PDA

View Full Version : Shaw Throttling BT



Fluidic
04-07-2005, 05:09 PM
Canadian ISP Shaw has started using packet shaping technology to throttle the bandwidth of its Bit Torrent users, says broadbandreports, quoting a “self-proclaimed company insider”.

" 'This came about due to customer complaints about High-Speed Internet being... well... not high-speed,' the self-professed insider proclaims.

"Turns out there was a lot (A LOT) in BT traffic in Vancouver, so much so that it was causing congestion in the RF/Fiber cable plant, or so I've been told. Cost to fix: $2 to $3 million".

The report, from Karl Bode, says Shaw allegedly green-lighted the use of an Ellacoya switch to limit Bit Torrent traffic at various hubs on the Shaw network.

“While the idea started in the Cordova area of Vancouver, the source claims, it has now been applied to the entire Shaw network in order to regain some of their ‘lost’ bandwidth,” says Bode, adding:

“Of course once you take the route of throttling applications, users - when not giving you a verbal black eye - begin their quest to get around the bandwidth blockade. Shaw users are already eyeing open-source pre-alpha workarounds (like Rodi), waiting for them to evolve in order to beat the efforts of the ISP's.”

Chester
04-07-2005, 05:11 PM
Haven't they been doing this for the past couple months?

Fluidic
04-07-2005, 05:13 PM
My search of Beyond brought up a 50/50 belief that this was true. Since it's in the news, it's kinda like fact now. I posted this simply for all of the non-believers.

koopkoop2
04-07-2005, 06:13 PM
What's their definition of "throttled"? I'm watching my Torrent clock 200 kb/s right now.

BlackArcher101
04-07-2005, 06:30 PM
You got a link for that article?

Fluidic
04-07-2005, 07:12 PM
Let me find it.

Fluidic
04-07-2005, 07:13 PM
Here you go.

http://p2pnet.net/story/4460

AllGoNoShow
04-08-2005, 12:08 AM
Throttle as in not 800kb a sec. Which I have gotten before when I first started with shaw, since then it has gone down hill, alot.

sputnik
04-08-2005, 06:59 AM
I dont mind. Usenet is still much better than BT ever was.

BumpinTalon
04-08-2005, 09:47 AM
BT is a much easier, user-friendly affair though. usenet, notsomuch, you need to know exactly what you are looking for and how to find it, it's not just point-and-click like BT, but it is true that there is more stuff on usenet.

sputnik
04-08-2005, 09:56 AM
usenet is pretty point and click if you have the right software and a decent news feed.

Mr. Burns
04-08-2005, 10:14 AM
I haven't had any problems with BT being slow...

KoukiS14
04-08-2005, 04:07 PM
Originally posted by mrburnsvw
I haven't had any problems with BT being slow...

me either :dunno: