Quantcast
handling 17"-->15" - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: handling 17"-->15"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,077
    Rep Power
    24

    Default handling 17"-->15"

    will I be seeing big handling differences (and positive or negative!) going from

    17" rims, 225/45/17

    to

    15" rims, 205/50/15

    (assuming I'm going for a better tire...from continental contisport to either falken azenis or kuhmo ecsta supra 712)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    CSpot
    My Ride
    11 sec weather van
    Posts
    720
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    yup, its gonna suck in the corners compared to the 17's. I saw an article where a guy picked up 6 mph in the corners(no idea what course) from going from 16's to 17's. Thats condisderable..
    Ford tuning guy...

    I have too much respect for the idea of God to make it responsible for such an absurd world.
    Georges Duhamel

    joke of the day:
    Originally posted by Danger_Mouse
    There is a replacement for displacement. It's called technology.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Edmonton
    My Ride
    2001 Jetta 1.8T
    Posts
    49
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I know the conventional wisdom is bigger=better, but in the autocross world, everything I've read indicates go for the smallest wheel and tires you can.

    I don't fully understand it myself. I know its partly to reduce unsprung weight and rotational momentum of the wheels/tires. This is good for acceleration/braking.

    I guess going with the smallest tire you can will reduce the amount of sidewall so I guess that also regains some of the benefits of a larger wheel. Of course, you'll also end up with a smaller overall diameter. Something which isn't so bad on the track, but not something you'd want to do for street use.

    I dunno, just trying to pass on/interpret what I've read. I'm sure someone will point out the errors.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    NW
    My Ride
    ACR/EG/FJZ80/DC4/DC2/22RE
    Posts
    2,025
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Will you have problem with clearance? (Such as the caliper)

    Some benefits that I can see:
    Quicker accerleration (Less rotational mass)
    Slowing down will be easier
    Cheaper tires

    If you maintain the overall diameter of the tire
    eg. xxx/65R/xx
    o turn in will be less resposive
    o ride quality will be softer
    o speedometer relativley unchanged

    If Not
    eg xxx/50R/xx
    o speedometer will be off (that also means mileage reported)
    o ride quaility about the same as the 17" or a little harsher
    o turn in responsive increased (or the same as the 17")

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Red Deer
    My Ride
    Pathfinder
    Posts
    1,305
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    I read in SCC a while back where they tested three sizes of rim 15', 16' and a 17' in the same rim with the same tire and they got the fastest 1/4 mile time and lap time with the 16' rim....hope that helps

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    830
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by Speed_Dreams
    I read in SCC a while back where they tested three sizes of rim 15', 16' and a 17' in the same rim with the same tire and they got the fastest 1/4 mile time and lap time with the 16' rim....hope that helps

    that doesnt make a whole lotta sense...but it also depends on the weight of the rim and what size rims came from the factory

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Cow Town
    My Ride
    2013 Acura TSX A-Spec
    Posts
    243
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by MrHeavyFoot
    I know the conventional wisdom is bigger=better, but in the autocross world, everything I've read indicates go for the smallest wheel and tires you can.

    My buddy who is in the bcmr2 club in Vancouver autocrosses and he stuck with 15" when he bought rims. He told me that if the rim is too big, it's not very good for autocrossing. I have no idea why though

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    toyota powered
    Posts
    47
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Actually I think you have to run small rims and Lower profile tires to see the benefit.

    1 - lowering the center of gravity
    2 - better gearing ratio for acceleration
    3 - cheaper tires
    4 - weight saving

    but then check this out

    http://www.grassrootsmotorsports.com/plustest.html

    for the same diameter of tires, 17" runs faster than 15"

    Need some autoX expert in these thing! :P

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Back in Calgary! WOOT
    My Ride
    GD + GR WRB
    Posts
    2,656
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    It just makes sense really,smaller rims have less inertia, less gyroscopic effect, less weight, less unsprung weight, cheaper tires (letting you go with stickier tires for less money) ect ect ect. Even if the rims weigh exactly the same in a 17" as they do in 16", the 16 will still have different (lower) inertial and gyroscopic forces.

    I really feel that anything over 16 will adversly affect all aspects of performance (unless you have absofrikinlutely huge brakes). Big rims sure do look great tho!!
    Bought not built!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Edmonton
    My Ride
    2001 Jetta 1.8T
    Posts
    49
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by midship
    Actually I think you have to run small rims and Lower profile tires to see the benefit.

    1 - lowering the center of gravity
    2 - better gearing ratio for acceleration
    3 - cheaper tires
    4 - weight saving

    but then check this out

    http://www.grassrootsmotorsports.com/plustest.html

    for the same diameter of tires, 17" runs faster than 15"

    Need some autoX expert in these thing! :P
    Good article. I guess it makes sense that the lower sidewalls and wider tires on the 17" provide better handling, where as acceleration and braking would be somewhat compromised due to the weight/rotational mass.

    So the best bang should come with smaller wheels and lower than normal profile tires (and wider). I've gone with a set of 15x7 wheels and 225/50/15 tires for autox this year. Stock is 15x6 and 195/65/16 I think. The overall diameter is slightly less than stock (~5%) so hopefully that will help. I could have gone with 225/45/15 but I wasn't completely comfortable going that small (~10% smaller than stock). Maybe next time.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,077
    Rep Power
    24

    Default


    I dunno, I just don't like that article.

    I know its pretty old, and was a 'cheap' test to do.

    But it doesn't seem very accurate..a lot of subjective things "feels faster"...(I haven't read it in a while) but I think they also had different rim/tire combinations for each size right?

    Does anyone have that Sport Compact Car article where they did the same kinda thing? Except they used a Mitsubishi EVO and a pro driver, who was 'blind' to the set of wheels he was using at each test trial?

    I'd like to read it again, but have lost my issue.

    There's a while EVO on the cover, I think the rest of the cover is kinda peachy or something.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    A shite neighbourhood
    My Ride
    Left at 5pm
    Posts
    1,164
    Rep Power
    44

    Default

    One other benifit of smaller rims:
    It takes less power to drive the wheel, and the wheel actually spins faster, since the rim weighs less, Less horse and torque is required to spin the wheel, and the centrifical force is less. Less power required to actually spin the rim, means more power can get to the ground.

    I was watching HorsepowerTV on TNN once (boring saturday afternoon ) And they had a project Si going, for some reason. And they installed big BlingBling 17's...And when they dyno'd it, the whp output dropped by like, 10 horse...running the exact same setup as before the installation

    Sounds like you've made a good chocie w/ your tires Heavyfoot.
    Originally posted by scat19
    I have a BMW so im not stupid.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Edmonton
    My Ride
    2001 Jetta 1.8T
    Posts
    49
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by XylathaneGTR

    Sounds like you've made a good chocie w/ your tires Heavyfoot.
    "Times" will tell

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    107
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Well, rally cars run huge rims, for stiffness sakes

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    oreo cookie
    My Ride
    a wrx.
    Posts
    8,031
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    Originally posted by XylathaneGTR
    centrifical force
    no such thing.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,077
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    no such thing.
    There is in Jr High!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    toyota powered
    Posts
    47
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by szw



    I dunno, I just don't like that article.

    I know its pretty old, and was a 'cheap' test to do.

    But it doesn't seem very accurate..a lot of subjective things "feels faster"...(I haven't read it in a while) but I think they also had different rim/tire combinations for each size right?

    Same tires and rims combination. Only different is the 14", cos the tire was not available in that size. IMO grassrootmotorsport test much more reliable than SCC test. Just my 2 cents.

Similar Threads

  1. Handling with rims

    By 2.2vtec in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 9
    Latest Threads: 01-05-2003, 05:33 AM
  2. Mikko's AMG Handling Debate

    By Mikko in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 76
    Latest Threads: 12-13-2002, 08:04 PM
  3. "FOR SALE" Competition Box and two 12" subs

    By moose_8 in forum Miscellaneous Buy/Sell/Trade
    Replies: 15
    Latest Threads: 12-04-2002, 05:09 PM
  4. One way for the SLK to "kill" those fast S/C'd "328s"

    By kenny in forum Cars, Bikes, Machines
    Replies: 37
    Latest Threads: 11-01-2002, 11:12 AM
  5. Poser SLK 320 "AMG" vs Arbour Lake Yellow CRX

    By rage2 in forum Street Encounters
    Replies: 19
    Latest Threads: 05-27-2002, 02:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •