000gt
Why are they bragging that their 6.2L supercharged motor makes more power than a 3.8L turbo or more torque than a naturally aspirated 6.3L?

cave-tech valvetrain :angel:

corsvette
08-22-2014, 06:00 PM
Originally posted by Kloubek
...all from a pushrod engine. Incredible, considering the relatively low-tech design compared to it's competitors.

Yeah, GM's been getting flack for the pushrod cam-in-block since the 1980's. They even tried a 4 cam 32 Valve in the first ZR1, but when the LT1 came out in 1992 the performance was so close it made the ZR1 look silly (esp at $25k premium)

What GM has done with these small blocks is amazing. The power and economy give up nothing to the competition, plus you get a reliable, and easy/cheap to maintain engine.

Redlined_8000
08-22-2014, 08:44 PM
I am loving how Chev/Ford/Dodge are going here.... 79k for a 650hp z06... 60k for 707hp hellcat... Good times to be a car guy thats for sure!


This z06 is a performance bargain and looks so bad ass.... Maybe trade the C63 for this in a few years.

94boosted
08-25-2014, 01:51 PM
Originally posted by Mitsu3000gt
Why are they bragging that their 6.2L supercharged motor makes more power than a 3.8L turbo or more torque than a naturally aspirated 6.3L? Seems odd, and extremely obvious.



Making big power is easy, making big power that's reliable and relatively affordable is not and these small blocks are tough as hell. Many vette owners, myself included track the shit out of their cars and only change the oil for year after reliable year. I'm sure if they wanted to push 800, 900 horsepower out of this engine they could but then reliability would go out the window. Besides there is more to power & toque than peak numbers, the area under the curve is more important and this motor will be potent at just about any rev in any gear.

Sugarphreak
08-25-2014, 02:01 PM
...

Mitsu3000gt
08-25-2014, 02:19 PM
Originally posted by 94boosted


Making big power is easy, making big power that's reliable and relatively affordable is not and these small blocks are tough as hell. Many vette owners, myself included track the shit out of their cars and only change the oil for year after reliable year. I'm sure if they wanted to push 800, 900 horsepower out of this engine they could but then reliability would go out the window. Besides there is more to power & toque than peak numbers, the area under the curve is more important and this motor will be potent at just about any rev in any gear.

I realize that, but in the press release, they are bragging about power numbers, and comparing it specifically to power numbers of other cars - they don't mention a word about reliability. There are lots of cars that can be reliably tracked one day and driven to church the next, with fantastic power curves - some of them even have 5 seats.

It just seems odd to me, they are like "hey everyone, we made a giant 6.2L supercharged V8 that makes more power than a turbo engine nearly half the size and more torque than an engine of the same displacement but without forced induction of any kind". Well yeah...I certainly hope that you can haha.

I'm not saying it's an unimpressive motor itself, it just seems strange to put super obvious and unimpressive comparisons in a press release. Why not compare it to similarly sized forced induction V8's?

I didn't mean to make a big deal out of it, I just found that odd haha. It would be like Porsche coming out and saying their twin turbo 6cyl on the new 911 makes more power than a N/A motor of similar displacement and more power than a 2.0L turbo 4cyl. Ok....good job? Haha.

Anyway, one thing we can all agree on is that huge HP is pretty cheap these days, whatever your poison may be.

Cos
08-25-2014, 02:38 PM
.

dirtsniffer
08-25-2014, 03:21 PM
corvette has a pretty solid reputation for beating ferrari and porsche do they not?

riander5
08-25-2014, 04:04 PM
Originally posted by Mitsu3000gt



Lol classic import guy quote "Oh yea well you have more displacement!!!" (No one is forcing porsche to use a TT flat 6... well.... except for all their loyal 911 customers haha)

GM is comparing to performance competitors from the other brands (obviously the 918 and LaFerrari are in more of a supercar league)

It doesnt matter what ferarri or porsche's top dogs engine is, thats what the z06 would be benchmarked against. Why fault GM for making the engine they did and (benchracing) seemingly doing a better job?

Hater!

Mitsu3000gt
08-25-2014, 04:08 PM
Originally posted by riander5


Lol classic import guy quote "Oh yea well you have more displacement!!!" (No one is forcing porsche to use a TT flat 6... well.... except for all their loyal 911 customers haha)

GM is comparing to performance competitors from the other brands (obviously the 918 and LaFerrari are in more of a supercar league)

It doesnt matter what ferarri or porsche's top dogs engine is, thats what the z06 would be benchmarked against. Why fault GM for making the engine they did and (benchracing) seemingly doing a better job?

Hater!

Lol what?

Nobody is making the displacement argument, and nobody is faulting them for that motor haha. I think you are very confused.


:english:

riander5
08-25-2014, 04:52 PM
Originally posted by Mitsu3000gt

It just seems odd to me, they are like "hey everyone, we made a giant 6.2L supercharged V8 that makes more power than a turbo engine nearly half the size and more torque than an engine of the same displacement but without forced induction of any kind". Well yeah...I certainly hope that you can haha.

I'm not saying it's an unimpressive motor itself, it just seems strange to put super obvious and unimpressive comparisons in a press release. Why not compare it to similarly sized forced induction V8's?

I didn't mean to make a big deal out of it, I just found that odd haha. It would be like Porsche coming out and saying their twin turbo 6cyl on the new 911 makes more power than a N/A motor of similar displacement and more power than a 2.0L turbo 4cyl. Ok....good job? Haha.


This is what you said.... Saying why would GM compare their engine to smaller / non FI engines..... AKA import guy "pick on engines your own size" comments haha

Why would chevy compare a SCv8 to a TTflat 6 or a NAv12??

Because they are direct competitors...

I think you are confused... about what you wrote.. :nut:

Hallowed_point
08-25-2014, 05:04 PM
May the mighty 2V push rod engine never stop being produced :love:

Mitsu3000gt
08-26-2014, 09:00 AM
Originally posted by riander5


This is what you said.... Saying why would GM compare their engine to smaller / non FI engines..... AKA import guy "pick on engines your own size" comments haha

Why would chevy compare a SCv8 to a TTflat 6 or a NAv12??

Because they are direct competitors...

I think you are confused... about what you wrote.. :nut:

I started to try explain it to you, but it's just not worth it haha. This is not even remotely an import vs domestic argument, but rather a discussion regarding the curious wording of a couple lines in the press release. They ARE comparing it to an engine of almost exactly the same size, but one lacking forced induction entirely. Also, in what world are a good number of Ferrari F12 customers cross shopping with Corvettes haha? I wouldn't exactly call those "direct" competitors.

Nobody is hating on the Z06 here, it's a performance bargain with a great engine. You're looking for something that isn't there.

LSChevelle
08-26-2014, 12:02 PM
Originally posted by Mitsu3000gt
It just seems odd to me, they are like "hey everyone, we made a giant 6.2L supercharged V8 that makes more power than a turbo engine nearly half the size and more torque than an engine of the same displacement but without forced induction of any kind". Well yeah...I certainly hope that you can haha.

Maybe it was just the way you worded it but I thought the exact same thing as riander. Why does the "giant 6.2L" matter in this situation? They're both sports cars, which are meant to go fast, look good and handle well. Different manufacturers get their power numbers different ways.

The only argument I can think of against displacement is fuel economy, and it is a weak one at that. I have a 6.0L turbo in my car and it gets better fuel economy than my old 2.0L turbo, has twice the power and torque all over.

Anyways, this car looks sick. I can't wait to start playing with the LT engines.