https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...-off-1.6659654
They better be shipping my peanut butter and bananas for my PBJ, or I'm gonna be mad.
https://calgaryherald.com/news/local...-be-locked-out
No lockout according to Herald.
Printable View
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...-off-1.6659654
They better be shipping my peanut butter and bananas for my PBJ, or I'm gonna be mad.
https://calgaryherald.com/news/local...-be-locked-out
No lockout according to Herald.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
If you make it uneconomic to be employed, you won't be employed.
You're not entitled to higher wages.
Gain skills/ experience and move on.
The final carbon friendly refrigerator grant payment cleared
They're not asking for higher wages.Quote:
Originally Posted by vengie
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoreads
Typically bad reporting by the CBC I guess then.Quote:
Amid negotiations for higher wages, Teamsters Local Union 987 said that 527 out of 534 at the location have been told they will be laid off effective Thursday.
They're mostly asking for improved working conditions.Quote:
According to Taylor, Loblaw was offering a "straight money offer" that did not include any rules or regulations around working conditions. He said the company would not change anything the union had asked for that did not involve money.
Name checks outQuote:
Originally Posted by whoreads
Whore Ads.
I personally would not turn down a 32% raise unless shit was real bad.
At least they get to spend Christmas with their families.
Why the fuck do you need to join a union to pack grocery?
How else you gonna get more than minimum wage, for a minimum wage job?Quote:
Originally Posted by Team_Mclaren
Lol, weird.
Turns out first world basic working conditions are better than no paycheck at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by vengie
I couldn’t care less about loblaws, but I do enjoy this.
The empty shelves at all the No Frills reminds me of......Quote:
Originally Posted by bjstare
Haha, funny shit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcticcat522
Quote:
Another issue revolved around workers receiving better shifts according to seniority.
So union seniority BS shooting their own foot? You don't say.Quote:
"That was one of the things that members wanted back in the agreement," he added. "And as far as we can see, we don't see any monetary costs associated with putting those shift preference languages back into collective agreement."
Nobody hates entry level workers more than unions. But it's the perfect crime. Make entry level work less attractive, so you need to pay more to get workers, then wages go up for everyone and it looks reasonable.
Genius.
How? Guaranteed Loblaws caves as the shelves go bare before the union does.Quote:
Originally Posted by Xtrema