Quote:
Originally posted by codetrap
I agree with you completely. However, that wasn't the tone of his post. He's implying that the state has no right to impose limitations on the individual, for example, using any drug he wants no matter how destructive to his body it is. I am countering that there are limitations, for good reasons. I don't really want to be on the hook for some meth-head to be in ICU taking up a very expensive and valuable bed, possibly displacing someone who's leading a productive life. Make sense?
And who are you to decide the fate of another?