Lovely Mary Jimenez

[bubbley]

Original Post Removed. (Please read the Forum Rules and Terms of Use before posting again, or risk getting banned).

[R154]

How is breaking the law not being a criminal? Does it offend you that you are yourself a criminal?

I have broken then law. So that makes me a criminal. It is a clear as that.

[Eleanor]

Originally posted by R154
I have broken then law. So that makes me a criminal. It is a clear as that.

Not quite. Speeding isn't a "crime" as defined by the Criminal Code of Canada. It's breaking the law, but not committing a crime.

[R154]

Tomato, Tomatoe.

[gatorade]

Originally posted by R154
How is breaking the law not being a criminal? Does it offend you that you are yourself a criminal?

I have broken then law. So that makes me a criminal. It is a clear as that.

by that logic everybody is a criminal, sometimes laws are not based on whats right and wrong, its based on what those in power think is right and wrong, in california medical marijuana is legal but according to state law its illegal, does that make people using medical marijuana criminals even though they are actually following the law?

[bubbley]

anways i have copyrighted her name and will produce pancake syrup

but she got screwed..im sure she was just there at the wrong time and got taken down with her gangster bf...sucks....but cops can go around charging whoever the hell they want blindly doesnt mean crap...judge has the final say...im sure they will drop hers with a decent lawyer and possibly go against her bf in this case to get out of this mess...strategy by cops

edit:
did she no her bf was up to no good and the guns and prob a whole bunch of other juicy info? HELL YA
was she a gangster herself or doing crimes? PROB NOT

[01RedDX]

.

[R154]

Originally posted by gatorade


by that logic everybody is a criminal, sometimes laws are not based on whats right and wrong, its based on what those in power think is right and wrong, in california medical marijuana is legal but according to state law its illegal, does that make people using medical marijuana criminals even though they are actually following the law?

Technically, YES. That was the point I was making. In the grand scheme of punishment VS crime. We need to adjust our punishments.

[R154]

Originally posted by 01RedDX


Because not everything is a criminal code violation.

For the record I was going to defend your other position on repeat offenders but now I won't because you called me a criminal.

Are you less offended, that I called myself a criminal too?

It has been well established, that I cant actually call you a criminal, as I was wrong. If it is not an offense you can go to jail for, then you cant be a criminal. However you can be convicted for breaching any clause of the motor vehicle act.

I retract my labeling of you reddx. However, that doesnt make my previous positions any less valid. Thank you for the comment either way.

[berbatov]

Original Post Removed. (Please read the Forum Rules and Terms of Use before posting again, or risk getting banned).

[01RedDX]

.

[TKRIS]

Originally posted by R154
I will admit my statement about [people who go to jail become apathetic towards johny law] as being more of a sentiment then fact. You have done little to debunk my sentiment, however. Regardless of its insinuation, or implication, is it not true that someone who is in jail becomes even less concerned with his future with regard to punishment?

So now that's we've established that your statement is pure speculation, pulled directly from your ass, with no basis in reality, you demand that I refute it?
Haha.

Originally posted by R154
I resent your ad hominem remarks towards me.

I resent you posting stupid shit. And for the record, I've made no Ad Hominem attacks.

Ad Hominem would be if I'd tried to call you stupid to prove your statements were incorrect.
I proved your statements were incorrect, and used that as a basis to declare you stupid. There's a big difference.


But don't get all riled up. It's just the internet. I'm sure you're a fine, upstanding, god fearing, not-stupid, young man.

Originally posted by R154
Instead of expanding your point you reverted to argumentative tactics

Actually, I've expanded my point to comical extents. Had you, instead of immediately getting your panties in a twist after my first post, taken a moment to reread what you'd written and considered what a post hoc argument is, I'm sure you would have realized that I was right from "go", and we'd have saved ourselves a half dozen posts of me trying to explain it to you.

Originally posted by R154
that may fly with casual beyond keyboard jockies,

Aren't we superior. haha

Originally posted by R154
however I would appreciate it if you didnt try to dumb me down and drag our discussion down to that level.

I respect you as a poster enough not to do the same to you. Share that courtesy.

Think before you post, and I've got nothing to say.
You don't get to blame me for you being wrong just because you took exception to the language in my rebuttal.

[[GaGe]]

Originally posted by berbatov

You were straight at 17, right ?

[R154]

/im out your arrogance is astouding.

[G-Suede]

Original Post Removed. (Please read the Forum Rules and Terms of Use before posting again, or risk getting banned).

[D. Dub]

Originally posted by Rocky


You can be a great person and all but if you surround yourself with these types it says something about your personality. If you're the significant other of somebody who's got weapons and guns in a home, it's not like you don't know what they're doing -- hell, you probably have an active role in it too (whether that be supporting or doing it yourself).

Originally posted by G-Suede
Whatever, get over it. She was arrested and charged with 40 weapons related offenses. The old saying "You reap what you sow." comes to mind.

I like the saying "water sinks to it's own level".

[thinmyster]

Original Post Removed. (Please read the Forum Rules and Terms of Use before posting again, or risk getting banned).

[method]

LOL few people on this forum feeling guilty by association?

[max_boost]

Don't bother arguing with TKRIS. No chance. lol

[TKRIS]

Originally posted by R154
/im out your arrogance is astouding.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but that actually is an Ad Hominem attack. You're trying to use a personal attack on my character to dismiss my point.