Quantcast
durango 5.9 RT vs. cherokee V8 LE - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: durango 5.9 RT vs. cherokee V8 LE

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    403
    My Ride
    ferrari enzo.....lol jk
    Posts
    610
    Rep Power
    0

    Default durango 5.9 RT vs. cherokee V8 LE

    which is more reliable?better for going offroading?acceleration?

    overall?

    i think the durango 5.9 RT

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    403
    My Ride
    ferrari enzo.....lol jk
    Posts
    610
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    durango



    cherokee


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    Denali
    Posts
    221
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    i personally really like cherokee's... but that is just my opinion

    my mom is on her 4th one, and wouldn't buy anything else

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    dog sled
    Posts
    252
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    If you get the durango, go with the R/T version. They have plenty of go.

    My mom was gona buy one but then settled for the jeep. She liked the feel of the jeep more. The jeep came with leather!!!
    not to mention it's trail rated. and with the V8 they really go, even the I6 still has plenty of power.

    It would be tough choice. I would choose on which one you like the look of best. Seeing as they are made by the same company and features are comparable.

    The Jeep is definately better on the inside. Probly has better off-road capabilities too

    Cool new forum eh?

    Go with the jeep

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Calgary, NW
    Posts
    798
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    The 5.9l is an awesome engine, But it's a PIG on gas. Plus it requires premium gas or it knocks. The Cherokee is better, easier to off-road. The Cherokee had a 5.9l version in 98 that would make it a great off-roader!! But the 4.7l in the new Cherokee(99+) is a great all around engine.
    How about a 2002 Dakota
    like this one



    http://forums.beyond.ca/showthread.p...threadid=35361
    Last edited by tc3; 02-11-2004 at 09:28 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Beyonds Official Realtor
    My Ride
    www.jordanlotoski.com
    Posts
    2,360
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    armada.....

    "BEYONDS OFFICIAL REALTOR"
    Instagram @jordan_empirewest
    Ranked #1 RE/MAX Professionals (2013-2022)
    Ranked #2 RE/MAX Agent Calgary (2017-2020)
    Ranked Top 100 Re/Max agent Western Canada (2013-2021)
    Ranked #56 RE/MAX Agent Worldwide (2014)
    Ranked Top 100 Re/Max Agent Canada (2013-2020)

    Check out my mobile app
    goagent.ca/98F1B2F9

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    2018 Ford F150 SCREW
    Posts
    1,118
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    don't knock the 4.7 in the jeeps. those things are quick.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    1,295
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    My 2 cents:

    For offroading Jeep, hands down.

    As for speed the Durango R/T isn't great, it feels a lot faster then it is. If you like the looks of the new Durango (very slim chance if you've ever seen one) you can get it with the HEMI and thats the better way to go. I think the 98 Jeep with the 5.9 was actually faster then the Durango R/T. Currently in the JGC you have two flavors for the 4.7, regular and high output. The HO's, orginally only available on the Overland edition are now an available option on all the limited's and these things go. Not as torquey as the 5.9 but more hp and better mpg, if a 4.7HO went up against a Durango R/T my money would be on the jeep, especially in a 1/4 mile or longer. The 4.7 is also a lot smoother then the 5.9, not to mention quieter, the tranny is quite a bit better on the 4.7 IMO. Given the choice I would take a Jeep with the 4.7HO anyday over the Durango R/T. Much classier vehicle, with a near luxury car interior.

    Hard Numbers:

    5.9 R/T and 98 Ltd Jeep - 250hp 345lb/ft tq
    5.9 (non R/T) - 245hp 335lb/ft tq

    4.7 - 235hp 300lb/ft tq
    4.7HO - 265hp 335lb/ft tq

    PS - That pic of the Durango is misleading, as it may or may not be an R/T. An R/T comes with single 3" exaust, different rims and chrome badging.
    You start with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the bag of experience before you empty the bag of luck.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    YWG
    Posts
    3,119
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    If I could get a diesel Durango... I would get one...

    However I find the Jeep has much better interiors and overall better styling.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Calgary, Ab
    My Ride
    2001 Grand am
    Posts
    414
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    they're both dodge

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    calgary
    My Ride
    STI
    Posts
    808
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Buddy has a 5.9l R/t and we have taken it on a number of trips to fernie for snow boarding. I love it very comfy good looking and has some decent power. Also very stable and nimble footed on slippery highways for an SUV! go with the RT

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    2009 Elantra Touring
    Posts
    1,325
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    The new Dodge trucks offer the 5.7L Hemi instead of the old 5.9L V8. The 5.9 L is based on early 90's technology and it doesn't have the best track record for reliability. My pick for offroading hands down would be the Jeep, but also for reliability - the 4.7L Engines are well designed.

    The older Durango's look nice, and if you are after a ride, it might be worth going with the Durango, but that's it.

    Thats my opinion.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Calgary, ab
    My Ride
    Hemi, ZX6R
    Posts
    2,501
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    For true offroad use, i feel theyre both shitty...

    but for basic offroad use, i'd have to go with the cherokee

    what kind of offroad use this for???

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    2009 Elantra Touring
    Posts
    1,325
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    I know its just your opinion, but it seems odd that you'd feel a Jeep is not suited to offroad use. Hell they made SUV's even before the term was invented, and offroad use has been a major design feature of all the Jeeps.

    Have a look:
    http://www.jeepconnection.com/pictures/

    There aren't many vehicles that you can drive from the dealer's lot to rough roads using the stock setups. I guess it just strikes me as odd whenever someone says jeeps aren't for offroad use.

    I have to assume you've never offroaded in one.
    Last edited by 1badPT; 02-11-2004 at 02:52 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    1,295
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Originally posted by 1badPT
    The new Dodge trucks offer the 5.7L Hemi instead of the old 5.9L V8. The 5.9 L is based on early 90's technology and it doesn't have the best track record for reliability. My pick for offroading hands down would be the Jeep, but also for reliability - the 4.7L Engines are well designed.

    The older Durango's look nice, and if you are after a ride, it might be worth going with the Durango, but that's it.

    Thats my opinion.
    Again you pickin on a motor I use to have. Whats with that? lol I disagree, the 360 has been a workhorse motor for chryco since the muscle car days. While it did go through a minor redesign for fuel injection it still retained a lot of its old specs from before. Considering you can get a crate 360 with 380-400hp N/A with the same bottom end from chryco I don't think 250hp is going to bother it much. Pretty stout little motor actually, it just needs to breathe a little better and it can make a ton of power.


    Originally posted by ryder_23
    For true offroad use, i feel theyre both shitty...

    but for basic offroad use, i'd have to go with the cherokee

    what kind of offroad use this for???
    Bah, see the post above. Good luck finding a factory car that will handle off road use as well as a jeep.
    You start with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the bag of experience before you empty the bag of luck.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    2009 Elantra Touring
    Posts
    1,325
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    LOL I know I pick on that motor, I guess its just I know too many people who have had problems with it. We'll just have to disagree on that, but I will agree with you that with a few breather mods will really wake that engine up.

Similar Threads

  1. WTB: Supercharger 99 Durango/NOS

    By rathorn in forum Automotive Parts [Mechanical Parts]
    Replies: 0
    Latest Threads: 01-26-2004, 04:03 AM
  2. durango sites

    By trendkill in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 2
    Latest Threads: 10-28-2003, 04:54 PM
  3. Smoked by a Durango(ugly)

    By Geeboy in forum Cars, Bikes, Machines
    Replies: 23
    Latest Threads: 10-01-2003, 07:20 AM
  4. FS: 97 Jeep Grand Cherokee Ltd

    By bksze in forum Automotive Parts
    Replies: 1
    Latest Threads: 04-24-2003, 11:57 AM
  5. Cherokee on John Laurie by Ranchlands

    By kenny in forum Street Encounters
    Replies: 2
    Latest Threads: 07-23-2002, 10:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •