Apollo 11 Saturn V Launch - "30 seconds in 8 minutes"

[dr_dreidel]

lol at the idea of US vs USSR
both countries are controlled by the same zionist overlords

[Pollywog]

Originally posted by dr_dreidel
lol at the idea of US vs USSR
both countries are controlled by the same zionist overlords

[scat19]

I also have a hard time believing that the landing was real.

There is so much evidence against it. Like stamped prop numbers on props in the photo's!

But, just like you people who don't think out of the box also believe that two towers imploded due to a plane that hit the top.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm

[TomK]

Originally posted by GoChris
It does seem odd, that not too long ago when they were talking about going back, how it would cost hundreds of millions, if not a billion or more dollars to send someone back to the moon. Makes it seem like it is so much harder to do it now than 40 years ago.

40 years ago health care was easily affordable to most US citizens and 10 years ago business men took transatlantic flights on supersonic jets.

Civilizations go into decline sometimes.

[BerserkerCatSplat]

Originally posted by scat19
I also have a hard time believing that the landing was real.

That doesn't really surprise me.

[TKRIS]

[Spoons]

Originally posted by msommers
I smell backpedaling. I think you know who you are!

Nah, just people who only read half my posts. Nice try though.

Pollywog clearly didn't read a bit of the last post. I was stirring the pot... You guys quickly jump on something and go to town on it, so I took advantage of that.

[Pollywog]

Bullshit.

[Spoons]

Originally posted by Pollywog
Bullshit.

Ooooooh you got me!

[Pollywog]

Oh, couldn't you tell? That was also sarcasm.

[01RedDX]

.

[44mot]

Originally posted by Spoons
Again, we can't even manage to successfully launch rockets to this day everytime. Our best insulation at the time was ethspestis (spelling?).

Like I said I don't completely believe it was fake, and yes there is evidence that it was (and I'm not talking about the photograph bullshit, etc.). Some things just don't add up, so if I was to be logical, I can not rule out that it wasn't fake. Yes it would be a huge conspiracy to cover up, but completely possible to do so.

CUG here; you sound like a fool.



You must just be trolling. Good work lol.

[Spoons]

Originally posted by Pollywog
Oh, couldn't you tell? That was also sarcasm.

But you didn't use the rolly eyes smiley how was I supposed to know?

And thanks CUG

[broken_legs]

Originally posted by scat19
I also have a hard time believing that the landing was real.

There is so much evidence against it. Like stamped prop numbers on props in the photo's!

But, just like you people who don't think out of the box also believe that two towers imploded due to a plane that hit the top.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm

Here's some of that "Evidence" from your link:

1. Apollo 14 astronaut Allen Shepard played golf on the Moon. In front of a worldwide TV audience, Mission Control teased him about slicing the ball to the right. Yet a slice is caused by uneven air flow over the ball. The Moon has no atmosphere and no air.
Anyone who golfs knows this is caused by hitting with an open or closed face

2. A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16's Lunar Landerlifting off the Moon. Who did the filming?
Aliens you fuck tard!!!


3. One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is looking up at Neil Armstrong about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have been lying on the planet surface. If Armstrong was the first man on the Moon, then who took the shot?
The whole conspiracy theory hinges on whether or not they had the technology to put a camera on the moon... wow

4. The pressure inside a space suit was greater than inside a football. The astronauts should have been puffed out like the Michelin Man, but were seen freely bending their joints.
Really now... Amazing that people can scuba dive. How come they don't puff up?

5. The Moon landings took place during the Cold War. Why didn't America make a signal on the moon that could be seen from earth? The PR would have been phenomenal and it could have been easily done with magnesium flares.
Best evidence yet.

6. Text from pictures in the article said that only two men walked on the Moon during the Apollo 12 mission. Yet the astronaut reflected in the visor has no camera. Who took the shot?
WTF? The astronaut in the reflection is holding something at his waist (THE CAMERA). Do you think he can hold it up to his eye like a normal camera???

7. The flags shadow goes behind the rock so doesn't match the dark line in the foreground, which looks like a line cord. So the shadow to the lower right of the spaceman must be the flag. Where is his shadow? And why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?
huh?

8. How can the flag be brightly lit when its side is to the light? And where, in all of these shots, are the stars?
Jesus Fuck. On a full moon I can see perfectly fine outside ON EARTH!!!!!!!!! Gee you don't think that some of the light reflecting off THE WHITE MOON would light up that flag do you??

9. The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the astronauts feet seem to have made a bigger dent in the dust. The powerful booster rocket at the base of the Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service. Yet it has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath. It should have created a small crater, yet the booster looks like it's never been fired.
Should have? How much force do you think a jet thruster needs to slow down a slow moving object in 1/6 gravity? How do you know what the ground is made of? Should have? Were you on the set... i mean moon to check? fuck!

Scathing.

Case closed. It was obviously faked. All that evidence is bullet proof.



Seriously, use some common sense. All this moon landing fake evidence is complete bullshit. Critical Thinking FTW.

[derpderp]

lol@this thread.

[atgilchrist]

Back to OP, cool video, great find!

[Eleanor]

Originally posted by Spoons
Still don't believe it was real. We still manage to blow up rockets, have numerous amounts of problems and issues, but in 1969 we managed to get onto the moon?

People living in this city still stop in merge lanes and now you're telling me that we can fly?

Bullshit.

[rob the knob]

scat19 banned?

[Khyron]

Space shuttles were a bad idea and ate 20+ years of time.

Now that they're being retired, we're going back. Theory being the moon will be a refuel stop for any Mars flights.

Strapping shit to the side of a rocket should never have been done.

New launches will be just like the old ones with big ass rockets with modules on top (where it's safer). Equipment will go up on 1 rocket, people on another, meet up in orbit, off to the moon.

I suppose you anti-moon people don't believe any of the Mars probe data either? It's all faked? By a country that couldn't keep a cigar in an intern secret?

[kevie88]

Originally posted by Khyron
Space shuttles were a bad idea and ate 20+ years of time.

Now that they're being retired, we're going back. Theory being the moon will be a refuel stop for any Mars flights.

Strapping shit to the side of a rocket should never have been done.

New launches will be just like the old ones with big ass rockets with modules on top (where it's safer). Equipment will go up on 1 rocket, people on another, meet up in orbit, off to the moon.

I suppose you anti-moon people don't believe any of the Mars probe data either? It's all faked? By a country that couldn't keep a cigar in an intern secret?

Too bad Obama killed the upcoming Moon project

They're going to focus now on long range missions. Planned next step is to land on an asteroid (??) then go on to Mars, using the International Playstation as a rendezvous point.