stardust
10-19-2004, 07:00 PM
Hi there,
Over the past 4 yrs, I've had 3 speeding tickets......one of them being a Photo Radar ticket which I'm told doesn't really count in terms of demerits (you don't get demerits for these)......but can a Photo Radar ticket still be counted as a ticket by your Insurance company?
So I got my driver's abstract today. It shows NO demerits I guess because my other 2 tickets were as follows:
#1 in Sept 2001
#2 in July 2002
It's my understanding that a person's demerits are removed after 2 yrs has passed since your conviction date (conviction date is the date you pay your fine/contest it in court, etc).
So I guess because over 2 yrs has passed since I received (and paid) these above 2 tickets, that's why I have no demerits....and then of course there's the Photo Radar ticket (got that in June 2004) but no demerits there.
The reason I care about any of this is.........I have to get some increased coverage on my auto insurance (as I travel some for work and figured I better let them know that, so I'm covered properly)..........so I called up my insurance company this afternoon and mentioned the above. I then asked how the new changes for Oct 1st, 2004 might impact my insurance. She told me they're still in the process of going back over everyone's insurance to see if they're due for a credit.....BUT that they're going to look at each person's driving record for the past 3-4 yrs, to check for speeding tickets, etc.
So this is when I sorta got nervous. Although I have no demerits, if they check back over the past 4 yrs, they'll see these 2 tickets above................How much do you think these 2 tickets will impact my insurance? (I'm 37 yrs old by the way, have never been in an accident, never had a claim).
Will they also find, on whatever data base they might use, a record of my Photo Radar ticket or is it definite that Photo Radar tickets don't ever count and are not acknowledged by insurance companies (mostly because there's no way to prove the insured individual is the one who got the photo radar ticket, it could have been someone else driving - which I believe is why they don't give demerits, for that same reason).
ALSO.....do you think an insurance company looks at the REASON for the ticket?
My one ticket was for speeding slightly in a playground zone.
My other one was for driving 48 km/h here in Airdrie where much to my surprise, the speeding limit in all residential areas is 30km/h (I truly didn't know this but found out the hard way)....HOWEVER, on my Driver's Abstract, THIS ticket is down as "exceeding posted speed limit on highway".....which is BS....the little Municipal Enforcement dude who wrote me the ticket must have coded it incorrectly.............I didn't know this until I got this abstract.
I don't know what I can do about this now, or whether it even matters. Which do you think looks worse to an insurance company.....a ticket for speeding in a residential area or speeding on the highway?
I will be doing a lot of highway driving in my job so maybe a ticket (even though the reason is wrong) citing I was speeding on the highway is something I want to dispute because that's not what it was for....though not sure how I'd go about disputing it now..I didn't make a photocopy of the ticket and I paid by cash so I don't have any documents..all I could do was go down to the Provincial Court building in Airdrie (where I paid it) and see if they had some kind of record.
Thanks in advance
Lisa
Over the past 4 yrs, I've had 3 speeding tickets......one of them being a Photo Radar ticket which I'm told doesn't really count in terms of demerits (you don't get demerits for these)......but can a Photo Radar ticket still be counted as a ticket by your Insurance company?
So I got my driver's abstract today. It shows NO demerits I guess because my other 2 tickets were as follows:
#1 in Sept 2001
#2 in July 2002
It's my understanding that a person's demerits are removed after 2 yrs has passed since your conviction date (conviction date is the date you pay your fine/contest it in court, etc).
So I guess because over 2 yrs has passed since I received (and paid) these above 2 tickets, that's why I have no demerits....and then of course there's the Photo Radar ticket (got that in June 2004) but no demerits there.
The reason I care about any of this is.........I have to get some increased coverage on my auto insurance (as I travel some for work and figured I better let them know that, so I'm covered properly)..........so I called up my insurance company this afternoon and mentioned the above. I then asked how the new changes for Oct 1st, 2004 might impact my insurance. She told me they're still in the process of going back over everyone's insurance to see if they're due for a credit.....BUT that they're going to look at each person's driving record for the past 3-4 yrs, to check for speeding tickets, etc.
So this is when I sorta got nervous. Although I have no demerits, if they check back over the past 4 yrs, they'll see these 2 tickets above................How much do you think these 2 tickets will impact my insurance? (I'm 37 yrs old by the way, have never been in an accident, never had a claim).
Will they also find, on whatever data base they might use, a record of my Photo Radar ticket or is it definite that Photo Radar tickets don't ever count and are not acknowledged by insurance companies (mostly because there's no way to prove the insured individual is the one who got the photo radar ticket, it could have been someone else driving - which I believe is why they don't give demerits, for that same reason).
ALSO.....do you think an insurance company looks at the REASON for the ticket?
My one ticket was for speeding slightly in a playground zone.
My other one was for driving 48 km/h here in Airdrie where much to my surprise, the speeding limit in all residential areas is 30km/h (I truly didn't know this but found out the hard way)....HOWEVER, on my Driver's Abstract, THIS ticket is down as "exceeding posted speed limit on highway".....which is BS....the little Municipal Enforcement dude who wrote me the ticket must have coded it incorrectly.............I didn't know this until I got this abstract.
I don't know what I can do about this now, or whether it even matters. Which do you think looks worse to an insurance company.....a ticket for speeding in a residential area or speeding on the highway?
I will be doing a lot of highway driving in my job so maybe a ticket (even though the reason is wrong) citing I was speeding on the highway is something I want to dispute because that's not what it was for....though not sure how I'd go about disputing it now..I didn't make a photocopy of the ticket and I paid by cash so I don't have any documents..all I could do was go down to the Provincial Court building in Airdrie (where I paid it) and see if they had some kind of record.
Thanks in advance
Lisa