PDA

View Full Version : Recommendation: Compact car for $15-20K?



amorak
03-11-2019, 10:02 PM
Hey all,

I have a family member looking for a compact car in the $15-20K range. I haven't shopped for a car in that range for a while, so I am looking for some suggestions...

Right now I am leaning towards recommending a 2019 Kia Forte, or looking at a used 2016 Civic, as they are both in the $17-19k range.

Any suggestions for a good, reliable compact in that price range that I'm missing?

Thanks Beyonders!

NRGie
03-11-2019, 10:14 PM
2L Civic

I travel often for work and drive a bunch of rentals on a monthly basis.

When comparing entry level compacts, Civics are the best.

Sugarphreak
03-12-2019, 02:16 AM
...

ExtraSlow
03-12-2019, 07:46 AM
In the city, Honda fit > all. Highway, a little more weight gives a more relaxed drive.

Buy this one. Cheap, 11,000kms, so it's basically new.
85180

A2VR6
03-12-2019, 08:14 AM
I'd say a Golf TSI would be my choice.

tonytiger55
03-12-2019, 09:29 AM
Civic would be my choice. If its just city driving i'd go for the Fit, but get one 2015 onwards.

Corolla or Matrix is a option. But interior is outdated compared to the Honda. The 2019's have caught up.
If Kia is a option, would not Hyundai Accent or Elantra be a option..?
Are they paying cash/finance or both..?

Mitsu3000gt
03-12-2019, 10:38 AM
2016/17 Civic would be the easy choice in that price range IMHO. I don't think there is a better compact out there for the price, and you can still get a hatchback if you want.

max_boost
03-12-2019, 11:07 AM
I got a Kia Forte for a rental and it's a good car. My first experience with a heated steering wheel. Comfortably seats 5 and can put a few bodies in the trunk. :love:

I don't think you can really go wrong with any of those cars tho.

- - - Updated - - -


I'd say a Golf TSI would be my choice.

Always Always Always the best choice for a compact but now I'm back to being budget baller and not just budget lol

Xtrema
03-12-2019, 11:41 AM
Stay away from Civic's with 1.5T engine, especially used. There is oil dilution issue.

I believe they should have fixed the issue around 2019 model and going forward. Anything before that is up to owner getting the recall done.

Hyundai and Kia is fighting a engine recall right now for Theta II engine catching fire. Luckily I believe 2019 Forte is on Nu so it's not part of the recall. New Kia depreciates like mad tho, so make sure you are ready to drive that way past warranty to make it worthwhile.

And like Extraslow said, if you don't leave the city, Fit is a good car at that price range. But if you merge on highway or carry people onto highway often, you may not want a Fit.

msommers
03-13-2019, 03:38 PM
Partner has had her 2014 Hyundai Accent GLS, bought almost a year used, and we've had zero issues with it just regular maintenance. Bit noisy on the highway but more than acceptable. I think she paid something like $13K for it back then? Decent on gas too so we drive it almost exclusively. ~$30 for 500+km.

rx7boi
03-13-2019, 03:53 PM
In the city, Honda fit > all. Highway, a little more weight gives a more relaxed drive.

Buy this one. Cheap, 11,000kms, so it's basically new.
85180

For a newer vehicle it's gone through quite a bit. It's a rebuilt title, Carproof shows a claim of $21k and later sold at auction.

AndyL
03-13-2019, 06:14 PM
10.5k$ for a brand new Nissan Micra. It's a shortened versa so it's a known entity... Decent enough, flip when warranty's almost up

tonytiger55
03-13-2019, 09:37 PM
10.5k$ for a brand new Nissan Micra. It's a shortened versa so it's a known entity... Decent enough, flip when warranty's almost up

The issue I have with the Micra is the engine size relative to its body.
In the UK, that car is usually bought with a 1L engine. You can get a 1.3. Its a city run around. You can take it on the highway, its not ideal though.
It has a 1.5L engine here. I personally think thats waaay too big for that size. But meh..

AndyL
03-14-2019, 12:12 AM
I had the 88 1.3(?) Version - kinda handy could dead lift it in the parking lot (don't ask) easily. We can't have nice things in North America you know ;)

nicknolte
03-14-2019, 01:28 AM
10.5k$ for a brand new Nissan Micra. It's a shortened versa so it's a known entity... Decent enough, flip when warranty's almost up

The Micra is a solid, all-around vehicle. I'd buy another stripper model if I had a need for another car

Mitsu3000gt
03-14-2019, 08:46 AM
When we were shopping we looked a the Micra because it was $9999 with a MT and no options (not even power windows). It is a POS, and ridiculously underpowered but that was expected for the starting price. Want an automatic and basic options that come standard on every other vehicle? It jumps up to around $16K and you might as well buy a 'real' car. That's how it was a few years ago anyway. I think it's still good for someone who wants a warranty and basic transportation for the lowest possible cost, but that's about it.

98brg2d
03-14-2019, 08:46 AM
The issue I have with the Micra is the engine size relative to its body.
In the UK, that car is usually bought with a 1L engine. You can get a 1.3. Its a city run around. You can take it on the highway, its not ideal though.
It has a 1.5L engine here. I personally think thats waaay too big for that size. But meh..

Are you saying the engine is too big for the car? If that is the case, I don't think I've ever heard anybody ever complain about an engine being too big for a car. It is hard to assess how fast (or slow) a Micra is since the world outside of America doesn't often do instrumented tests beyond fuel economy and braking distance but I would have a hard time thinking the car is overpowered if it can't muster a 1/4 mile time under 15 seconds. If it could do that, nobody would be buying a Fiesta ST. Automakers will rarely make anything other than a sports car that can routinely be driven past the limits of adhesion, whether in braking, cornering or accelerating, it just doesn't sit well with buyers and turns them off to the model, and brand.

Not to derail the thread or anything. I would go Civic or Cruze hatchback myself, especially if you can find a diesel (they do exist in hatchback but maybe not yet at the stated price point). Even if the Cruze is not the fastest, best handling or most reliable, its styling is enough to keep me interested long term.

realazy
03-14-2019, 08:54 AM
I agree with the others saying that nothing beats a hatchback for the city. We have a Nissan Versa Note, it's basically Nissan's Honda Fit and it does it's job. I think I might replace it with a Fit though, as the Versa Note just feels cheap.

These little hatchbacks have so much room once you fold the rear seats down flat, it's like a mini cargo van. Tons of leg and head room for the rear passengers and the rear doors almost open 90° wide for better access too.

ExtraSlow
03-14-2019, 08:58 AM
For a newer vehicle it's gone through quite a bit. It's a rebuilt title, Carproof shows a claim of $21k and later sold at auction.
Good detective work. I didn't look into that car at all. Agree it's not a bargain now that these facts are known.

Mitsu3000gt
03-14-2019, 09:01 AM
I agree with the others saying that nothing beats a hatchback for the city. We have a Nissan Versa Note, it's basically Nissan's Honda Fit and it does it's job. I think I might replace it with a Fit though, as the Versa Note just feels cheap.

These little hatchbacks have so much room once you fold the rear seats down flat, it's like a mini cargo van. Tons of leg and head room for the rear passengers and the rear doors almost open 90° wide for better access too.

In 2015 we bought a Fit but the Versa was our second choice. Similar cars size-wise, but the Honda had the magic seats (you can fit a bike in there which is ridiculous), ~30% more power, better resale, no rattles/creaks, a better CVT, more options on the cheap trim levels, and had a much nicer interior. Rear leg room is amazing in both, not much different than an S-class or something haha. I've had a Versa Note as a rental a few times too in the States.

realazy
03-14-2019, 09:30 AM
In 2015 we bought a Fit but the Versa was our second choice. Similar cars size-wise, but the Honda had the magic seats (you can fit a bike in there which is ridiculous), ~30% more power, better resale, no rattles/creaks, a better CVT, more options on the cheap trim levels, and had a much nicer interior. Rear leg room is amazing in both, not much different than an S-class or something haha. I've had a Versa Note as a rental a few times too in the States.

Agreed on the Versa Note being cheaper on all fronts, the seats still all fold flat though, never tired putting a bike in though. At the time in 2014, the loaded top trim (SL) of the Versa Note was less than $22,000 all in, and still offered 0% financing. It also came with the 360° camera and navi, and that's what sold us. A comparable Fit was closer to $25,000 and Honda doesn't have the 360° camera.

Mitsu3000gt
03-14-2019, 09:41 AM
Agreed on the Versa Note being cheaper on all fronts, the seats still all fold flat though, never tired putting a bike in though. At the time in 2014, the loaded top trim (SL) of the Versa Note was less than $22,000 all in, and still offered 0% financing. It also came with the 360° camera and navi, and that's what sold us. A comparable Fit was closer to $25,000 and Honda doesn't have the 360° camera.

The magic seats in the Fit actually fold up. The seat-bottoms of the rear seats fold straight up which creates a huge cavity in front of the rear seats and behind the front seats, you can fully put a bicycle in there upright. It was a big selling point for us anyway. I think you can get them in the C-HR too.

Sounds like you got a pretty great deal on the Versa, when we were looking the comparable one to the Fit was more than $22K from what I remember, and financing was not 0%. The Fit LX was ~$21K all-in after negotiations.

msommers
03-14-2019, 10:02 AM
Along the same vein but in the 8K-10K range, would a Honda Fit still be the best bet? Fiance's sister needs a reliable car to get to-from work, I think essentially zero highway.

AndyL
03-14-2019, 10:34 AM
When we were shopping we looked a the Micra because it was $9999 with a MT and no options (not even power windows). It is a POS, and ridiculously underpowered but that was expected for the starting price. Want an automatic and basic options that come standard on every other vehicle? It jumps up to around $16K and you might as well buy a 'real' car. That's how it was a few years ago anyway. I think it's still good for someone who wants a warranty and basic transportation for the lowest possible cost, but that's about it.

It's still that way - but the power toys are nothing but future headaches depending on how you look at it. All shit that breaks after warranty and costs thousands to fix

A2VR6
03-14-2019, 04:07 PM
Along the same vein but in the 8K-10K range, would a Honda Fit still be the best bet? Fiance's sister needs a reliable car to get to-from work, I think essentially zero highway.

I would say so. The 2nd gen will probably be at the high end of the budget, but you can easily get the first gen for the low end of the budget. I miss our 2nd gen one quite a bit... its pretty fun imho in the sport trim with the manual.

Sugarphreak
03-14-2019, 10:34 PM
...

msommers
03-15-2019, 07:46 AM
Cheers guys. Any mechanical issues I should keep an eye out for, on either generation?

realazy
03-15-2019, 08:35 AM
Along the same vein but in the 8K-10K range, would a Honda Fit still be the best bet? Fiance's sister needs a reliable car to get to-from work, I think essentially zero highway.

Well... heres where cheap Nissans come in. The 2014 Nissan Versa Note I mentioned, its worth around 10gs now.

A2VR6
03-15-2019, 09:16 AM
Cheers guys. Any mechanical issues I should keep an eye out for, on either generation?

Not that im aware of... both versions were pretty much bulletproof. Just the regular maintenance stuff.

C4S
03-15-2019, 10:05 AM
how about those Focus ST? heard good thing about them ...

tonytiger55
03-16-2019, 08:53 PM
Are you saying the engine is too big for the car? If that is the case, I don't think I've ever heard anybody ever complain about an engine being too big for a car. It is hard to assess how fast (or slow) a Micra is since the world outside of America doesn't often do instrumented tests beyond fuel economy and braking distance but I would have a hard time thinking the car is overpowered if it can't muster a 1/4 mile time under 15 seconds. If it could do that, nobody would be buying a Fiesta ST. Automakers will rarely make anything other than a sports car that can routinely be driven past the limits of adhesion, whether in braking, cornering or accelerating, it just doesn't sit well with buyers and turns them off to the model, and brand.

Not to derail the thread or anything. I would go Civic or Cruze hatchback myself, especially if you can find a diesel (they do exist in hatchback but maybe not yet at the stated price point). Even if the Cruze is not the fastest, best handling or most reliable, its styling is enough to keep me interested long term.

No, I don't think your derailing the thread. Its good to hear a different perspective.

I would say the engine is too big for the car. It was mostly sold as a 1L or 1.3 in the UK ages ago. The 1L was popular as fuel is expensive in the UK. Lots of people had the Micra as a 1L. It was cheap, good run around and stupidly reliable. My sisters 1996 Micra engine outlasted the body.

The 1.4 - 1.8 engines would be for the mid size cars like the Ford focus, Vauxhall (Opel) Astra and VW Golfs. 1.6 being the most popular.
Hell my dad had had a family saloon with the 1.6 engine. My cousin had a BMW 3 series with a 1.6L(yes it was shit). Though for those size cars, the 1.8-2L engines were preferable due to the power to weight ratio, fuel economy and cost of fuel. For example, in that category optimum engine size that people would buy for Toyota Corolla would actually be the 1.6L. But ideally for power to weight ratio, I would say the 1.8L is better which is what you have here in North America.

So when I see the Micra as a 1.5L I think its overkill. Its like putting a 2.4L in a Honda Civic. For its day to day use, no need to go higher than a 1.3.
The Micra is tailored to a specific market and sells really well in the UK. Thats due to its dinky size, weight and small engine. But in north America I dont think that idea works as much. Im even wondering why they sell it here, especially with people being fatter, wider roads and straighter roads. The specific demographic that buys this car in the UK, drives a Honda Odssey or SUV here in north America.
That being said, bigger engines are preferred for automatics for smoother gear transitions. But with car computer tech advancing so much I don't think thats a big issue anymore. Especially with CVT's.