View Full Version : How much Weight = .1sec in the 1/4?
CSMRX7
05-13-2005, 03:30 PM
So how much weight do I need to drop (approximately) to pick up .1 sec in the 1/4 mile?
QuasarCav
05-13-2005, 03:34 PM
I've heard 100lbs, calculations like this are not an exact science.
mdeleon
05-13-2005, 04:22 PM
^^^ye i was told that as well
1995_GTI_VR6
05-13-2005, 04:38 PM
i thought it was about 100lbs + 1 HP? i dont know...:burnout:
sputnik
05-13-2005, 04:40 PM
weight has nothing to do with net horsepower
tsi_neal
05-13-2005, 05:08 PM
ive always heard that 10hp or 100lbs will get you .1 in the 1/4
But its such a general statement that i cant take any of it as fact. A 500hp car and a 510hp car is ALOT different than 130hp and 140hp in one setup a driver can actually tell the difference, in the ohter i dont think a clock can tell the difference.
Id also like to continue my rant about power curves and that 10hp across a 4000rpm spread is gonna do SO much more than 10 more peak hp, etc but the topic was about weight...
Redlyne_mr2
05-13-2005, 05:58 PM
You notice the lossed in weight much more in autox and track days.
88CRX
05-13-2005, 06:02 PM
why are you trying to pick up a tenth :rofl: :rofl:
14 second car y0! :D
CSMRX7
05-13-2005, 06:12 PM
Cause thats the difference in a 14 sec car and a 13 sec car :D
I wanna do it without mods!!
JAYMEZ
05-13-2005, 06:21 PM
Ditch your spare tire , your air pump , abs , AC , plastic containers in the back , passenger seat :rofl:
Barking_Spidre
05-13-2005, 06:25 PM
Lose some weight ya fat bastard. :D
DannyO
05-13-2005, 06:40 PM
Gaining .1 seconds depends on the car, what do you drive?
Originally posted by DannyO
Gaining .1 seconds depends on the car, what do you drive?
:werd:
It's not exactly a linear relationship, depends on a lot of factors as well.
lam-boy
05-13-2005, 07:39 PM
you can maybe take a guess its his Rx7 :D
JordanEG6
05-13-2005, 07:44 PM
Originally posted by sputnik
weight has nothing to do with net horsepower
i think he means adding 1 hp AND losing a 100lbs = -.1 s on the strip
nine4t4
05-13-2005, 08:35 PM
Stripping out weight, and horsepower/torque are kinda related in the realm of acceleration. Sorry Sputnik but you're spaced out.
(Yes, I do get that his math was confusing)
There isn't a direct connection. Aerodynamics and gearing also matter.
Here's what we used to do.
-Remove Spare
-ditch the jack and tools
-rip out A/C, if your car is serious you're allowed to sweat
-rip out rear seat
-rip out passenger seat (or install vibrating massage, a stripped car with a massage chair for the ladies says alot)
-rip out passenger seat
-remove carpet, radio, headliner, glovebox, any sound insulation (dynamat is great but dense)
You can squeeze a couple hundred from the above, figure 50 for spare and tools, 50 for the rear, 40 for the front, 20 for carpet and insulation. maybe 10 for a cheap stereo, .5 lbs for a glove box, 7 for the AC, .2 for the ashtrays.
have fun
pitwipe
05-13-2005, 08:48 PM
:werd: Yep, all that and a decent sized dump before you get to the track... and your set!
blueripper6
05-13-2005, 08:54 PM
Really its very simple. Its 4.32^23 RCM/100HP - 1/4Mile. Now that gives you the equilibrium between your car and the track. Now you take that 4.32^23 RCM/100HP - 1/4Mile (answer say 500TRD) so its 4.32^23 RCM/100HP - 1/4Mile = 500TRD, now TRD is Track resistance diameter. So 500TRD is on a .292 wide track(race city) 500 to the square root of the track (.292) is along the lines of 1.21 JGW, you now put your time in the 1/4 multiply by the JGW feature, multiple by 43.292/.994 JIGAWATZ.
That puts you around 100 lbs for .1 :D :D :D
BerserkerCatSplat
05-13-2005, 10:30 PM
^ I bet a lot of people would have believed those calculations if it wasn't for the JIGAWATZ! :D :rofl:
DannyO
05-13-2005, 11:47 PM
Originally posted by blueripper6
Really its very simple. Its 4.32^23 RCM/100HP - 1/4Mile. Now that gives you the equilibrium between your car and the track. Now you take that 4.32^23 RCM/100HP - 1/4Mile (answer say 500TRD) so its 4.32^23 RCM/100HP - 1/4Mile = 500TRD, now TRD is Track resistance diameter. So 500TRD is on a .292 wide track(race city) 500 to the square root of the track (.292) is along the lines of 1.21 JGW, you now put your time in the 1/4 multiply by the JGW feature, multiple by 43.292/.994 JIGAWATZ.
That puts you around 100 lbs for .1 :D :D :D
Oh dam really, thats awesome, now where can I buy the flux capacitor for it?
CSMRX7
05-14-2005, 01:01 AM
Screw the .1 sec I ran .7 sec faster tonight, and I was too lazy to even pull the spare tire LOL!!!
88CRX
05-14-2005, 11:47 AM
Originally posted by CSMRX7
Screw the .1 sec I ran .7 sec faster tonight, and I was too lazy to even pull the spare tire LOL!!!
awesome!!! 13.4?
CSMRX7
05-14-2005, 12:38 PM
Originally posted by 88CRX
awesome!!! 13.4?
14-.7 = 13.29 @ 104
88CRX
05-14-2005, 01:01 PM
Originally posted by CSMRX7
14-.7 = 13.29 @ 104
jeez thats awesome..... so now how much wait to loose 3 tenths for next weekend.
CSMRX7
05-14-2005, 01:02 PM
300 lbs!!! Ya right I doubt thats gonna happen, but a couple of mods would put me into the 12s no problem.
mikestypes
05-15-2005, 06:57 PM
It is about percentages, not specific weights. Dropping 100 lbs on a 4000 car will do alot less than dropping 100 lbs off a motorcycle.
A 10% drop in weight is similar to a 10% gain in HP.
Xtrema
05-15-2005, 07:20 PM
Here you go.
Lose 1100lbs = 2s
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=776885
But you don't have much of a car left.
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/features/0208scc_scared27_zoom.jpg
||
V
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/features/0208scc_scared20_zoom.jpg
Christianl
05-15-2005, 08:34 PM
rofl Im gonna buy a car and do that haha
djstefan
05-16-2005, 05:37 PM
Loosing weight wont really help that much. The best way to get your times down, wear this hat:
http://www.handa-accessories.com/hat.jpg
Mr. Burns
05-16-2005, 05:49 PM
^:rofl:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.