I bought a non DX Sigma 28-200 (42-300 effective).
So I don't need the Nikon.
I bought a non DX Sigma 28-200 (42-300 effective).
So I don't need the Nikon.
Last edited by lewdvig; 01-10-2009 at 02:15 PM.
Less than new.
I figure there are enough eyeballs on this site that someone might spot a deal.
Or, someone might be moving up to FX and have one to sell (although I think Nikon FX bodies are smart enough to use DX lenses without chopping the corners.
Lenses hold their value, but you never know.
True that is a much cheaper route but you can't beat the 18-200 for size (weight less than both lenses and takes up less room) and you don't have to keep switching lens which is quite annoying.Originally posted by C4S
Anyway, if you are buying 18-200 ...
I may suggest u to get 18-55 (VR or not, no big deal) + 55-200VR.
Much, Cheaper, and same or better PQ.