I am used to residential drawings in imperial measurements and I don't understand the graph/drawing in the bottom left of this document: http://saanich.ca/webapp/vso/display...=q10909_03.pdf
Anyone want to help? Thanks!
I am used to residential drawings in imperial measurements and I don't understand the graph/drawing in the bottom left of this document: http://saanich.ca/webapp/vso/display...=q10909_03.pdf
Anyone want to help? Thanks!
Do you mean the wall profile on the top left of the drawing if you look at it the right way?
If you're in Victoria before Friday give me a call, I'll sort it out for you.
Originally posted by FraserB
I think their main complaint is that they did not receive the stolen property they paid for.
Yes, that is what I am referring to ("Top of Wall Profile"). I know this is fairly basic, I just need a couple of pointers to help me decipher this. Thanks.Originally posted by lilmira
Do you mean the wall profile on the top left of the drawing if you look at it the right way?
I am all over the place, Salt Spring Island, up island and Victoria. This tender is due on Monday, so time is of the essenceOriginally posted by 97'Scort
If you're in Victoria before Friday give me a call, I'll sort it out for you.![]()
I am hoping to get this done tomorrow. I already have a good idea on price, this is the only part of the estimate I am not quite understanding
From what I can read on the graph, the 0+ 00.000, 0+05.00 etc is the length of the wall. So 0+05.00 is the 5 meter mark of the wall and the number right below it is the elevation at that mark. By elevation, it's usually in reference to something like sea level. In this case, for example (assuming it's from Vancouver Island) the elevation markers show this project at approximately 55-56 +/- meters above sea level.
Last edited by frozenrice; 11-05-2009 at 12:31 AM.
Calgary is so much like an iphone: iCalgary - There's a bylaw for that.
That seems needlessly complicated...
Ok, thanks. The elevations were throwing me off, because this wall has an average height of 1.5 metersOriginally posted by frozenrice
From what I can read on the graph, the 0+ 00.000, 0+05.00 etc is the length of the wall. So 0+05.00 is the 5 meter mark of the wall and the number right below it is the elevation at that mark. By elevation, it's usually in reference to something like sea level. In this case, for example (assuming it's from Vancouver Island) the elevation markers show this project at approximately 55-56 +/- meters above sea level.
haha, I know, welcome to city contracts...Originally posted by Antonito
That seems needlessly complicated...
1.5 meters sounds about right if you count the portion of the wall below grade. Good luck with the tender.Originally posted by sxtasy
Ok, thanks. The elevations were throwing me off, because this wall has an average height of 1.5 meters
![]()
Calgary is so much like an iphone: iCalgary - There's a bylaw for that.
thanks frozenrice. I have never used sea level as a building reference before.
What about the tide, thats got to be +/- at least 1 meter lol.
Anyways, I've got to stop surfing beyond and get back to this dam estimate lol.
0 or 100,000 is usually at grade. There's got to be a bench mark or two somewhere for construction.
Sta - station in metres
Elev- well, elevation in metres
It looks like you have over a metre of fill.
It looks like the elevations reference mean Sea Level but are usually denoted ASL but that does not mean they have not taken some random local datum.
^^^both comments are correct. I was just using sea level as an example. Now that I think about it the word benchmark rings a bell - couldn't think of the term yesterday.
Calgary is so much like an iphone: iCalgary - There's a bylaw for that.