This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Could seems the wrong term
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Could seems the wrong term
Like "Based on a true story" for movies, this writer takes a LOT of liberties filling in the back-story. This thing reads like a Facebook post from that cousin's "informed" spouse...This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
So I get this is a stretch but I can't stop feeling like Trump very much lead directly to killing those people.
- Trump executes Soleimani, for reasons.
- Iran is like WTF yo, puts everything on alert.
- Iran retaliates (for IMO obvious reason) but doesn't kill anyone. Either intentional or not.
- Warns people to stay away.
- US scrambles aircraft.
- Iran fks up and shoots down an airliner.
I get Iran most likely did it, but if Trump hadn't killed Soleimani for the legit reasons or the conspiracy reason of distracting from impeachment, those people would be alive. Now I am not suggesting Trump or the US should have foreseen this, just play stupid games, win stupid prizes?
Cos...
is that what the families of all the dead want to hear are hypothetical scenarios to back the politicians claims that the killings were all accidental?This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
How was the intent determined or even being discussed before the black boxes were recovered and without any foreign countries yet involved on the ground??
IMO it seems the govt wants a certain message to play out.
Sounds like victim blaming if you ask me. Is it the ladies fault when she gets raped? Is it our fault for owning nice things for thieves to steal??This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think your analogy works the other way. It isn't like Iran would have had their SAM defenses armed if the US hadn't bombed them. So in this case wouldn't Iran be the woman and the US be the rapist?This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Cos...
look at it how you wish.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
We have already been told it was an accident so all will be forgiven and canada will have lost all those lives for what??
A few days from now most canadians wont care.
There's nothing anyone can say to make those families whole again. The people didn't die for a cause, and their deaths couldn't be avenged in any satisfying manner no matter what Canada's response is. There is literally nothing Canada can do to help those grieving families.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
not jumping to the defense of Iran would have been a good start.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The craziest part is it came from the spouse of one of the most senior government officials in our country. Who needs enemies when this is how you treat your allies.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Trump is shortsighted and would have never foreseen this. Both Obama and Bush had the same button and option and decided not to push it.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The problem with blames is, do you go as far as whole Trump Ukraine scandal that led to his impeachment which led to him acting out to avoid it which end with the death of Canadians?
Trumps numbers did take a hit after this week tho, if polls to be believed. Impeachment actually improved his numbers but he had to go fuck it up.
Last edited by Xtrema; 01-10-2020 at 10:56 AM.
Interesting that he's married to catherine mckenna, but i don't see how that matters. It's not like this opinion article now becomes some sort of official position of Canada just because he's married to a cabinet member.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hell look at george conway who is married to kelly-anne conway (one of trump's senior advisors) - he is one of trump's biggest critics but it really doesn't matter in the grande scheme.
More on the shootdown theory.
Matches up with this photo.
As in the Malaysian MH17 shootdown the missle didn't have to directly strike the Ukrainian airliner-just explode near it so the nose cone could have survived the explosion.
Video of the crash-as per the Youtube uploader.
Fair point.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I'm curious about this and I have heard about it before. Do most anti aircraft missiles work like that? It certainly makes more sense to blow once the system determines that it's close enough than to detonate upon impact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Yes, and a lot of missiles in general work like that, as do bombs, depending on the specific application. For example an atomic bomb / nuke is way more effective if detonated pretty far above the surface.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Why the missle head is found intact. Shape charge around SRB pushing shrapnel outwards into a large ring. Like a big ass shotgun blast so you only need to get close not right in contact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Seems to be fairly standard.
Yes, these aren't harpoons they are shooting.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Right? I've been having this argument with other people.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The hell does Iran have to gain shooting down a passenger airliner and killing its own people?