Quantcast
Council barely approves airport tunnel - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Page 1 of 3 1 2 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 53

Thread: Council barely approves airport tunnel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Left Coast
    My Ride
    Audi
    Posts
    1,348
    Rep Power
    24

    Default Council barely approves airport tunnel

    CALGARY - After delays, rejections and the undaunted advocacy of Mayor Naheed Nenshi, council has approved $295 million to construct a tunnel beneath the new airport runway.

    The decision exacts a bruising toll on city coffers and signals that nearby businesses and the tunnel’s users should help recoup that money.

    The mayor has for years before his election touted the Airport Trail extension as a vital northeast link both for the airport and crosstown traffic. He strove to win the support of colleagues by arguing that the cost of building alternate routes or delaying the project would be even more costly in the long run



    Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Co...#ixzz1DNxf1Mwd
    I would like to have seen the traffic study on barlow north of mcknight that showed exactly how much traffic was actualy going into the airport vs. traffic using barlow as a way to avoid deerfoot.

    Also they're talking about a toll road too. yeah, right, the people I know who live in the NE and would pay a toll to go to the airport is zero considering they will be able to access it from the north end (with the completion of metis trail connecting from 80th to stoney) for an additional few minutes of travel time.

    I don't believe this runs an LRT line to the airport either.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Only 15min from Aspen!
    My Ride
    Nothing interesting anymore
    Posts
    8,422
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    I really don't understand this. People are whining about Barlow being closed, and that access being shut off. So why not just connect Barlow to McCall Way, the tunnel would only be half the size, and serve more people than what the current proposal does. McCall way already exists, so it it would only be a matter of widening it.

    (Green line, my proposal)
    Quote Originally Posted by DonJuan View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Came back to ogle 2Legit2Quit wife's buns...
    Quote Originally Posted by Kloubek View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    They're certainly big, but I don't know if they are the BEST I've tasted.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    X5D, Fiesta ST
    Posts
    7,554
    Rep Power
    57

    Default

    I think Tik-Tok has the right idea here.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    calgary
    My Ride
    WAO Arrival
    Posts
    1,274
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    I just want to drive in a tunnel.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,289
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    .
    Last edited by kaput; 03-22-2019 at 07:01 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    My Ride
    Bicycle
    Posts
    9,278
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Waste of $ IMO, no matter how cheap it is to do it now vs the future.

    It serves nobody except for people in the NE.

    Everyone else will do Deerfoot and Airport Rd. I like Tik Tok's idea better. But I'm pretty sure Airport authority probably wants to claim that space and get rid of roads as well.
    Last edited by Xtrema; 02-08-2011 at 11:00 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    X5D, Fiesta ST
    Posts
    7,554
    Rep Power
    57

    Default

    Although tunnel blasting would be fun.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Only 15min from Aspen!
    My Ride
    Nothing interesting anymore
    Posts
    8,422
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Originally posted by Xtrema
    But I'm pretty sure Airport authority probably wants to claim that space and get rid of roads as well.
    Probably, but another bonus is that it would only be under a taxiway, instead of being under a taxiway AND cruicial runway. If a tunnel were to suddenly collapse, I think I'd rather it collapse under a slow moving airplane, then one at highspeed landing or taking off.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    0
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by Tik-Tok
    I really don't understand this. People are whining about Barlow being closed, and that access being shut off. So why not just connect Barlow to McCall Way, the tunnel would only be half the size, and serve more people than what the current proposal does. McCall way already exists, so it it would only be a matter of widening it.

    (Green line, my proposal)
    McCall Way will not go all the way to the terminal because of the new runway and taxiways being constructed.

    Barlow Trail is in the process of being realigned to connect with McCall Way via a new traffic circle just north of 48th Avenue. Barlow Trail north of there is scheduled to close April 3rd, 2011.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    0
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by Xtrema
    Waste of $ IMO, no matter how cheap it is to do it now vs the future.

    It serves nobody except for people in the NE.

    Everyone else will do Deerfoot and Airport Rd. I like Tik Tok's idea better. But I'm pretty sure Airport authority probably wants to claim that space and get rid of roads as well.
    When the southeast portion of the ring road is completed, it will be faster for the following communities to take the ring road to Airport Trail (which will connect to the ring road) and the tunnel:

    Skyview Ranch, Saddleridge, Martindale, Taradale, Castleridge, Falconridge, Coral Springs, Whitehorn, Temple, Horizon Industrial, Sunridge Industrial, Rundle, Pineridge, Monterey Park, Marlbourough, Marlbourough Park, Abbeydale, Penbrooke, Applewood Park, Large chunks of Foothills Industrial, Copperfield, MacKenzie Towne, MacKenzie Lake, Cranston, Auburn Bay, Mahogany,Chaparral, Silverado, Sundance, Somerset, Bridlewood, Priddis, Okotoks, High River, Nanton, Chestermere, Strathmore, Langdon, Brooks, De Winton, Alderside, Black Diamond, Turner Valley, Irricana, Beiseker, Medicine Hat.

    At slower traffic times on Deerfoot, you could probably add to the list: Evergreen, Shawnessy, Midnapore, Millrise, Douglasdale, Deer Ridge, Deer Run, Parkland, Queensland, and perhaps more.

    The other problem is that the closing of Barlow Trail will add traffic to an already clogged Deerfoot, and that without the tunnel, road upgrades to all the surrounding network (Metis, Country Hills Boulevard (including some needed expropriation), 36th Street, etc.) will still be needed, and that has a greater cost than the tunnel.
    Last edited by frinkprof; 02-08-2011 at 11:27 AM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Only 15min from Aspen!
    My Ride
    Nothing interesting anymore
    Posts
    8,422
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Originally posted by frinkprof
    McCall Way will not go all the way to the terminal because of the new runway and taxiways being constructed.
    Hence why I said...

    the tunnel would only be half the size
    Meaning there would still need to be a tunnel, but it wouldn't need to be as long.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    calgary
    My Ride
    12 camaro ss ,91 aristo , 12 ram
    Posts
    854
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    One of nenshi's priorities was to get the tunnel build. I'm glad he is trying to keep up with his promises.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    .
    My Ride
    .
    Posts
    654
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    I wish people would just say it: They want the tunnel to connect country hills (etc) with 36th st for commuters. None of this access to the airport excuse.

    Widen deerfoot to 4+ lanes from 32nd to stoney, be done with it.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    0
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by Tik-Tok


    Hence why I said...



    Meaning there would still need to be a tunnel, but it wouldn't need to be as long.
    Fair enough, I misunderstood. The problem then becomes paying the airport for the substantially more land needed, that the airport likely would not be on board due to them wanting to develop some of those lands, and that widening all that road still has a cost as well. The second one would be the ultimate deal-breaker though.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    0
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by Abeo
    Widen deerfoot to 4+ lanes from 32nd to stoney, be done with it.
    This would cost substantially more and is the Province of Alberta's jurisdiction anyway.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    .
    My Ride
    .
    Posts
    654
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Originally posted by frinkprof
    This would cost substantially more and is the Province of Alberta's jurisdiction anyway.
    It is going to have to be done eventually, its a problem now, and from what I've heard the province will give it back to the city once the ring road is done. Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't have the access to info you do.

    In any case, Barlow as it sits now is a commuter road primarily, with a tiny bit of the traffic going to the airport.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Airdrie
    My Ride
    2023 Durango SRT 392
    Posts
    160
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I love how people ALWAYS complain that this city NEVER thinks about the future when it comes to infrastructure....and when it does people cry about it.
    "Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Not Aspen
    My Ride
    Two from Freemont
    Posts
    9,808
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Originally posted by Tik-Tok

    (Green line, my proposal)
    How does the airport authority plan on having planes take off and land when it is blowing 50-60 km/h out of the W or WSW with the alignment of these new runways?

    That is going to be interesting watching a 777 coming into land with a a massive crab angle. haha

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    0
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by Abeo


    It is going to have to be done eventually, its a problem now, and from what I've heard the province will give it back to the city once the ring road is done. Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't have the access to info you do.
    I believe that's just for maintenance of Deerfoot Trail, not for capital infrastructure improvements.

    You have all the access to information that I do.

    Originally posted by Abeo
    In any case, Barlow as it sits now is a commuter road primarily, with a tiny bit of the traffic going to the airport.
    As someone else said, people take it to avoid Deerfoot. A lot of the issue with Barlow closing is that it leaves one route for most people to access the airport, which is to take Deerfoot, which can be highly unreliable and this is exacerbated when you add that additional traffic to it (from Barlow). The tunnel, combined with a completed SE ring road provides a primary access to the airport for basically everyone along ring road and 22X, as well as an important secondary access for when Deerfoot is backed up (which isn't uncommon).

    Also, the airport tunnel will be providing an east-west link (yes commuter link) for future development in the city's northeast. In this case, it is either build the tunnel, or pay to upgrade all the surrounding routes (at a higher projected cost) to provide those connections at a sufficient capacity.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Only 15min from Aspen!
    My Ride
    Nothing interesting anymore
    Posts
    8,422
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Originally posted by benyl


    How does the airport authority plan on having planes take off and land when it is blowing 50-60 km/h out of the W or WSW with the alignment of these new runways?
    New runways will be Cat III, so autoland. A 777 can land at insane crosswinds, check out these initial crosswind test landings.


Page 1 of 3 1 2 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. City and Airport Authority ink tunnel deal!

    By dino_martini in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 29
    Latest Threads: 07-07-2011, 06:42 PM
  2. City Council approves blowing money on study, instead of using money to clear roads

    By Tik-Tok in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 29
    Latest Threads: 12-16-2009, 09:02 AM
  3. London Airport to Airport Transfer

    By riceeater in forum Travel and Vacation
    Replies: 9
    Latest Threads: 08-11-2009, 01:09 PM
  4. WTB: Apple AirPort Express or AirPort Extreme Base Station

    By Dren in forum Computer Hardware & Peripherals
    Replies: 3
    Latest Threads: 04-02-2009, 05:24 AM
  5. U.N. unanimously approves Iran sanctions

    By collectskulls in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 22
    Latest Threads: 12-24-2006, 03:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •