Quantcast
Acura, Kia, Volvo best in crash test, BMW worst - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Acura, Kia, Volvo best in crash test, BMW worst

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    My Ride
    I like. :)
    Posts
    1,639
    Rep Power
    23

    Exclamation Acura, Kia, Volvo best in crash test, BMW worst

    Acura, Kia, Volvo best in crash test, BMW worst

    DEE-ANN DURBIN
    Associated Press

    DETROIT – The 2008 BMW 5 Series was the worst performer in new side-impact crash tests of luxury sedans by the insurance industry.

    The Acura RL, Kia Amanti and Volvo S80 all earned the highest safety rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, according to results released today. The Cadillac STS and Mercedes E-Class earned the second-highest rating.

    The tests were designed to show what would happen if a truck or sport utility vehicle hit the side of the sedan at 31 mph, the speed of a serious crash. Side-impact crashes are the most common type of fatal crash after a frontal crash, killing around 9,000 people in 2005, the institute said.

    "Growing sales of SUVs and pickups have exacerbated height mismatches among passenger vehicles, thereby increasing the risks to occupants of many vehicles struck in the side," Insurance Institute President Adrian Lund said in a news release.

    All six sedans were equipped with standard side air bags. The air bags in the BMW 5 Series protected the head, but separate air bags designed to protect the chest and abdomen performed poorly, the institute said.

    BMW spokesman Thomas Plucinsky said the institute's test indicated the 5 Series has a strong body structure but the dummy was injured when it was hit by the arm rest. Plucinsky said BMW does up to 12 crash tests on all its cars as well as computer simulations of crashes.

    "The issue is that depending on the location of seat, the location of dummy, the location of the sled, the results could change," he said. "This was one test on one day on one car.''

    The Kia Amanti was one of the lowest priced sedans in the group, with a starting price of around $25,500 (U.S.), but it offered more protection than more expensive entries. The BMW 5 Series starts at $43,500, while the Mercedes E-Class starts at $50,550, according to Edmunds.com.

    "The Amanti shows that you don't have to buy an expensive car to get good protection in crashes with SUVs and pickups," Lund said.

    The Volvo S80 also won the institute's top safety award for overall crash protection, since it got the highest ratings in front, side and rear crash tests and has electronic stability control as standard equipment. Stability control helps prevent rollovers.

    All of the sedans tested were 2007 models except the 5 Series, which was redesigned for 2008, institute spokesman Russ Rader said.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Calgary/Helsinki
    My Ride
    GTI
    Posts
    3,823
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    X2. The other closed one is only a couple threads down, so I won't bother providing a link.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    19 Jeep Wrangler, 20 Hyundai Palisade
    Posts
    5,045
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    Ironic that the safest ones are the cars no one gives a crap about

Similar Threads

  1. BMW 5 series worst in side impact crash test

    By rage2 in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 8
    Latest Threads: 08-19-2007, 08:32 AM
  2. Chinese SUV scores worst ever crash results

    By habsfan in forum Automotive News
    Replies: 78
    Latest Threads: 10-17-2005, 04:19 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Latest Threads: 10-19-2004, 08:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •