Was the Titanic a real ship?

[ZenOps]

Seems to be some sort of Iraqi disinformation minister thing happening with the consciousness of todays youth. A disconnect with anything to do with the ocean (like how Atlantis is completely fictional) and how North Korea has a navy roughly the raw numbers of the US:

Do you believe that the Titanic was a real ship launched in 1912, and that it sank to the bottom of the ocean on collision with an iceberg?

[G-ZUS]

Originally posted by ZenOps
Seems to be some sort of Iraqi disinformation minister thing happening with the consciousness of todays youth. A disconnect with anything to do with the ocean (like how Atlantis is completely fictional) and how North Korea has a navy roughly the raw numbers of the US:

Do you believe that the Titanic was a real ship launched in 1912, and that it sank to the bottom of the ocean on collision with an iceberg?

No, it was a hoax

[BigMass]

the titanic was a false flag for launching the war on icebergs

[lilmira]

Will my heart go on if I believe it?

[NRGie]

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/45/23/08/4523085d92a853f2d432ed2a4d921776.jpg

[G-ZUS]

Illuminati

[Sugarphreak]

....

[xnvy]

No. The Titanic didn't exist. No ship the engineers would call unsinkable could ever sink.

[DannyO]

The Titanic didn't sink, it just flew back to its home planet.

[Sentry]

ICE CAN'T CUT STEEL PLATES

WAKE UP PEOPLE

[cancer man]

Originally posted by Sentry
ICE CAN'T CUT STEEL PLATES

WAKE UP PEOPLE

Ur rite but it can bite thru rivets ,nice to know that Arash has moved in
with you.

[schurchill39]

Wasn't Titanic some Roman god that the American's stole and claimed as their own?

[Graham_A_M]

It did have a 4th stack, but it was only placed there for the grandeur and impressive factor as they wanted it to show off the fact that it was the largest ship ever built upon its completion. It wasn't needed as it could have done just fine with the three stacks. However in the design stage they insisted that it should have 4. I'm not entirely sure if they rerouted some of the exhausts from the boilers to be redirected to make use of the 4th or not, but that's the jest of it.

And yes like what was said, the iceberg pushed very hard on the steel plating which is what tore the rivets.

[ndhal417]

The Titanic was sunk by James Cameron so he could profit from the film rights.

[rage2]

Originally posted by ndhal417
The Titanic was sunk by James Cameron so he could profit from the film rights.
Not directly. He sent a T-800 back in time to do the job.

[Maxt]

Originally posted by Graham_A_M
It did have a 4th stack, but it was only placed there for the grandeur and impressive factor as they wanted it to show off the fact that it was the largest ship ever built upon its completion. It wasn't needed as it could have done just fine with the three stacks. However in the design stage they insisted that it should have 4. I'm not entirely sure if they rerouted some of the exhausts from the boilers to be redirected to make use of the 4th or not, but that's the jest of it.

And yes like what was said, the iceberg pushed very hard on the steel plating which is what tore the rivets.
So the ships owners were Ricers, before Ricers were Ricers..

[rage2]

Originally posted by Graham_A_M
I'm not entirely sure if they rerouted some of the exhausts from the boilers to be redirected to make use of the 4th or not, but that's the jest of it.
They did not. The 4th stack didn't have any smoke.

[Fly Fishin']

Last I read the fourth stack was used for storage of deck chairs, tables and other random crap. Probably not the full thing lol

[Tik-Tok]

4th stack was full of nazi's. It was a Trojan Horse maneuver. Americans caught wind and torpedoed it.

[schurchill39]

Originally posted by Tik-Tok
4th stack was full of nazi's. It was a Trojan Horse maneuver. Americans caught wind and torpedoed it.

This explains a lot.

[Darell_n]

Titanic was a movie, there was no ship or iceberg. Too many people took the blue pill instead or the red one.

[Danny Meehan]

NASA devised a strategy to return Titanic to Earth safely after the craft undergoes massive internal damage, putting the lives of the three astronauts on board in jeopardy.

It was a massive coverup, here it is on the Moon as it was photographed in 1974, February 30th

https://verbalfiend.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/31.jpg

[A790]

:rofl:

[Idiot Stick]

This threads got me all :rofl: 'ing

[OU812]

The ocean actually doesnt exsist. it is a hologram projected to hide the vast quantities of Nickle on earth to artificaly drive the price up.

The reactors used to power the hologram are housed in N. Korea and Russia.

True story.

[englishbob]

I knew 2 survivors who thought it was real but they were old and probably forgetful.

[Redlyne_mr2]

Somewhere there is a grade schooler searching "titanic history" online, coming across this thread and using the info above as fact...A+

[Darell_n]

Originally posted by Redlyne_mr2
Somewhere there is a grade schooler searching "titanic history" online, coming across this thread and using the info above as fact...A+

I see nothing but facts here. It's on the internet and therefore must be written by objective professors.

[sneek]

Originally posted by ndhal417
The Titanic was sunk by James Cameron so he could profit from the film rights.

He also made insane money by selling the scraps of the boat. The exterior of the vessel was constructed purely of nickel.

[OTown]

Originally posted by englishbob
I knew 2 survivors who thought it was real but they were old and probably forgetful.

Blame it on Alzheimers.

[Tik-Tok]

Originally posted by Redlyne_mr2
Somewhere there is a grade schooler searching "titanic history" online, coming across this thread and using the info above as fact...A+

And because of Google's algorithms, it's probably a Beyonders kid :rofl:

[kertejud2]

Originally posted by englishbob
I knew 2 survivors who thought it was real but they were old and probably forgetful.

I bet those same two people were also survivors of the Lusitania sinking. Professional actors hired by the government to play victims.

Just like all those Sandy Hook parents.

[Tik-Tok]

Originally posted by kertejud2


I bet those same two people were also survivors of the Lusitania sinking. Professional actors hired by the government to play victims.

Just like all those Sandy Hook parents.

:werd:

In this video taken by a survivor, you can see one of the "victims" succumbing to the cold ocean and drowning... yet 13 years later, he is seen again throwing parties in his mansion, under a different name and being a corporate shill...

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view1/3630052/jack-dawson-sinking-o.gif

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Arts/Arts_/Pictures/2013/4/29/1367246270416/2012-THE-GREAT-GATSBY-011.jpg

[killramos]

I love how Zenops hasn't even come ball to his own thread...

[BerserkerCatSplat]

The Titanic was actually legitimately unsinkable - until your mom boarded.

[OU812]

They are only just starting to build it now as they needed technology to catch up with thought.

http://bluestarline.com.au/

[ZenOps]

Lets see.. Titanic was pre World War I, meaning that armor plating especially on passenger vessels probably would not have been used.

So probably not much nickel in the hull, although I could be wrong. The fourth stack could have been filled with gold however, which made it topheavy and was the reason it sunk.

So by that rationale: There was more gold on the Titanic than nickel :clap:

[NoPulp]

The titanic never sank because ice doesn't exist and it's impossible to travel on water. Therefore ZenOps can count to potato.

[MalibuStacy]

Originally posted by NoPulp
The titanic never sank because ice doesn't exist and it's impossible to travel on water. Therefore ZenOps can count to potato. :cry:

[ZenOps]

I'm not entirely making that up:

http://www.cbc.ca/newsblogs/technology/quirks-quarks-blog/2012/04/poor-choice-of-materials-made-titanic-more-vulnerable.html

Cheap Steel rivets are the conclusion of the "experts", cheap meaning of course - low nickel (and low chromium) content.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krupp_armour

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krupp_cemented_armour

Krupp naval armor was developed in 1893, but it seems - did not make it into the rivets of the Titanic. The hull of the ship was also very thin (built for speed) as noone had even considered the possibility of needing a thick hull to protect against mines and torpedos (pre WWI) Adding a 3.9% nickel mix to the hull of a 46,328 ton ship - would be expensive even today.

Could an iceberg have broken her open? I still have my doubts. But a torpedo or being rammed by Blackbeards ship? Like carving a turkey.

[Feruk]

Come on guys, basic science taught us that liquids SINK in water. So how can you have an iceberg float?? Check mate! The "horrible iceberg" myth is just created by Newfie fishermen not wanting competition in their fisheries. Then they needed a monster to solidify it. Ever notice how "Titanic" inspires the same awe as I dunno... Godzilla. :nut:

[Strider]

Originally posted by ZenOps
Cheap Steel rivets are the conclusion of the "experts", cheap meaning of course - low nickel (and low chromium) content.

Could an iceberg have broken her open?

I wasn't an iceberg that broke the rivets, it was NOS. So many lives lost because the Captain ignored the Danger to Manifold warning :(

[lasimmon]

I blame polar bears.

[G-ZUS]

I call insurance fraud :poosie:

[Graham_A_M]

Uh Zenops, metallurgy wasn't exactly in its prime when the ship was built. Back then one of the strongest metals they had were what's called HSS, or high speed steel. It's basically composed of steel with a high carbon content of up to .4%. While it still would be quite stronger then typical mild steel today, its nothing in comparison to modern day metals or tempering or hardening techniques now known today. I can assure you there wouldn't be much if any nickel used in the alloys... as it does next to nothing. Other potential alloys would have been vanadium, magnesium, molydebium or chromium infused steel, but a century ago, they didn't know what they were doing too much.

It's easy to say "well they should have done this or that or the other thing". Yeah? Hind sight is 20/20. Technology has evolved immensity over the last 100 years. Yeah they should have done things differently, absolutely. But a century ago they didn't know any better. Besides think about how many thousands and thousands of rivets were needed to build the entire hull and structure of it, as i dont think welding was even around back then.

[ZenOps]

The rivets might have been made out of wrought iron, which is about as basic as it gets.

Krupp armor, was a german invention - and arguably was not shared with the rest of europe, including the makers of the Titanic.

[LilDrunkenSmurf]

The titanic was a time machine, and so dangerous we had to send "ice" back in time to sink it. Haven't you noticed they only started building it recently?

"Titanic II" my ass.

http://bluestarline.com.au/

[Seth1968]

Captain Smith is Obama's great Grandfather.

[Quiet10]

I heard chocolate ice was busy so they sent back vanilla ice to do the job :dunno:

[LilDrunkenSmurf]

Originally posted by Quiet10
I heard chocolate ice was busy so they sent back vanilla ice to do the job :dunno:

They obviously missed, and he ended up in the 80's.

[Seth1968]

The project was so massive that there are reports of workers being sealed under the deck plates.

It was like, "Meh, I'm done for the day, and I'm starving". " I have a potato in my shanty that's just waiting to be relished".

[sputnik]

It was a real ship. However the people on board didn't die.

They just joined the first iteration of the Dharma Initiative.

https://4815162342execute.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/questionmark436.jpg

[ZenOps]

4 8 15 16 23 42

I just saved teh universe!

[civic_stylez]

Somali Pirates took this bitch over and turned it into a floating call centre. All calls from "the captain', Marriott and westjet come from it.

[ICEBERG]

Originally posted by ZenOps
4 8 15 16 23 42

I just saved teh universe!

Hey, are these the 6/49 numbers for Wednesday?

[vengie]

Originally posted by ICEBERG


Hey, are these the 6/49 numbers for Wednesday?

Quite ironic you would post in this thread

[btimbit]

Originally posted by vengie


Quite ironic you would post in this thread

http://new1.fjcdn.com/comments/He+s+retiring+next+year+so+bill+murray+can+t+be+on+_2b795cb7d67ca0e5b49f6009354f8aee.jpg

[ICEBERG]

Originally posted by vengie


Quite ironic you would post in this thread

:D :D

[Milk2%]

Originally posted by ZenOps
Seems to be some sort of Iraqi disinformation minister thing happening with the consciousness of todays youth. A disconnect with anything to do with the ocean (like how Atlantis is completely fictional) and how North Korea has a navy roughly the raw numbers of the US:

Do you believe that the Titanic was a real ship launched in 1912, and that it sank to the bottom of the ocean on collision with an iceberg?

Very sad day for beyond. Another bunch of hopeless nerds

[lasimmon]

Originally posted by Milk2%


Very sad day for beyond. Another bunch of hopeless nerds

Damn. It must suck living in your world.

[Dave P]

Originally posted by G-ZUS
I call insurance fraud :poosie:

Only because I am a commercial insurance geek of sorts.

http://www.lloyds.com/lloyds/about-us/history/catastrophes-and-claims/titanic


https://www.lloyds.com/~/media/images/news%20and%20insight/news%20and%20features/2012/titanic%20top%20ten.pdf


Lots of room for fraud, seeing as they were still reinsuring the Titanic after she sunk. DUN DUN DUNnnnnnnnnnnnnn