Does this seem right to you guys?

[403Gemini]

http://www.car-videos.com/performance/view.asp?id1=55&id2=75

i dunno something about my car being that close to an Audi doesnt seem right (granted this is in ideal settings, my car up here would be 17-18's :D lol)

[Skylinelover]

That is wierd.

[403Gemini]

even says im close to a pontaic grand am GT .... :confused:

like ive seen other sites rate my car almost identical to this one, but are they underating most of the other cars on this site?

[QuasarCav]

Quattro eats alot of power from the drivetrain. It also adds weight.

I wouldn't be surprised, alot of cars fall into the 8.0-9.0 0-60 range.

[habsfan]

didnt the 97 1.8t only have 150hp too?

[QuasarCav]

grand am's are slow. Even the GT's.

They only get an extra 5hp from the ram-air, My friend has a GT and even the lowly cavalier can show it some brake lights.

[Dirty_SOHC]

26.10 seconds to hit 100 mph....lol:eek:

[403Gemini]

my 24.10 is superior hahaha :D

[A2VR6]

Quatto's especially with the 1.8T are dog slow unless you do some mods. When you have a 3400 pound car with only 150 hp, I dont think too much can be expected. :(

[Texas]

0-80MPH in 14.6 Seconds, yet it does the quarter in 16.30@84, 1.7 seconds tp accel 4mph, nevermind I have a groundless arguement.:banghead:

[Ben]

That doesn't seem odd to me, as mentioned, AWD, heavy and only 150hp.

My Times in my VW gti were substantially better than those, however my car weighs 1100lbs less and has more hp. 0-60 6.9 sec, 1/4 at [email protected] in calgary.

turbo upgrade and a performance chip solves that power dought pretty fast.

[badseed]

Buddy owns this car and that seems about right.....unfortunat