WTB: Canon 24-70

[The_Rural_Juror]

Don't need it anymore

[dogstar]

Might want to look into the Tamron 28-75 F2.8.
80% of the Canon's performance for 50% of the cost.

[The_Rural_Juror]

Originally posted by dogstar
Might want to look into the Tamron 28-75 F2.8.
80% of the Canon's performance for 50% of the cost.

thanks but those suck for panos.

[dogstar]

Panos suck, so it's all good.

No offence, but you can take good panos with a point n shoot and a spherical tripod head. http://gregwired.com/pano/Pano.htm

Most important thing you'll ever read about photography, if you haven't read through this yet, you really should.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm

[The_Rural_Juror]

Originally posted by dogstar
Panos suck, so it's all good.

No offence, but you can take good panos with a point n shoot and a spherical tripod head. http://gregwired.com/pano/Pano.htm

[/url]

That's blasphemy.

89coupe says that panos are the hardest things to shoot, and everything else takes no skill at all.

I bite my thumb at you.

[AccentAE86]

What do you think one is worth? I passively have one for sale. Having both the 24-105 and 17-55, the 24-70 has hardly been used at all so I probably wouldn't miss it.

Unless you have a nikon 24-70 to trade; I'd go for that.

[The_Rural_Juror]

urgg...if only I saw this earlier.