Honda Accord > * (split from Golf R thread)

[Darkane]

Well guys let's put it into perspective.

4.2 is 'quick' but it's not really fast. Let me explain.

The manufacturers are still addressing 0-60 times because that's what people know. Unfortunately it doesn't mean much in the real world. A GT350 does 0-60 SLOWER than a golf R, but at the end of 400m it gets there about a second quicker and is traveling 10mph faster.

This isn't a fair comparison but it illustrates my point.

Cars can do 4 second sprints these days because they're engineered to excel at certain parameters. I had a turbo D-series civic I built. It did 0-60 in probably 5.5+ but I managed a 13.7@103. Not too far behind the golf R, especially the manual model (apples and such).

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by Darkane
Well guys let's put it into perspective.

4.2 is 'quick' but it's not really fast. Let me explain.

The manufacturers are still addressing 0-60 times because that's what people know. Unfortunately it doesn't mean much in the real world. A GT350 does 0-60 SLOWER than a golf R, but at the end of 400m it gets there about a second quicker and is traveling 10mph faster.

This isn't a fair comparison but it illustrates my point.

Cars can do 4 second sprints these days because they're engineered to excel at certain parameters. I had a turbo D-series civic I built. It did 0-60 in probably 5.5+ but I managed a 13.7@103. Not too far behind the golf R, especially the manual model (apples and such).

This is so true. I'm more interested in 0-100, 5-60 & passing power.

[buh_buh]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point


This is so true. I'm more interested in 0-100, 5-60 & passing power. You agree with more real world numbers, but more interested in 0-100 times? How often are you doing 0-160kph runs in the real world? I'm not sure I've ever done that outside of the drag strip. I think a more real world number is 30-60 or 60-100.

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by buh_buh
You agree with more real world numbers, but more interested in 0-100 times? How often are you doing 0-160kph runs in the real world? I'm not sure I've ever done that outside of the drag strip. I think a more real world number is 30-60 or 60-100.

Maybe. Never ended up at a red light next to a mustang @ 1 AM? 0-100 tells a better tale than 1/4 mile (eg poor 60 foot due to crappy factory tires.) 0-100 for my car is rated at 13.4 seconds stock vs the 1/4 mile of 14.0 seconds. Again, due to the crap fuel saver tires that came with it.

[b_t]

Huh.. a bad launch (aka a bad 60' time) will affect your 0-100 times and 1/4 mile times equally

[Aleks]

5-60 mph is more important to me than 0-60. 1/4 mile mph is the other number that tells how fast a car really is.

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by b_t
Huh.. a bad launch (aka a bad 60' time) will affect your 0-100 times and 1/4 mile times equally That's true. I can't figure out then why my car is rated @ 14 flat @ 103 mph and also 0-100 in 13.4

5-60 is very important. Just ask anyone in a GTI or STI with stock tune.

[benyl]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
That's true. I can't figure out then why my car is rated @ 14 flat @ 103 mph and also 0-100 in 13.4

5-60 is very important. Just ask anyone in a GTI or STI with stock tune.

Because it takes .6 seconds to accelerate from 100 to 103 mph?

[b_t]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
That's true. I can't figure out then why my car is rated @ 14 flat @ 103 mph and also 0-100 in 13.4

5-60 is very important. Just ask anyone in a GTI or STI with stock tune.

a bad launch will show when your trap speed is unusually high for your ET in the quarter mile.. your car traps pretty fast for a 14 second ET, which is indicative of problems leaving the line. typical for a factory FWD

just quickly lookin at Hot Rod Drag Week results guys trapping around 103mph were running mid to high 12s

[Sugarphreak]

...

[blownz]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
0-100 for my car is rated at 13.4 seconds stock vs the 1/4 mile of 14.0 seconds.

Out of curiosity, what kind of car and what is the MPH in the 1/4 mile? Obviously it is going over 100mph in the 1/4 mile, but that seems odd to be going that quick and taking 14 seconds.

[Mitsu3000gt]

I don't mind all the X-60 times because that's where most people drive most of the time, especially if the car is a daily driver. I don't really care about 1/4 mile times because there would never be a scenario where I would be going 0-100MPH. X-60 times give me a good idea of what I might actually experience.

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by blownz
Out of curiosity, what kind of car and what is the MPH in the 1/4 mile? Obviously it is going over 100mph in the 1/4 mile, but that seems odd to be going that quick and taking 14 seconds.

2014 Accord coupe 6 speed with the 278 hp (ha!) V6. I tack it up to how awful the factory tires are for grip. It really moves once it hooks up for what it is. Just ask the dude in his 2014 STI lol :rofl: I've seen a variety of stock traps from 101 - 103 mph.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2013-honda-accord-coupe-v-6-manual-test-review

[Redlined_8000]

Originally posted by Mitsu3000gt
I think it's awesome you can buy a ~$42K hatch that is that fast. I wish there were more things like it. For me, 4.2 sec wouldn't need "waking up" :rofl:

Its quick from a launch but it does run out of breath when doing top end pulling on the highway. Thats where it needs a bit of help. And im talking for the 2017 version with the 6sp DSG. 2018 version gets a 7sp DSG however horse power remains the same at 292.

Im happy with it its a great car stock. A tune really does wake it up though. There is nothing breakthrough about this car. It just combines the power you get from your average performance 2.0T engine and adds DSG and launch control. Thats all it does. Its not anything revolutionary here lol.

[Redlined_8000]

Originally posted by 94boosted


I wonder if that's the euro-spec one with the performance package?

The North American spec ones don't get any more power or better tires so I don't see how it could be quicker than the 15-17's. And with (I'm assuming) closer gear ratios it'll still need 3rd gear to hit 60MPH.

Yeah that euro spec one had the Performance pack with the Michelin cup2 tires, Akropovic exhaust and the 10hp increase above 2017 version.

Maybe the 7sp is a bit more snappy for 0-60 times.

[riander5]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point


Maybe. Never ended up at a red light next to a mustang @ 1 AM? 0-100 tells a better tale than 1/4 mile (eg poor 60 foot due to crappy factory tires.) 0-100 for my car is rated at 13.4 seconds stock vs the 1/4 mile of 14.0 seconds. Again, due to the crap fuel saver tires that came with it.

Sorry are you saying your v6 accord is rated at a 13.4 quarter mile :nut:

[HiSpec]

Originally posted by Redlined_8000


Yeah that euro spec one had the Performance pack with the Michelin cup2 tires, Akropovic exhaust and the 10hp increase above 2017 version.

Maybe the 7sp is a bit more snappy for 0-60 times.

They get all the goodies from the Clubsport car :(

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by riander5


Sorry are you saying your v6 accord is rated at a 13.4 quarter mile :nut:

No, it's rated @ 14.0. Lowest I've seen is a 13.8 for a magazine review. I believe it is a mid to high 13 second car when it hooks up nicely. It's taken down Audi A4's, Q5 3.0 T, Camry V6, a WRX STI and other cars that run around a 14.0. A legit sleeper for sure.

[colinxx235]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point


No, it's rated @ 14.0. Lowest I've seen is a 13.8 for a magazine review. I believe it is a mid to high 13 second car when it hooks up nicely. It's taken down Audi A4's, Q5 3.0 T, Camry V6, a WRX STI and other cars that run around a 14.0. A legit sleeper for sure.

Something tells me the STI wasn't pushing his car... that or has no clue how to drive/shift cause it would roast you

the other cars you listed are in a much slower class (much like your accord)

[ercchry]

I'd rather see lap times than 1/4 mile... 0-60 is also important for the sensation that most will feel actually living with the car around town... but if it doesn't turn, who cares

[benyl]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point


No, it's rated @ 14.0. Lowest I've seen is a 13.8 for a magazine review. I believe it is a mid to high 13 second car when it hooks up nicely. It's taken down Audi A4's, Q5 3.0 T, Camry V6, a WRX STI and other cars that run around a 14.0. A legit sleeper for sure.

Not in Calgary.

You might hit 100 mph in the 1/4 on a -25 day, but that would be limited by traction. Breaking 14 seconds would require a perfect launch and probably a tailwind.

On a good day, you car might make 240 hp at the crank, maybe 200 at the wheels.

While I'm sure your car is fast, anything with a turbo and similar HP will walk away from you.

[bjstare]

Originally posted by colinxx235


Something tells me the STI wasn't pushing his car... that or has no clue how to drive/shift cause it would roast you

the other cars you listed are in a much slower class (much like your accord)

:werd:

[Redlined_8000]

Originally posted by benyl


Not in Calgary.

You might hit 100 mph in the 1/4 on a -25 day, but that would be limited by traction. Breaking 14 seconds would require a perfect launch and probably a tailwind.

On a good day, you car might make 240 hp at the crank, maybe 200 at the wheels.

While I'm sure your car is fast, anything with a turbo and similar HP will walk away from you.

Yeah I agree.

Even my old G35 which was about 330hp could only manage mid 90mph in edmonton. I had intake manifold cat delete catback and tune.

100 mph out of a 280hp accord will be hard.

Turbos>n/a for power in calgary.

[Redlined_8000]

Double post. Dam phone.

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by benyl


Not in Calgary.

You might hit 100 mph in the 1/4 on a -25 day, but that would be limited by traction. Breaking 14 seconds would require a perfect launch and probably a tailwind.

On a good day, you car might make 240 hp at the crank, maybe 200 at the wheels.

While I'm sure your car is fast, anything with a turbo and similar HP will walk away from you.

mKQSkGwx21U

I owned a 1998 LS1 Z28 with 305 hp stock. This 3.5 V6 is not far off from what I recall (albeit with 100 ft lbs/less torque stock.) General consensus is that the 278 hp is more like 290 - 295 at the crank with the stick shift. Very healthy V6. It's fail wheel drive and stick. So that puts drive train loss @ around what 11-12%?

I've owned 240 hp cars. This is not a 240 hp car. And your statement about turbo and similar hp is bs. If you read my post, you'd see that I've beaten a 2014 stock STI (yes, he was trying, couldn't get past my bumper. we did 3-4 pulls from various speeds not from a light due to his grip advantage.) as well as a 2015 Q5 3.0 T, 2014 A4. All turbo cars. I don't really care if you believe me or not..it's more fun if people think it's just a little grandpa put put car :D Watch the video, look at the trap speed I posted. It's no race car at all, but it is a great troll car.

Sorry for thread derail, anyone know who Reflex Silver Golf R owner is HEYBERT? I'd like to send him a b day card.

[Sugarphreak]

...

[never]

^ benyl is talking about power losses with altitude, not what the cars can make. Do an uncorrected dyno pull and you'll probably be disappointed...with SAE correction, it'll probably be comparable to what the cars are supposed to put out.

Around here, dyno correction factors are usually 1.10-1.15. So that means any pull has 10-15% power added to the numbers to be comparable...so cars are down 10-15% from a pull at sea level (or whatever SAE conditions are). And altitude hits NA cars harder than turbo/blower/nitrous combos.

Before I lived in the Calgary area, I used to hate coming here for race events...cars easily lost 0.5 sec or more in the 1/4, and some MPH too. But at least everyone was on an even playing field.

[GingeRRRBeef]

I thought this was a Golf R thread? :dunno:

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by Sugarphreak
Pretty sure my Q5 with the 2.0t could take your Accord in a quarter mile race :D

Let's do it legal! Is your Q5 tuned? Mine does have a significant reduction in wheel weight from stock. 18.6 lbs vs 31 lb stock wheels.

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by never
^ benyl is talking about power losses with altitude, not what the cars can make. Do an uncorrected dyno pull and you'll probably be disappointed...with SAE correction, it'll probably be comparable to what the cars are supposed to put out.

Around here, dyno correction factors are usually 1.10-1.15. So that means any pull has 10-15% power added to the numbers to be comparable...so cars are down 10-15% from a pull at sea level (or whatever SAE conditions are). And altitude hits NA cars harder than turbo/blower/nitrous combos.

Before I lived in the Calgary area, I used to hate coming here for race events...cars easily lost 0.5 sec or more in the 1/4, and some MPH too. But at least everyone was on an even playing field.

That's true, but I'm not doing ricer math and I've certainly seen Toma for dyno time before. Just stating that it is absurd to think that a fwd stick car underrated @ 278 is going to make 200 fwhp here even with all that said.

[Mitsu3000gt]

I thought the N/A HP loss was approximately 5% per 1,000 ft of altitude, so that makes Calgary ~17% loss. Then what would drivetrain loss be, ~15%? 290 HP * 0.83 * 0.85 = 204 WHP if I did that correctly. Obviously a very rough calculation.

[Sugarphreak]

....

[gpomp]

I will put money on the Q5. When is this race happening?

[Darkane]

Originally posted by Sugarphreak


No this is a Hallow_point Honda accord thread, although I can see your confusion

Mods, please change the title


No tune, but I am rocking the MY2014 which is the year they bumped the horsepower and added a sporty 8 speed auto

I am actually pretty sure it would take an Accord V6

2014 Q5:
0-60mph: 5.8s
1/4 Mile: 14.3 @ 86mph

20xx Accord V6:
0-60mph: 5.9s
1/4 Mile: 14.4 @ 100mph

Kind of a lame drag race, but it would be close... in Calgary, I'd bet the fact that the audi has a turbo will put it ahead of the accord.


OH, but I run colour matched 18" OZ's on mine... lol

Just to add to the trolling and off-topicness:

Accord does 5.6 and 14.0@103

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2013-honda-accord-coupe-v-6-manual-test-review

The accord will be very close to the Audi at altitude and should fly by at the quarter. Also does the Audi do 96mph in the quarter or 86?

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by Sugarphreak


No this is a Hallow_point Honda accord thread, although I can see your confusion

Mods, please change the title


No tune, but I am rocking the MY2014 which is the year they bumped the horsepower and added a sporty 8 speed auto

I am actually pretty sure it would take an Accord V6

2014 Q5:
0-60mph: 5.8s
1/4 Mile: 14.3 @ 86mph

20xx Accord V6:
0-60mph: 5.9s
1/4 Mile: 14.4 @ 100mph

Kind of a lame drag race, but it would be close... in Calgary, I'd bet the fact that the audi has a turbo will put it ahead of the accord.


OH, but I run colour matched 18" OZ's on mine... lol

Lol you're a cool guy and I wouldn't want to be a jerk, but I have already beaten a 2014/2015 maybe newer Q5 3.0 T from a roll my factory wheels and winters. The 14.4 is for the automatic and or sedan Accord v6. Mine is the 6 speed man pedal (Sugarphreak approved?) coupe. Lighter and faster. Legit race car yo. So without a tune, I'll bet you lunch for sure. Shit, I've really f&cked this poor thread.

reflex silver Golf R owners are arrogant drivers/midget pussy's based on my personal encounter with HEYBERT in Calgary. Better??

[Sugarphreak]

...

[Mitsu3000gt]

Definitely a difficult car to find numbers on. I can't find anything reliable on 2014+ 2.0T.

Motor Trend got a 2013 Q5 3.0T (Not SQ5) 0-60 in 5.5sec and 1/4 mile in 14.1sec @ 96.5 MPH

C&D got the 2014 diesel Q5 0-60 in 5.8sec and 1/4 mile in 14.6 sec @ 92 MPH

C&D got the 2013 Q5 2.0T 0-60 in 6.9sec and 1/4 mile in 15.3 sec @ 90 MPH, so I assume the 2014+ is a good bit faster with the new engine tune & tranny.

Nothing really too helpful...looks like the only way to find out is a race :)

[Hallowed_point]

Trap speed owns that Q5 though (100-103 mph vs 90 - 96.5 mph. I'll give him credit, I had to giver to pass him :D

[Sugarphreak]

...

[benyl]

Originally posted by Mitsu3000gt
I thought the N/A HP loss was approximately 5% per 1,000 ft of altitude, so that makes Calgary ~17% loss. Then what would drivetrain loss be, ~15%? 290 HP * 0.83 * 0.85 = 204 WHP if I did that correctly. Obviously a very rough calculation.
[thread derail!]
haha, I am guessing Hallowed point never read the thread where I said the E46 M3 is slower than dog shit on a hot day.

So let's take his dyno numbers. 256whp. We don't need to even talk about driveline loss as it is built into the number.

I am going to assume here that the number isn't raw and corrected for sea level power.

Official elevation is 3,428 ft.

That would put his car at 212 hp if we take the 5% rule.

The problem is that the density altitude is killer here in Calgary. today is fine. It's cold. It's 2400 ft right now. Good luck with traction.

On a 25 degree day, it can be as high as 7000 ft. That drops power to 170whp.

A turbo car with a MAF, like the STI doesn't compensate as well as a turbo car that has a MAP, like a BMW N54/N55.

The STI will not increase boost pressure as altitude goes up. It suffers like a NA or supercharged engine. It's still better than NA.

The N54/N55 will increase boost pressure to make up for altitude. The N54 (when I had one) would increase boost from the normal 8psi at sea level to 12 psi here in Calgary, especially on a hot day. The N54 made 300hp at sea leve and 300 hp here in calgary, uncorrected.

NA cars like the accord suffer huge on 30 degree days.

[/thread derail!]

[Mitsu3000gt]

Interesting, so the turbo car has to have a MAP instead of a MAF to eliminate the elevation variance entirely, assuming the turbo has enough headroom to compensate?

[benyl]

Originally posted by Mitsu3000gt
Interesting, so the turbo car has to have a MAP instead of a MAF to eliminate the elevation variance entirely, assuming the turbo has enough headroom to compensate?

yup.

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by benyl

[thread derail!]
haha, I am guessing Hallowed point never read the thread where I said the E46 M3 is slower than dog shit on a hot day.

So let's take his dyno numbers. 256whp. We don't need to even talk about driveline loss as it is built into the number.

I am going to assume here that the number isn't raw and corrected for sea level power.

Official elevation is 3,428 ft.

That would put his car at 212 hp if we take the 5% rule.

The problem is that the density altitude is killer here in Calgary. today is fine. It's cold. It's 2400 ft right now. Good luck with traction.

On a 25 degree day, it can be as high as 7000 ft. That drops power to 170whp.

A turbo car with a MAF, like the STI doesn't compensate as well as a turbo car that has a MAP, like a BMW N54/N55.

The STI will not increase boost pressure as altitude goes up. It suffers like a NA or supercharged engine. It's still better than NA.

The N54/N55 will increase boost pressure to make up for altitude. The N54 (when I had one) would increase boost from the normal 8psi at sea level to 12 psi here in Calgary, especially on a hot day. The N54 made 300hp at sea leve and 300 hp here in calgary, uncorrected.

NA cars like the accord suffer huge on 30 degree days.

[/thread derail!]

I actually do recall your line about the E46. Are you the definitive guide to how fast cars are across the board?

You obviously know a great deal about dynos and correction factor. I just know who I've beaten. I'm certainly not the stig, but that STI was truly sad. As in, laughable. That is an interesting read though. I did not know about MAP vs MAF correction. Thanks for that

Anyone with a stock STI who wants to do a run @ Castrol, send me a PM.

I've owned factory turbo and NA V8 cars. I know what to expect. I actually did not count on the accord being so quick for a family sedan based ride.

[heavyD]

Wow. What the hell happened to this thread?:banghead:

[Tik-Tok]

Originally posted by heavyD
Wow. What the hell happened to this thread?:banghead:

Beyond getting back to it's bench racing roots? Too many appliance and angry white men threads I guess.

[GingeRRRBeef]

Originally posted by heavyD
Wow. What the hell happened to this thread?:banghead:

Hallowed_point trying to justify buying an accord

[lilmira]

We found a solution to save McLaren's season.

[GingeRRRBeef]

Originally posted by Tik-Tok
Too many appliance and angry white men threads I guess.

The NDP will do that to ya

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by GingeRRRBeef
Hallowed_point trying to justify buying an accord

My brother has a MK7 GTI, nice cars. But seriously, who is HEYBERT? I just want to give him a hug.

[rage2]

I got walked by a first gen WRX/STi the other day in my RC-F. :cry:

[Konj]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point


I actually do recall your line about the E46. Are you the definitive guide to how fast cars are across the board?

You obviously know a great deal about dynos and correction factor. I just know who I've beaten. I'm certainly not the stig, but that STI was truly sad. As in, laughable. That is an interesting read though. I did not know about MAP vs MAF correction. Thanks for that

Anyone with a stock STI who wants to do a run @ Castrol, send me a PM.

I've owned factory turbo and NA V8 cars. I know what to expect. I actually did not count on the accord being so quick for a family sedan based ride.


It's my lucky day. I have a stock STI. Let's do this.

[Disoblige]

Originally posted by Konj

It's my lucky day. I have a stock STI. Let's do this.
Winner gets to post results in "Interesting unique fact or experience about you" thread.

No novel tho, thanks :rofl:

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by Konj



It's my lucky day. I have a stock STI. Let's do this. word. What year? I think the older STIs were considerably faster.

Or just head to Mexico where we can do it for free.

[Konj]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
word. What year? I think the older STIs were considerably faster.

Or just head to Mexico where we can do it for free.

2015. I am not cheap, I am not doing anything for free. I want results on paper, stamped, and officially approved. When is the next Castrol drag race?

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by Konj
2015. I am not cheap, I am not doing anything for free. I want results on paper, stamped, and officially approved. When is the next Castrol drag race? alright amigo, race wars is officially on for 2017. Looks like street legals are on for April.28

[Sugarphreak]

...

[Konj]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
alright amigo, race wars is officially on for 2017. Looks like street legals are on for April.28

April 28 works for me. You?

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by Konj


April 28 works for me. You?

I'm in Calgary , but I think I can make it work. If not the Friday, the 29th would be much easier instead of driving up after work .

Honestly, I live beside 22X..that makes a lot more sense.... unless you're also in E town. We can get an impartial 3rd party to witness/record

2 Fast 2 Real 4 Calgary

[Konj]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point


I'm in Calgary , but I think I can make it work. If not the Friday, the 29th would be much easier instead of driving up after work .

Honestly, I live beside 22X..that makes a lot more sense.... unless you're also in E town. We can get an impartial 3rd party to witness/record

2 Fast 2 Real 4 Calgary

No, I want it on paper and I want it done legally so that results can be posted on beyond. I don't want a recording of us drag racing illegally.

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by Konj
No, I want it on paper and I want it done legally so that results can be posted on beyond. I don't want a recording of us drag racing illegally. Not sure why you would post that. Anyways, how about April.29th?

[Darkane]

We should do a beyond Castrol night. I want to go try and get a 12.99 lol.

[Tik-Tok]

Originally posted by Darkane
We should do a behind Castrol night. I want to go try and get a 12.99 lol.

Sounds a little... ghey.

[Darkane]

Originally posted by Tik-Tok


Sounds a little... ghey.

Damn you auto correct. I've been thwarted.

10 internets to you for ninja quoting before my ninja edit.

[Konj]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
Not sure why you would post that. Anyways, how about April.29th?

1) To prove that you don't have the balls to show up after dissing me in a previous post
2) And if you do show up, to call you out on your bullshit that your accord family sedan is faster than a stock STI

I already said yes April 29th. Buy ticket to post proof you are coming.

[vengie]

Originally posted by Konj


1) To prove that you don't have the balls to show up after dissing me in a previous post
2) And if you do show up, to call you out on your bullshit that your accord family sedan is faster than a stock STI

I already said yes April 29th. Buy ticket to post proof you are coming.

The internet is serious business :rofl:

[buh_buh]

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k2Sl7Ncpefw/maxresdefault.jpg

[Hallowed_point]

I must be lost, I thought that this was an appliance forum. Here we are talking about ILLEGAL street racing. I disrespected the whole STI family.

I'm really wondering what specifically I said that offended you. Yeah, that stock 2014 STI I raced was slow as shit. Don't believe me, ask my gf. She was laughing too. Maybe that was you, it had an AB plate..are you slightly tubby and 30-35 years old dark brown hair?

Agree on beyond.ca Castol night. All the shit talkers can race. Winner gets the respect.

[never]

We have a Castrol track rental set up for May 26...sign up and 403Media should be catching everything on film.

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by never
We have a Castrol track rental set up for May 26...sign up and 403Media should be catching everything on film.

Awesome!! Are slow family cars eligible??

[Konj]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
I must be lost, I thought that this was an appliance forum. Here we are talking about ILLEGAL street racing. I disrespected the whole STI family.

I'm really wondering what specifically I said that offended you. Yeah, that stock 2014 STI I raced was slow as shit. Don't believe me, ask my gf. She was laughing too. Maybe that was you, it had an AB plate..are you slightly tubby and 30-35 years old dark brown hair?

Agree on beyond.ca Castol night. All the shit talkers can race. Winner gets the respect.

Are you going to show up or not? Post proof of a ticket purchased and we can go from there.

[GingeRRRBeef]

Shit can we sponsor this race?

[adidas]

I have a feeling Hallowed_Point has no intentions of showing up. :poosie:

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by adidas
I have a feeling Hallowed_Point has no intentions of showing up. :poosie: Come say hi

But seriously. STI Man - were you or were you not in the Okaganan this past long weekend? Makes much more sense for us to do a group meet. This is all really silly. I've already raced your car, just from a roll and not a stop. Hope your transmission and axles don't scatter too hard.

[GingeRRRBeef]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
Come say hi

But seriously. STI Man - were you or were you not in the Okaganan this past long weekend? Makes much more sense for us to do a group meet. This is all really silly. I've already raced your car, just from a roll and not a stop. Hope your transmission and axles don't scatter too hard.

At this point, you should probably just delete your account.

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by GingeRRRBeef


At this point, you should probably just delete your account.

Why? I'm not scared of the internet. I've been on here for years. :love:

[GingeRRRBeef]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point


Why? I'm not scared of the internet. I've been on here for years. :love:

LOLZ User #105339

[dimi]

I can see how this ends. Accord loses..."his sti was tuned"

[GingeRRRBeef]

Originally posted by dimi
I can see how this ends. Accord loses..."his sti was tuned"

"He had lighter wheels..."

[Disoblige]

Sugar, you should go as well, lol. I wish I could be there but I'll be in Valleyview for a sports tournament :(

[Sugarphreak]

....

[Redlined_8000]

I live right by 22x with a stock 2017 R. Let's do it.

[Redlined_8000]

Originally posted by rage2
I got walked by a first gen WRX/STi the other day in my RC-F. :cry:

I had a JDM sti type RA almost beat my C63 on the highway lol. Dam elevation.

[LilDrunkenSmurf]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
Come say hi

But seriously. STI Man - were you or were you not in the Okaganan this past long weekend? Makes much more sense for us to do a group meet. This is all really silly. I've already raced your car, just from a roll and not a stop. Hope your transmission and axles don't scatter too hard.

The 2014 and 2015 STi are different chassis. Much different cars.

[b_t]

Originally posted by Tik-Tok


Sounds a little... ghey.

oh fuck yeah I'm there

[killramos]

I have been avoiding this thread because I thought "what could people still be talking about golf R orders for" that was a mistake :rofl:

Are there any other cars we should be aware of that your accord with lighter wheels will beat in a race?

:rolleyes:

[Konj]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
I must be lost, I thought that this was an appliance forum. Here we are talking about ILLEGAL street racing. I disrespected the whole STI family.

I'm really wondering what specifically I said that offended you. Yeah, that stock 2014 STI I raced was slow as shit. Don't believe me, ask my gf. She was laughing too. Maybe that was you, it had an AB plate..are you slightly tubby and 30-35 years old dark brown hair?

Agree on beyond.ca Castol night. All the shit talkers can race. Winner gets the respect.

I don't remember if it was me or not, give me your gfs digits so I can ask her. Also post pic of gf - it will help my memory.

[riander5]

Originally posted by Konj


I don't remember if it was me or not, give me your gfs digits so I can ask her. Also post pic of gf - it will help my memory.

Are you tubby or not own up

[Konj]

Originally posted by riander5


Are you tubby or not own up

Tubby drove a 2014 STI. In a previous post I said I drive a 2015 STI.

[Hallowed_point]

How to stir up a bunch of IT nerds who play internet tough guy 101 right here. Sorry bro, but you couldn't handle my Accord and you certainly couldn't handle my Colombian gf who looks like a hotter Little Lupe Fuentes (not work safe, don't google it from your desk.) Funny thing is I saw a newer STI last night in Bridlewood and thought of you. :love:

I'm certainly not racing an R haha..but I will let you guys know how bad I smoke my brother's stock 2015 GTI. Sort of on topic?

How do I tell if it was a 14 or 15 STI? It had a huge wing and was very quiet in the distance. That's all I remember. Along with tubbies sad face.

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by Konj


I don't remember if it was me or not, give me your gfs digits so I can ask her. Also post pic of gf - it will help my memory.

Do a search. I posted her before. No face though. Maybe hit up the hub for wank material.

[Konj]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
How to stir up a bunch of IT nerds who play internet tough guy 101 right here. Sorry bro, but you couldn't handle my Accord and you certainly couldn't handle my Colombian gf who looks like a hotter Little Lupe Fuentes (not work safe, don't google it from your desk.) Funny thing is I saw a newer STI last night in Bridlewood and thought of you. :love:

I'm certainly not racing an R haha..but I will let you guys know how bad I smoke my brother's stock 2015 GTI. Sort of on topic?

How do I tell if it was a 14 or 15 STI? It had a huge wing and was very quiet in the distance. That's all I remember. Along with tubbies sad face.

Lol @ this guy.

[killramos]

This accord sounds savage.

[ercchry]

#factoryfreak bro!

[benyl]

Originally posted by killramos
This accord sounds savage.

It's raw. It's got a stick.

[Hallowed_point]

Funny how some of you are the ones who stirred this all up. I just answered some questions and then the usual peanut gallery showed up :D

I'm not even mad, it's hilarious to me. Especially good old Errchy. Hows your back bro? happy 420

[Tik-Tok]

Originally posted by killramos
This accord sounds savage.

VTEC yo.

[riander5]

Originally posted by Konj


Tubby drove a 2014 STI. In a previous post I said I drive a 2015 STI.

Alright man good on you for not being a tubster

[ercchry]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
Funny how some of you are the ones who stirred this all up. I just answered some questions and then the usual peanut gallery showed up :D

I'm not even mad, it's hilarious to me. Especially good old Errchy. Hows your back bro? happy 420

What? You don't want to race my car bro? It's slow... only makes 300ft/lbs :cry:

[Hallowed_point]

Originally posted by ercchry
What? You don't want to race my car bro? It's slow... only makes 300ft/lbs :cry:

The only crying that would occur would be out of your pucker hole if beyond.ca ever had that charity boxing match & you signed a waiver. But you're too much of a bitch to back up your yapper. You've been ducking me for years, even Sugarphreak gave me the edge. Since you love bringing up old posts. Wanna dig that one up again?

A couple body shots and you'd be hobbling around pretty good I bet. :D

[GingeRRRBeef]

Originally posted by Hallowed_point
How to stir up a bunch of IT nerds who play internet tough guy 101 right here. Sorry bro, but you couldn't handle my Accord and you certainly couldn't handle my Colombian gf who looks like a hotter Little Lupe Fuentes (not work safe, don't google it from your desk.) Funny thing is I saw a newer STI last night in Bridlewood and thought of you. :love:

I'm certainly not racing an R haha..but I will let you guys know how bad I smoke my brother's stock 2015 GTI. Sort of on topic?

How do I tell if it was a 14 or 15 STI? It had a huge wing and was very quiet in the distance. That's all I remember. Along with tubbies sad face.

I love it how braggarts always resort to calling everyone IT nerds and dorks who lives in their parents' basements when they're on the losing end of an argument.

I'm pretty sure everyone is sick of your armchair racing so either show up at Castro or STFU.