PDA

View Full Version : MR2 vs. ?



Redlyne_mr2
10-19-2004, 10:09 PM
So the rx7, 300zx and supra were all direct competitors of eachother in their time. What was the MR2's direct competitors? The gen 2 was sort of alone in the market place.

thinmyster
10-19-2004, 10:21 PM
fiero hahah not
thats not even funny
hope no one thinks im serious

LLLimit
10-19-2004, 10:28 PM
Sr20det
and honda civic..

civicrider
10-19-2004, 10:29 PM
wouldnt crx/del sol be more against the mr2 then a civic?

Redlyne_mr2
10-19-2004, 10:34 PM
The sr20det engine was never offered here. The Mr2 is a sports car the civic is not. Starting price for a second gen mr2 na was $24Kcnd and for the turbo starting price was around $32Kcnd

boostless
10-19-2004, 10:59 PM
well, as far as power / stock 1/4 mile times went, turbo DSMs seem to be in the same arena? not sure the gradient for handling between the 2 tho...
both 2.0 L 4 cyl 16 v turbo etc, both close in hp/trq figures?

MR.TWO
10-20-2004, 01:54 PM
doesn't the mr2 turbo beat the porsh boxter s and the mr2 g limited was 1 sec slower??

cloud7
10-20-2004, 02:29 PM
Originally posted by Redlyne_mr2
Starting price for a second gen mr2 na was $24Kcnd and for the turbo starting price was around $32Kcnd

I always wanted one of those... only if I had $32K back when I got my learners... now it is too late.

I don't think the 2nd gen MR2 had any direct competitors... it was unique in the way that it was mid-engine. As I recalled the Supra Turbo back than was pretty close in straight line speed, but much larger (2+2), front engine, and more expensive. The 300ZX TT was was a lot more expensive and maybe a little quicker. The RX-7 Turbo back then really needed a re-design by the time the 2nd gen MR2 came around... and it was more expensive. I really can't think of any more cars that were direct competitors of the MR-2.

FiveFreshFish
10-20-2004, 02:36 PM
Originally posted by thinmyster
fiero hahah not
thats not even funny
hope no one thinks im serious

The Fiero was a competitor for the first gen.

EK 2.0
10-20-2004, 02:56 PM
Originally posted by boostless
well, as far as power / stock 1/4 mile times went, turbo DSMs seem to be in the same arena? not sure the gradient for handling between the 2 tho...
both 2.0 L 4 cyl 16 v turbo etc, both close in hp/trq figures?


werrd...the Turbo DSM's...

in terms of acceleration numbers in the same ballpark...but around a roadcourse...the SW would spank the DSM...man that chassis could handle...too bad the 2G's came out after the SW's demise here in N/A...

mr2mike
10-20-2004, 03:07 PM
Yeah Porsche Boxter S's aren't that quick... They can launch hard but I've raced one with a buddy in his DSM (exhaust/intake) and we stayed with him. So I think an mr2 would pull from it in 2-3rd.

4CylFiero
10-24-2004, 11:47 PM
Originally posted by FiveFreshFish


The Fiero was a competitor for the first gen.

HAHAH Fieros are good enough to surprise alot of MR-2's I absolutely embarrased a Super charged 1st gen with my fiero 4 cylinder and all :), I'm dying for a shot at a 2nd Gen.

Ashkente
10-25-2004, 12:48 AM
Originally posted by 4CylFiero


HAHAH Fieros are good enough to surprise alot of MR-2's I absolutely embarrased a Super charged 1st gen with my fiero 4 cylinder and all :), I'm dying for a shot at a 2nd Gen.

Was he asleep? :rofl: Or did you get that Quad-4 in there?... :thumbsup:

4CylFiero
10-25-2004, 06:59 AM
:)
Otherwise he would have been asleep.

3S-GTE
10-25-2004, 12:59 PM
Originally posted by 4CylFiero


HAHAH Fieros are good enough to surprise alot of MR-2's I absolutely embarrased a Super charged 1st gen with my fiero 4 cylinder and all :), I'm dying for a shot at a 2nd Gen.


oh oh just wondering how much whp are u pushing on that quad4? look really nice set up

QuasarCav
10-25-2004, 01:02 PM
The W41 option was around 190hp stock.

4CylFiero
10-25-2004, 01:54 PM
Originally posted by 3S-GTE



oh oh just wondering how much whp are u pushing on that quad4? look really nice set up


There is a dyno video on beyond somewhere, i got 153 WHP, that was running really rich for unknown factors. Currently im collecting parts for a rebuild so i can lower my compression and go forced induction. Hopefully before i even get the turbo on i can dyno 170-180 WHP with 8.5:1 compression.

GT-FOUR
10-30-2004, 11:34 PM
turbo DSM's were competitive with the Celica Alltrac's (turbo 4WD) of the time in our market. Overseas the GT4 was competitive with the STi and Evo up to 1998 when toyota stopped producing them.

As for mk2 MR2's...I don't really know. Sort of in a league of their own... :thumbsup:

blueripper6
10-31-2004, 12:22 AM
Del Sol I guess








HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Competition?:drama: :rofl:

stealth
10-31-2004, 11:47 PM
ford probe:nut:

lol jk

blueripper6
11-01-2004, 12:19 AM
never speak again.

Ek9Max
11-02-2004, 12:03 AM
300zx

stealth
11-02-2004, 04:01 AM
lol

like stated b4 its in a league of its own.

With that being said, i dont find many people racing me, just looking at it, revving and giving the thumbs up. They are all scared.

The only car i can think of is 300zx like ek9max said.

toyotaboi
11-30-2004, 01:57 AM
what about nsx?

Redlyne_mr2
11-30-2004, 10:15 AM
Originally posted by toyotaboi
what about nsx?
The NSX was triple the price but the performance was very similar