That car doesn't have a RIGHT TO LIVE! I have to blast it dead .. there, it's dead..
It's such a bizarre concept I think. Super large, heavy super strong car that is quite fast, and quite comfortable, but what the hell, gonna go on the track with such a thing costing that much? Then the performance feels wasted, and a SL500 or whatever they are called would be far more comfortable and practical. I'm sure you know what I am talking about.
EDIT: My latest post in this thread, it makes it easier to get into the argument.
---------------------------
Lets explore the implications of mixing performance and luxury into a single vehicle instead of two seperate more dedicated ones. I am not an expert, I just thought of these after thinking for a while about the issue. I am sorry if I made it hard to read and didn't sort it thoroughly. Feel free to add to the lists, and add overall comments.
I am aware that certain things about performance and convinience do reinforce each other, such as very light suspension parts = low unsprung weight, higher chance of avoiding accidents bla bla, but on the other hand, performance only helps that much in traffic, and that can be attained in low level cars such as the Subaru Legacy and Ford Contour for example.
Positive:
1. Requires less transportations (no need for switching)
2. Can race damned fast (i.e. breaking the law) on public roads. Wether or not this is a positive thing is subjective.
3. Requires half the garage/storage space.
4. Racing will be more comfortable (allthough comfort will make it perform worse).
5. Social Tool value is usually higher.
Negative:
1. Safety devices desired for peformance racing are undesirable in a comfort car. This applies if one intends to actually use the performance in a legal way and not race around in traffic (this performance is nearly useless in cities more or less). Thus safety is compromised.
2. Luxury elements in a comfort car are not desirable in a performance car. Such as automatic transmission, large ammounts of sound deadening compounds, Air Conditioning, double-layered windows, several powered items, sun/moonroof, back-seats, suspension tuning for tolerable rides (I am aware of the variable suspension of the E55AMG but I suspect this is more prone to damage and has more mass), overassisted steering, even the long wheelbase required to fit a comfortably sized trunk and rear seat - will harm center of gravity, weight distribution, etc. In other words, these elements counter-act performance.
3. Wear and tear (tyres, brakes, engine) from the two aspects (driving and racing) will both add up. Repairs to either will prevent usage of the other.
4. Certain components will require switching for more of the desired utility/performance. I.e. slicks, softer race compounds, studded winter tyres and what else. This is extra labour.
5. Damage resulting from either performance or just a normal accident will inevitably affect the other. Therefore one puts the other element at risk (like putting the family's car on risk needlessly when going to race on the track) whenever using either element.
6. Fuel economy, emission levels, maintenance frequency and costs, theft and vandalism risks, insurance premiums; will all become worse.
7. Performance car traits such as mid mounted engine, aerodynamic aids, low seating position, are undesirable on convinience cars.