2016 Infiniti Q50S TT 400HP

[89coupe]

I like, cheaper then the Germans, more reliable, and decent HP.

Might be my next car.

http://jalopnik.com/the-2016-infiniti-q50-proves-two-turbos-and-400-hp-make-1761337920

[Buster]

They got rid of the VQ. Good.

That thing reminded me of a truck engine, moo-ing.

That's because it was a truck engine, moo-ing.

[89coupe]

I love my G35S.

I've owned it from new since 2007 and haven't had one issue with it. Flawless.

Can't say the same for my friends with BMW & Mercedes.

[riander5]

Will it be cheaper? 50k puts it right in the ballpark for the sub msport, baby amg and S models

[89coupe]

Originally posted by riander5
Will it be cheaper? 50k puts it right in the ballpark for the sub msport, baby amg and S models

$55k fully loaded.

Show me an AWD fully loaded 4 door sedan with 400+hp for that price?

[schocker]

The red sport is supposed to start at about $50k USD so it will be around the same pricing as an S4/C450/340i.

I liked my infiniti, but I wouldn't get this over one of the germans.

[Disoblige]

Originally posted by 89coupe


$55k fully loaded.

Show me an AWD fully loaded 4 door sedan with 400+hp for that price?
This car will never be 55k fully loaded. Guaranteed.

It's already 50K for the 3.5 L NA V6 w/ AWD.

[riander5]

Originally posted by 89coupe


$55k fully loaded.

Show me an AWD fully loaded 4 door sedan with 400+hp for that price?

Wait what kind of fully loaded are we talking here...

[89coupe]

There are 4 coming to the North Dealership at the end of the month. I made an appointment to test drive one.

It will be interesting to see how it performs and the exact cost.

[89coupe]

Originally posted by schocker
The red sport is supposed to start at about $50k USD so it will be around the same pricing as an S4/C450/340i.

I liked my infiniti, but I wouldn't get this over one of the germans.

I own a Mercedes as well. The service at Lone Star blows.

As for BMW, I have friends that don't have much good to say.

[lilmira]

Originally posted by riander5


Wait what kind of fully loaded are we talking here...

see what u did there

[01RedDX]

.

[89coupe]

According to Wes at the North Dealership, only the AWD version is coming to Canada this year.:dunno:

[01RedDX]

.

[89coupe]

Originally posted by 01RedDX
Under $60 OTD would definitely be good for what you get.

I was looking at IS 200t, then I liked the idea of the Q50+MB engine but now I want this.

Would be great if you could post the OTD price after your test drive. :)

I will definitely post the info once I have it.

[dj_rice]

This is what I am waiting for as well. Was considering a C450 but no employee discounting and around too much 70K was the one I optioned.

[RX_EVOLV]

Originally posted by 89coupe
According to Wes at the North Dealership, only the AWD version is coming to Canada this year.:dunno:

When I bought my Q50S 2 years ago, every single Q50 they have on the lot was AWD.. they didn't order any RWD in.

So might make sense that they discontinue the RWD all together now for Canada.

[Cos]

.

[benyl]

Originally posted by Cos


Cars are money pits, save your money haha

;)

I would never buy a new car again. Money pits. ;)

[89coupe]

Originally posted by Cos


Cars are money pits, save your money haha

;)

Haha, I was waiting for you to pipe in. The fatherly advice always comes out. I can't help myself.

[Maxt]

Japanese automotive styling has gotten pretty grotesque.

[Cos]

.

[max_boost]

Yup I think it suits you Bradley.

[n1zm0]

They had the base model 2.0L Merc Turbo at the car show and the Q60 was the 3.0L Turbo, but the salesman didn't have any prices on any of the new powerplant versions.

Anyone own a G37 sedan and looked at the Q50's trunk space? Is it less than the G? Seemed like the trunk was the smallest vs all the other midsized luxury sedans I looked at.

[b_t]

Originally posted by Maxt
Japanese automotive styling has gotten pretty grotesque.

it's not great but it's nowhere near as bad as the new Lexus cars. those guys are putting out some of the most horrendously ugly vehicles to ever hit the road, and for some reason they seem to be selling quite well

[Xtrema]

Originally posted by Maxt
Japanese automotive styling has gotten pretty grotesque.

Consider Infiniti is designed by an American with a design studio in London owned by French, in some cases carrying a German engine, Infiniti is as Japanese as California rolls.

[Redlyne_mr2]

I have 2 used Infinitis on the lot, both for almost a year, ones a 2013 m37 and the other is a 2014 hybrid, I can't give them away lol. No one wants Infinitis

[Maxt]

Originally posted by b_t


it's not great but it's nowhere near as bad as the new Lexus cars. those guys are putting out some of the most horrendously ugly vehicles to ever hit the road, and for some reason they seem to be selling quite well
My in laws neighbor in Japan is a senior level exterior designer-aerodynamicist for Toyota. Everytime I see him he shows me models of the new Toyota and Lexus cars and asks me what I think of them. I be as diplomatic as I can be. I did like the LFA, so I kept the conversation on that car as much as I could.


Originally posted by Xtrema


Consider Infiniti is designed by an American with a design studio in London owned by French, in some cases carrying a German engine, Infiniti is as Japanese as California rolls.
Somewhere in its point, probably some Japanese person signed off on it somewhere. But as whole, the entire Japanese car industry lacks the magic it had with the styling pen in the late 80's-early 90's...

[relyt92]

Originally posted by n1zm0


Anyone own a G37 sedan and looked at the Q50's trunk space? Is it less than the G? Seemed like the trunk was the smallest vs all the other midsized luxury sedans I looked at.
Had a Q50 as a loaner, was amazed at how small the trunk it. Quite noticeably smaller than my G37, the Q50 has similar width and length but is quite a bit shallower.


Originally posted by Redlyne_mr2
I have 2 used Infinitis on the lot, both for almost a year, ones a 2013 m37 and the other is a 2014 hybrid, I can't give them away lol. No one wants Infinitis
Those are also like 2 of the worst ones to sell. If they were G's or non hybrid Q you probably wouldn't have too much trouble selling them. Doesn't help that the M is kinda bloated looking.

[avishal26]

I think Infiniti's are a harder sell outside of the Calgary area... people just don't appreciate them.... IMO anyway

And the M's are hard to sell regardless - similar to an Acura RL for example .. not sure why because in the used market they are really good value. The 2013 M37x Sport you have for sale was just over $65k + tax brand new prbly... now for almost 1/2 price with only 39k kms

All that being said, having previously owned an M, currently owning a QX60 and having extensively driven quite a few different models (FX, G37's); Infiniti's are not what they used to be. While my QX has a great interior look / quality / fit and finish, I hate that I hear the electric whine of the power steering pump, my door locks squeak once in a while (replaced under warranty), and I can hear the wiper motor occasionally... Not sure if I would buy an Infiniti again.

However the tech features in the QX60 are just impeccable and Infiniti tends to have a great intuitive interface system compared to others.

The best Infiniti I have ever owned was my 2006 M35x which I sold last year with 166k kms on the clock. My dad still has his 2007 FX35 that still drives like it was new. I had a 2015 Q50 AWD for a loaner once, and the touch screen was kinda slow, and the car didn't handle all that great especially with the electronic steering. Great interior still though.

I think Infiniti's have a lot of room for improvement and are slowly going to get there by 2020. They have added more sound insulation on the newer models as an example...

[89coupe]

I love my 2007 G35S, RWD model. The car has been flawless for almost 10 years now. Just over 158k on it now and zero problems.

I can't wait to test drive this new Q50S, it will be interesting to see how it performs.

I've never seen the new model all decked out, seems like nobody orders them with a spoiler.

[89coupe]

Just test drove the new 2016 400HP Q50S. My old G on the left.

I was definitely impressed, especially for $62K fully loaded inc.GST.

Definitely considering pulling the trigger.

Test driving the new BMW 340M Sport tomorrow. But I have a feeling it will be way more money.

Some pics.

http://02A3C16.NETSOLHOST.COM/images/q50s-a.jpg
http://02A3C16.NETSOLHOST.COM/images/q50s-b.jpg
http://02A3C16.NETSOLHOST.COM/images/q50s-3.jpg

[jacky4566]

Originally posted by Cos


Cars are money pits, save your money haha

;)

But this is a car forum?

[schocker]

Originally posted by 89coupe
Just test drove the new 2016 400HP Q50S. My old G on the left.

I was definitely impressed, especially for $62K fully loaded inc.GST.

Definitely considering pulling the trigger.

Test driving the new BMW 340M Sport tomorrow. But I have a feeling it will be way more money.

Some pics.
I think a reasonably loaded C450/340/S4 are only around $65k so the big increase in price (~$10k!) kind of kills the incentive the 3.7 had. Still can't price the infiniti out on the website though which is super good work by them.

Q50 3.7 SPORT AWD, Deluxe Touring & Technology $51,750
http://infinitinews.com/en-CA/infiniti/canada/releases/infiniti-announces-2015-canadian-pricing-and-model-lineup-for-q50-sports-sedan-qx50-luxury-crossover-and-qx70-luxury-suv

[89coupe]

Originally posted by schocker

I think a reasonably loaded C450/340/S4 are only around $65k so the big increase in price (~$10k!) kind of kills the incentive the 3.7 had. Still can't price the infiniti out on the website though which is super good work by them.

http://infinitinews.com/en-CA/infiniti/canada/releases/infiniti-announces-2015-canadian-pricing-and-model-lineup-for-q50-sports-sedan-qx50-luxury-crossover-and-qx70-luxury-suv

$65k full loaded tax included?

The Q50s with 400hp is only $62k fully loaded all taxes included.

Do any of the other cars in this price range make 400hp?

[Kloubek]

Originally posted by Maxt
Japanese automotive styling has gotten pretty grotesque.

Really? I think the Q50 is a sharp looking car. Better looking than my M37 for sure. But that isn't saying much if you simply don't like the design language. I agree with b_t about Lexus though - I'm not a fan of their new designs.... mainly due to that strange trapezoid grille.

As far as how I feel about Infiniti now that I've had mine for a while:

Interior is beautiful. As my commuting car, I considered bmw 3 and 5 series and Mercedes E series. While both were well built, the BMW was angular and plasticy feeling. The Mercedes felt very high quality, but lacked visual interest imo. While not quite at Mercedes feel, I'm always happy to sit behind the wheel of my car.

Outside took me a while to get used to. I think it is a good looking car, but is already starting to look a bit dated to me. Some of the choices, like the taillights could have had more thought put into them.

Performance is good, but not spectacular. This goes for both handling and power. The competition has Infiniti beat for sure, but this new 400 horsepower addition should help even things up.

The thing I don't like about my car the most is that there are certain things you would have expected for a car that cost some 70g new. The paint, for one. VERY easy to scratch. I have the rubberized coating on my steering wheel peeling already. (In areas that are never touched). No repeaters in the side mirrors. Why no LED DRL treatment like all the competition had by this point? Seat heaters put out a noticeable lack of heat.

Some of the controls lack thought in their programming. Like, why do I press down on the steering wheel to go UP in the playlist? Silly.

There are minor defects that bug me, such as being able to see a puffiness on the seat face that shows clearly where the backing to the embroidered logo is.

But overall, I feel Infiniti puts out a very competent product.... they just don't typically stand out as a leader in any particular area. So when they are pricing vehicles close to par with their competitors, there isn't a lot of reason to choose them.

[BokCh0y]

I really like the look of the new Q50, and with a $62k price tag and 400hp, I'd definitely consider the Q50 for sure.

[schocker]

Originally posted by 89coupe
$65k full loaded tax included?

The Q50s with 400hp is only $62k fully loaded all taxes included.

Do any of the other cars in this price range make 400hp?
No sorry, that was no tax. They are around $55k base, then options/tax would be more like $70. BMW is 320, Merc is 362 and the new S4 should be around 350. For $8k difference it is much more reasonable. Still don't get why you can't build online even when every F1 race is filled with ads about the Q50. Would be interesting to see the price on the 300hp model also.

[Mitsu3000gt]

Originally posted by 89coupe


$65k full loaded tax included?

The Q50s with 400hp is only $62k fully loaded all taxes included.

Do any of the other cars in this price range make 400hp?

C450 is close, it's 362hp and more torque than the Infiniti (384 tq on the MB). I think the benz is a hair faster as well. I drove one back to back with a 2016 335 X-Drive M-Sport (Bimmer was $72K I think) and preferred the Benz, it was just so good in my opinion. The extra power was obvious. You can get them in the mid-high $60's I think and it would be hard to go Infiniti with the prices that close. At least go drive one before you make a decision - in that price range I would go with a better car for an extra $5K or so if you preferred something else. Probably hold it's value better too.

[JohnnyHockey]

I'll buy it off you in 7 years lol

[dimi]

Looks like a great car and a hauling engine. Still though, I'd take a less loaded S4/C450 any day.

[benyl]

Originally posted by 89coupe

Do any of the other cars in this price range make 400hp?

The Benz probably does. They are notorious for under rating their cars.

[rage2]

The same engine in the E43 needed new turbos to make 400hp. Remember that the C43 engine is simply a chipped version of the C400 engine which was like 315hp.

It would be hilarious if the C43 got bigger turbos to make 400hp in the second year.

[01RedDX]

.

[schocker]

Originally posted by rage2
It would be hilarious if the C43 got bigger turbos to make 400hp in the second year.
'Second Year' :rofl:
Need to change it again, perhaps C430 AMG.

[Disoblige]

That side by side shot with the Q50S and G35S does make it look like the perfect upgrade from what coupe has right now, haha. Even the wheels look similar.

[Xtrema]

Originally posted by 01RedDX


I dunno, I've compared the interiors and exteriors and the Q50 definitely has them beat on looks IMO. Driving dynamics are a different story I'm sure, haven't driven any of them.

I hate that double screen look in the Q50 and they didn't hide cheap plastics as well as S4/C43 but looks competitive. Have not driven the 400HP Q50 but sounds like they fixed a lot of issue with the steering.

[01RedDX]

.

[dj_rice]

Why do they not have any pricing on the 3.0T models on the Infiniti Canada website. Just the 2.0T pricing only.

[dj_rice]

.

[Team_Mclaren]

Originally posted by dj_rice
Why do they not have any pricing on the 3.0T models on the Infiniti Canada website. Just the 2.0T pricing only.

:werd:

I noticed the same thing when i tried to build one online, though my browser was fucked.

Cant trust 89coupe on whats fully loaded or not...:rofl:

[max_boost]

89coupe fully loaded means missing navigation lol

Forgot what Inrich fully loaded meant lol

[dj_rice]

Originally posted by Team_Mclaren


:werd:

I noticed the same thing when i tried to build one online, though my browser was fucked.

Cant trust 89coupe on whats fully loaded or not...:rofl:



Infiniti USA has all the models/trims you can get with pricing. I guess I can use that as a base on what to expect somewhat.

But damn that Iridium Blue, best color to be offered from Infiniti. :drool: :drool:

[schocker]

Originally posted by dj_rice
Why do they not have any pricing on the 3.0T models on the Infiniti Canada website. Just the 2.0T pricing only.
Even the 2.0 has only been up for a few weeks even though it has been advertised on TV for months. :rofl:

[JustinMCS]

Their website is shit. The car is at the dealer yet it's not online? Crazy.

[dj_rice]

Website looks like it just got updated. All models on there now


Spoke too soon :rofl: Website isn't working currently :rofl:

[jonni44]

I just priced one out, taxes, freight, PDI, and the one package offered for $3,800, your total cost comes to just short of 65k.

Same price as its German competitors is it not?

[JustinMCS]

Originally posted by jonni44
I just priced one out, taxes, freight, PDI, and the one package offered for $3,800, your total cost comes to just short of 65k.

Same price as its German competitors is it not?

but with more hp.... but i would still buy a 340i

[Xtrema]

Originally posted by jonni44
I just priced one out, taxes, freight, PDI, and the one package offered for $3,800, your total cost comes to just short of 65k.

Same price as its German competitors is it not?

Right in there. B8 S4 is fully loaded at that price. B9 is probably more. C450/43 can be loaded to $70K+ No idea on 340xi.

[schocker]

Originally posted by JustinMCS
but with more hp.... but i would still buy a 340i
Not sure if that option pack is even worth it as it has that weird steering everyone hates. Then you are $57k +gst which isn't too bad at all. That is about $10k less than my ideal c450/s4/340 etc.

[dj_rice]

What....can't get Sport Package option in 3.OT in Aspen Pearl White. :banghead: :banghead:

[jonnycat]

So many options for $65k I think I'd stick with a 392 Charger for $62k, or get a one year old for $50k

[89coupe]

I'm test driving the 340i M Sport & 550i M Sport tomorrow.

The Q50s is by far the most affordable.

[Mitsu3000gt]

Originally posted by 89coupe
I'm test driving the 340i M Sport & 550i M Sport tomorrow.

The Q50s is by far the most affordable.

I drove a 550i X-drive two weekends ago back to back with a S6 - if you are looking at a 550i, you should drive an S6 as well. Fastest car I have ever driven, and one of the nicest. The 550i did not feel fast nor did it feel like it had the kind of HP it does. It's surprisingly slow for it's rated HP. Nice car no doubt but there is better in that range IMHO. I assume you'd be looking at used ones because they are closer to the $100K range than the Q50 is.

[That.Guy.S30]

Sooooo when are they gonna jam this engine into the FX chassis....

[89coupe]

Originally posted by Mitsu3000gt


I drove a 550i X-drive two weekends ago back to back with a S6 - if you are looking at a 550i, you should drive an S6 as well. Fastest car I have ever driven, and one of the nicest. The 550i did not feel fast nor did it feel like it had the kind of HP it does. It's surprisingly slow for it's rated HP. Nice car no doubt but there is better in that range IMHO. I assume you'd be looking at used ones because they are closer to the $100K range than the Q50 is.

Yes, the 550i is used.

I have friends who have owned Audi's and they seem to always have problems.

[Mitsu3000gt]

Originally posted by 89coupe


Yes, the 550i is used.

I have friends who have owned Audi's and they seem to always have problems.

Forget the 550i too if you are worried about owning a $60K+ car off warranty and look at Lexus.

[89coupe]

Originally posted by Mitsu3000gt


Forget the 550i too if you are worried about owning a $60K+ car off warranty and look at Lexus.

I've read that n63tu motor 7/2013 with 445hp and latter is solid.

[Redlined_8000]

Originally posted by That.Guy.S30
Sooooo when are they gonna jam this engine into the FX chassis....

I'm waiting for a 3.0tt Z car. Should be sweet

[89coupe]

Test drove the 340i M Sport today and a 2013 550i M Sport. Was not impressed with the 340i at all. About the only positive was the transmission, nice up shifts, but downshifts seemed to be non existent, even in Sport+ mode.
Also noticed a lot of body roll.

The 550i I enjoyed more, even though it was a bigger, heavier car, it seem to handle better. Both cars seemed very similar in acceleration.

The Infiniti still seems better for the most part. I preferred the more aggressive shifts of the BMW, but preferred the much more responsive and aggressive downshifts/rev matching of the Infiniti.

The Infiniti felt more powerful then both BMW's but would need to get both vehicles out on the highway at the same time to confirm.

Next car to test is a 2014 Audi S6

[Aleks]

Originally posted by 89coupe


Next car to test is a 2014 Audi S6

This should be in a whole different ballpark at least power wise compared to the cars tested so far. I think it could be underrated at 420hp. :dunno:

0-60: 3.7s
1/4: 12.1 @ 115 mph

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2013-audi-s6-test-review

[Mitsu3000gt]

The S6 feels and is a lot faster than the 550i. The 550i also felt slow to me given it's power ratings. It's well known S6 power is under rated, as it is as fast as the M and AMG cars.

By far the best car I have driven in recent memory, for my tastes anyway. Engine and transmission (DCT) are pretty amazing. It's actually a relative bargain compared to a lot of cars in it's class IMO. Better interior than most. It won't be the very best handler though, and it isn't small.

[rage2]

If you think a S6 is anywhere near a E63S in performance, you really need to drive one. I would be surprised if you can find any car magazine tests where it's even close in 1/4 mile. Maybe 0-60 might be close with a better launch setup on the S6.

Don't get me wrong, the BMW 550, Audi S6, E550, they're all quick cars, not knocking the performance. But the M5 and E63S are in their own league.

[Mitsu3000gt]

Originally posted by rage2
If you think a S6 is anywhere near a E63S in performance, you really need to drive one. I would be surprised if you can find any car magazine tests where it's even close in 1/4 mile. Maybe 0-60 might be close with a better launch setup on the S6.

Don't get me wrong, the BMW 550, Audi S6, E550, they're all quick cars, not knocking the performance. But the M5 and E63S are in their own league.

I haven't driven an E63S yet but I would love to. Is the only way to get them now in "S" trim? I thought you could get a regular E63 too which was not quite as quick. I wasn't thinking of the "S" model but I see that one is certainly faster.

C&D got the M5 to do 0-60 in 3.7 and 1/4 mile at 12.0, and the S6 to to 0-60 in 3.7 and the 1/4 mile in 12.1. Those are the numbers that initially impressed me with the "cheaper" S6. I'm sure on a track the M5 would destroy it, but for the average driver who doesn't leave the city, that's pretty good performance for the money IMO. There are a few used ones kicking around for $60-70K.

When I hop into one of these cars from my Civic, I feel like I'm in a rocket ship, then when I drive home after I feel sad :rofl:

[Toms-SC]

Originally posted by 89coupe


$65k full loaded tax included?

The Q50s with 400hp is only $62k fully loaded all taxes included.

Do any of the other cars in this price range make 400hp?

Yes

http://www.beyond.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2017-lincoln-mkz-facelift-2.jpg

[JohnnyHockey]

3.7 seconds:nut:

[redline]

Originally posted by 89coupe


I've read that n63tu motor 7/2013 with 445hp and latter is solid.

that motor has oil burning issues, the issue stems from people not driving them hard enough and the motors never get fully broken in

if you google the engine code and problems or issues you will start to see

[89coupe]

Originally posted by redline


that motor has oil burning issues, the issue stems from people not driving them hard enough and the motors never get fully broken in

if you google the engine code and problems or issues you will start to see

I'm waiting for the Audi dealership to prep the S6 for me. Went and looked at it on the weekend, drool, so nice. Hopefully it drives as nice as it looks and feels.

[n1zm0]

Originally posted by That.Guy.S30
Sooooo when are they gonna jam this engine into the FX chassis....

This new VR30DDTT is supposed to be the replacement for the VQ37VHR, so not an impossible wish.

Too bad the base 3.0TT doesn't come with rwd.

[benyl]

Originally posted by 89coupe


I'm waiting for the Audi dealership to prep the S6 for me. Went and looked at it on the weekend, drool, so nice. Hopefully it drives as nice as it looks and feels.

Spend the extra and get an RS7. You can thank me after.

[89coupe]

Originally posted by benyl


Spend the extra and get an RS7. You can thank me after.

I can't justify spending that much on a car. The only reason I was considering the Infiniti is because how good of a car mine has been. I would keep the new one just as long.

I don't like the look of the RS7, that long sloping back doesn't do anything for me. Almost as bad as a the Porsche Panamera.

The S6 I'm looking at is less then the Infiniti. Audi also told me I can get Audi care up to 200,000km which is awesome.

[dj_rice]

Am I crazy or can you not get a 3.0L 300HP model with the Sport Package option?

[Xtrema]

Originally posted by 89coupe

The S6 I'm looking at is less then the Infiniti. Audi also told me I can get Audi care up to 200,000km which is awesome.

Audi care is a 3rd party warranty product. There is a $100 deductible per claim and you are at the mercy of the adjuster.

I almost didnt get something paid out due to some technicallity.

[gpomp]

fM2OMA1pnh0

[HiSpec]

Originally posted by gpomp
fM2OMA1pnh0

I just finished watching that!! What an engine!! Too bad the nannies decreased the driving experience and dynamics!

[89coupe]

Originally posted by Xtrema


Audi care is a 3rd party warranty product. There is a $100 deductible per claim and you are at the mercy of the adjuster.

I almost didnt get something paid out due to some technicallity.

According to Glenmore Audi that is not correct.

Audi Care is 100% full Audi warranty, no deductible.

I showed him your post, he said, not true.

[heavyD]

Originally posted by gpomp
fM2OMA1pnh0

Nice engine and an agreeable exterior but not a car for anyone that's a fan of spirited driving.

[Xtrema]

Originally posted by 89coupe


According to Glenmore Audi that is not correct.

Audi Care is 100% full Audi warranty, no deductible.

I showed him your post, he said, not true.

Just to get the terms right as I'm guilty as well:

Audi Care is a prepaid maintenance program for all scheduled maintenance. Available for new or CPO cars.

http://www.audi.ca/ca/web/en/customer-area/finance/audi-select-.html#page=/ca/web/en/customer-area/care-and-maintenance/audi-care-plan.html

Audi After Care is an extended warranty program:

http://audiaftercare.ca/mechanical-breakdown-protection/

There are levels of program and coverage levels. Platnium coverage has a $100 deductible and there is an exclusion list.

http://audiaftercare.north99.com/mechanical-breakdown-protection/exclusions/

Emission system is where my last contention was which failed immediately after my last thermostat replacement.

If Glenmore has made it a business practice to cover the deductible cost, then your sales guy is right. Royal Oak doesn't as I have paid that twice in that last 2 years.

Audi After Care and Audi warranty is completely 2 different operations. There is different numbers to call if you need a tow. I mistakenly called Audi for a tow and they said my car is out of warranty and found out After Care number is different.

Lesson learnt here? Don't own Germans when original warranty ran out.

EDIT: The other way to get beyond original 4 year coverage is buying CPO. CPO comes with 2 extra years from original service date but slightly different coverage than the original 4 year.

http://cpo.audi.ca/en/faq

[Xtrema]

Back on topic:

Q50 recalled on steering software glitch.

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/16/infiniti-q50-sedan-steering-recall/