Quantcast
Which car would you picK? - Page 3 - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 132

Thread: Which car would you picK?

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Chinatown
    My Ride
    FJC, S30
    Posts
    2,375
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    my cuzin has a nsx and i love it.. its beautiful
    Submaker.Illest.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    C-Spot
    My Ride
    11sec S14, Lux Family Bus, VQ35HR
    Posts
    2,689
    Rep Power
    47

    Default

    Fastest documented supra i've read/seen 850 hp, 1000+ hp not un heard of. Fastest documented NSX i've read/seen 550 hp (MUGEN NSX GT1 race version). The this is a one sided argument. I'm a nissan guy and I still say Supra, toss a skyline in there, and it'll be one sided again but with Godzilla on top!
    Quote Originally Posted by Yolobimmer View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    She wishes it was deep.
    Quote Originally Posted by rage2 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So deep put her ass to sleep.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    740
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Doesn't the Top Secret Supra have over 1000 HP?
    I know you don't smoke weed. I know this. But I'm gonna git you high today. 'cause it's Friday, you ain't got no job, and you ain't got shit to do!

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    2019 RS3, Corolla winter beater
    Posts
    278
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Originally posted by DonJuan
    Fastest documented supra i've read/seen 850 hp, 1000+ hp not un heard of. Fastest documented NSX i've read/seen 550 hp (MUGEN NSX GT1 race version). The this is a one sided argument. I'm a nissan guy and I still say Supra, toss a skyline in there, and it'll be one sided again but with Godzilla on top!
    It's too bad the last Skyline GT-R never made it here in LHD format... if so, then I would also seriously consider it. Now that would have made the decision so much tougher. Man I love variety and competition! Just wondering what the next gen one will be like? Will it retain the awd, twin turbo and inline 6 platform? Only time will tell...

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    F10M/F87/NA2/W220/V90/E46ZHP/SE3P/DC2
    Posts
    6,173
    Rep Power
    50

    Default

    Originally posted by Dope Dealer
    Doesn't the Top Secret Supra have over 1000 HP?

    ya but im pretty sure that its skyline powered. (RB)

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    1,039
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Re: Re: Re: Which car would you picK?

    Originally posted by Moonracer


    Looks like TF&TF part one had a huge influence on everyone here. And why shouldn't the supra be on the same list as the rest of these cars??? Every one of these cars have a lot of potential for tuning, the supra is becoming overrated and it's no better than most of these. But don't get me wrong it certainly is a great car and all but as I said....
    Anyway the NSX for me of course!
    your an idiot, dont you ever talk down to me again you fucking newb... i also suggest you pull your head out of your ass and do some research on the supra...


    Professional DJ equipment for sale: Click Here

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    calcurry
    Posts
    294
    Rep Power
    22

    Default Re: Re: Which car would you picK?

    Originally posted by Wildcat


    dude... supra, it shouldnt even be in the same list as these other cars...

    94-95 Supra TT -best platform ever... that is all
    91-95 300ZX -overated
    93-95 RX7 TT -problematic
    92-95 Stealth TT or VR4 -i like em... its got my vote for 2nd place..
    97-98 Eclipse AWD T -another awesome platform, but its chump change next to the supra...
    91-92 Acura NSX - way too underpowered for a "supercar"
    are you kidding me?
    although the rx-7's are quirky they ARE in the same league as the supra.
    I guess your camaro (or SS camaro's) is leagues below a c5 then too right?
    Last edited by Joe Malms; 06-28-2003 at 02:10 AM.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    1,039
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Re: Re: Re: Which car would you picK?

    Originally posted by Joe Malms


    are you kidding me?
    although the rx-7's are quirky they ARE in the same league as the supra.
    I guess your camaro (or SS camaro's) is leagues below a c5 then too right?
    when was the last time youve seen an +800 rwhp street legal Rx7?

    yes the camaro is in a league below the corvette... first of all its a 4 seater muscle car and the corvette is a 2 seater sports car... are you trying to prove a point here or....


    Professional DJ equipment for sale: Click Here

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    calcurry
    Posts
    294
    Rep Power
    22

    Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Which car would you picK?

    Originally posted by Wildcat


    when was the last time youve seen an +800 rwhp street legal Rx7?

    yes the camaro is in a league below the corvette... first of all its a 4 seater muscle car and the corvette is a 2 seater sports car... are you trying to prove a point here or....
    Interesting comment on the camaro being a 4 seater muscle car and the vette being a 2 seater sports car.
    Did you happen to know the supra is a 4 seater car and the rx-7 is a 2 seater?
    Not the strongest arguement

    For one thing, the rx-7 is a nice 600lbs lighter.
    One of the reasons it can't make as much power is the engine is simply smaller.

    Don't get me wrong, i'd own a supra if i could and yes, the engine is amazing. Seeing as you're probably into drag racing (judging by your only argument being HP) the rx-7 can go pretty fast too.

    Have you ever driven any of the cars on that list?
    I doubt it. Probably just reading a bunch of internet forums right?
    No im not psychic.

    I'd rank the NSX with the rx-7 and supra as well if it wasnt so overpriced.
    Last edited by Joe Malms; 06-28-2003 at 08:46 AM.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    1,039
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which car would you picK?

    Interesting comment on the camaro being a 2 seater muscle car and the vette being a 2 seater sports car.

    probly just a typo but it doesnt stray far from your lines of stupidity...

    Did you happen to know the supra is a 4 seater car and the rx-7 is a 2 seater?
    Not the strongest arguement

    ya i noticed.... the 4 seater licks the 2 seater every time...

    For one thing, the rx-7 is a nice 600lbs lighter.

    does it matter? put your mom in the rx7 with ya and we'll call it even...

    One of the reasons it can't make as much power is the engine is simply smaller.

    excuses excuses...

    Don't get me wrong, i'd own a supra if i could and yes, the engine is amazing. Seeing as you're probably into drag racing (judging by your only argument being HP) the rx-7 can go pretty fast too.

    but never as fast, the supra was a freak of nature unleashed by toyota due to millions upon millions of R&D.... mazda Rx7... simply a car that did not sell...

    Have you ever driven any of the cars on that list?

    no, but im sure your friends uncles cousin has...

    I doubt it. Probably just reading a bunch of internet forums right?
    No im not psychic.

    psychic no; fag yes

    I'd rank the NSX with the rx-7 and supra as well if it wasnt so overpriced.

    only smart thing you have said, i agree im not a fan of the NSX either..


    Professional DJ equipment for sale: Click Here

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    2,008
    Rep Power
    24

    Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Which car would you picK?

    Originally posted by Wildcat


    your an idiot, dont you ever talk down to me again you fucking newb... i also suggest you pull your head out of your ass and do some research on the supra...
    Grow up! My god..... You seem pretty insecure.
    Last edited by Moonracer; 06-28-2003 at 07:08 AM.

  12. #52
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    calcurry
    Posts
    294
    Rep Power
    22

    Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which car would you picK?

    Originally posted by Wildcat
    Interesting comment on the camaro being a 2 seater muscle car and the vette being a 2 seater sports car.

    probly just a typo but it doesnt stray far from your lines of stupidity...

    Did you happen to know the supra is a 4 seater car and the rx-7 is a 2 seater?
    Not the strongest arguement

    ya i noticed.... the 4 seater licks the 2 seater every time...

    For one thing, the rx-7 is a nice 600lbs lighter.

    does it matter? put your mom in the rx7 with ya and we'll call it even...

    One of the reasons it can't make as much power is the engine is simply smaller.

    excuses excuses...

    Don't get me wrong, i'd own a supra if i could and yes, the engine is amazing. Seeing as you're probably into drag racing (judging by your only argument being HP) the rx-7 can go pretty fast too.

    but never as fast, the supra was a freak of nature unleashed by toyota due to millions upon millions of R&D.... mazda Rx7... simply a car that did not sell...

    Have you ever driven any of the cars on that list?

    no, but im sure your friends uncles cousin has...

    I doubt it. Probably just reading a bunch of internet forums right?
    No im not psychic.

    psychic no; fag yes

    I'd rank the NSX with the rx-7 and supra as well if it wasnt so overpriced.

    only smart thing you have said, i agree im not a fan of the NSX either..
    I gave some valid points whereas you simply tried to insult me?
    Nice.
    Be sure who you're talking to before you make assumptions decide get personal.
    Last edited by Joe Malms; 06-28-2003 at 08:49 AM.

  13. #53
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    1,039
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which car would you picK?

    Originally posted by Joe Malms


    I gave some valid points whereas you simply tried to insult me?
    Nice.
    Be sure who you're talking to before you make assumptions decide get personal.
    not once were your points valid... if they were, i wouldnt be arguing with you in the first place...


    Professional DJ equipment for sale: Click Here

  14. #54
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    95 TSi AWD, 05 300C
    Posts
    379
    Rep Power
    101

    Default Re: Re: Which car would you picK?

    Originally posted by E36M3

    4th Place 97-98 Eclipse AWD T

    Pretty fun for a FWD biased car.
    FWD biased?....how's that?

  15. #55
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    95 TSi AWD, 05 300C
    Posts
    379
    Rep Power
    101

    Default

    1. Supra - massive potential
    2. Eclipse - large potential (AWD rocks)
    3. 300ZX - nice car, quite a bit you can do to it, quite expensive tho
    4. Stealth - sweet-ass car, with potential, but heavy
    5. NSX - nice car, good reliability, but really not that impressive to drive, and really not worth what you'll end up paying for it
    6. RX7 - overrated :P

  16. #56
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    York
    My Ride
    1989 Ford Mustang
    Posts
    107
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Supra.

    The HKS Drag Supra piloted by Tetsuya Kawasaki ran its fastest 1/4 mile time ever and also delivered its highest trap speed at the NHRA Sport Compact Series Drag Race held at Old Bridge Township Raceway Park, Englishtown, NJ.

    The Supra during shake-downs ran a 7.296 ET with a trap speed of 166.95 MPH. With a good feel for track conditions the HKS crew decided to go for it all and Kawasaki delivered a 6.956 ET at 199.37 MPH, and then backed it up with a tremendous pass running 6.893 at 193.13 MPH. The HKS Drag Supra's run of 6.893 eclipsed its previous best 1/4 mile ET of 7.277 posted at Sendai Highland Drag Raceway, Japan.
    Last edited by STI-Guy; 06-28-2003 at 03:44 PM.
    -Rob, Wannabe Director
    1987 Ford Mustang 2.3L Turbo


  17. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    York
    My Ride
    1989 Ford Mustang
    Posts
    107
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Sorry, forgot the pic.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    -Rob, Wannabe Director
    1987 Ford Mustang 2.3L Turbo


  18. #58
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    830
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    i dont care what you say that the nsx isnt as "fast" but the rest of the cars in that list do not even compare to it IMO

  19. #59
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    94 VW Golf
    Posts
    214
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    that supra above doesnt even have a toyota engine in it i bet......its prob a V8 in other words thats not even a supra

    every thing that wildcat sayed is true.....and if i where to pic what car to have it would be the nsx(i will sell it and buy a camaro and put the rest of the money in to the engine.....lets see any HONDIY match that)

    yo buddy dont spend any of your money on thoses cars go buy a camaro

  20. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    York
    My Ride
    1989 Ford Mustang
    Posts
    107
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by redec
    6. RX7 - overrated :P
    How so?

    The RX7 is one of the most legendary cars to ever be produced in Japan with multiple GT car championship titles among other countless other titles to prove it.

    - IMSA record holder = MAZDA
    - Over 100 victories in the 20 years of IMSA
    - Porsche was second with 55 victories
    - 11 year winning streak = MAZDA

    We can go on and on.

    http://me.a-spec.ca:6112/a/Mazda/Maz...-RX-7-0018.JPG

    Originally posted by Wildcat
    when was the last time youve seen an +800 rwhp street legal Rx7?
    Your ignorance is apalling. The RX7 doesn't need big HP numbers to get low ETs. A 350rwhp RX7 will WALK a 350rwhp Supra decisively.

    50/50 weight distrubition as well as a 2700lbs chassis more than compinsate for the HP. You need to take your own advice and quit talking out of your ass. You haven't the slightest clue of what you are talking about.
    -Rob, Wannabe Director
    1987 Ford Mustang 2.3L Turbo


Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Which car would you buy?

    By Daxin in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 37
    Latest Threads: 05-05-2003, 06:58 PM
  2. Which car would you rather own?

    By Ekliptix in forum Cars, Bikes, Machines
    Replies: 29
    Latest Threads: 03-21-2003, 11:16 AM
  3. Which car would you buy if you had the money?

    By SilverRex in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 40
    Latest Threads: 11-15-2002, 12:35 AM
  4. which would you rather have??

    By infamous in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 18
    Latest Threads: 10-29-2002, 07:27 PM
  5. which would you take??

    By infamous in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 40
    Latest Threads: 09-01-2002, 01:58 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •