New year.. New reading problems lol.
New year.. New reading problems lol.
Submaker.Illest.
And the difference between the MR than ran 3.13 and the SE than ran 3.10 is most likely the way better factory tune 2011+ evos have plus maybe a different driver.
Damn, time to redneck it up and get a ZL1Originally posted by rage2
GTR and M3 were last year only. The GTR ran a 2:53.2, and the M3 3:05.4. Modern BMW's suck for laptimes now.
The C63 BS and the ZL1 are damn close in every comparo. The ZL1 gives up a little in handling, but has more power. On a more technical track, the C63 BS is slightly faster. Motor Trend's best drivers car had the C63 BS slightly ahead (1:38.9 vs 1:39.2) at Laguna Seca. Still, very impressive considering 1/2 the pricetag.
My Tesla referral link: https://ts.la/moon14483
Tesla new owner FAQ: https://forums.beyond.ca/threads/411...37#post4928237
I'd like to try a ZL1 to see what it's all about. I don't really care about laptimes anymore, especially since we don't have a track, I value how fun a car is to drive.
Originally posted by SEANBANERJEE
I have gone above and beyond what I should rightfully have to do to protect my good name
Apparently C&D made this note about the 1LE:
"Remove the one regrettable slip-up (poorly timed 3-2 downshift) and add a fresh set of Goodyears, and you have a sub-three-minute care for the low, low price of $37,390."
Apparently the driver thinks they lost 1-2 seconds with that mistake... That would basically put it faster than a Mustang that weighs about the same but has 230 more hp than the Camaro.
For those that don't know what the 1LE is (I had to search) it's Chevy's answer to the Mustang Boss which is going out of production.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...le_first_test/
Looks really nice.
I guess the link I saw had the wrong pictures.Originally posted by LOLzilla
Looks really nice.
Honestly was not familiar with the 1LE but the performance figures are quite amazing. I'm very surprised and impressed actually. The Boss 302 was startling for me, this even more so. That is a high value vehicle, you're getting alot for your money.
But agreed. Not the best looking thing.
The colour and black wheels do nothing for that car. Other than that I think the camaro is a cool looking car, especially the convertible.
That 458 time is really fast. Must be a really good track for that car... I know for sure on other tracks the GTR can beat it.
Yep, FWIW The 1LE option was available in 88-92 camaro's for use in factory racing (like the players challenge series)...it's the rarest, most sought after camaro of that body style.Originally posted by LOLzilla
For those that don't know what the 1LE is (I had to search) it's Chevy's answer to the Mustang Boss which is going out of production.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...le_first_test/
Looks really nice.
Last edited by Anomaly; 01-04-2013 at 12:03 AM.
Fixed your post.Originally posted by Redlined_8000
That 458 time is really fast. Must be a really good track for that car... I know for sure on other tracks that homely Nissan supercar may be able to beat it.
http://jalopnik.com/5760248/how-ferrari-spinsOriginally posted by Redlined_8000
That 458 time is really fast. Must be a really good track for that car... I know for sure on other tracks the GTR can beat it.
Originally posted by SEANBANERJEE
I have gone above and beyond what I should rightfully have to do to protect my good name
It is like they have only been called out once as other people still want to drive their cars
Ferrari is untouchable. The name alone ensures that they will always be amongst the most desirable cars in the world. One fringe journalist's blog isn't going to change almost 100 years of tradition.Originally posted by schocker
It is like they have only been called out once as other people still want to drive their cars
Nissan did this as well with their GTR.
93 Camaro Z28 (The fast one)
01 Trans Am WS6 (The cute one)
Esla T6 Dog Sled (Not cute, not fast, scary as hell)
Are you just referring to the whole Nurburgring "cut slicks" issue with the original 09 posted times?Originally posted by Gripenfelter
Nissan did this as well with their GTR.
I really don't think Nissan or many other carmakers make you:
- Call up the factory to pre-authorize any magazine tests
- Bring a straight line car and track car for every authorized magazine test involving both
- Bring a technician team to every track to "tune" the car for that track ahead of every comparo
- Because of said tuning, inflate magazine performance results to levels unachievable by private customer cars
In fact, for the GTR, private customer cars have not only matched but surpassed magazine tested results stock, especially in the 12 and 13 models.
The only other car where I've really heard of this type of consistent behavior as what's mentioned in the Ferrari article is whenever a Viper ACR is tested. But it's only the tech team and tuning per track that takes place. And as a true track car, buyers would expect to generally do the same thing when racing it, so I'm not really surprised by that vs. Ferrari's which are more designed for general use.
I agree but I wouldn't call Chris Harris a fringe journalist. He is pretty popular and his reviews/videos are all pretty good imo.Originally posted by heavyD
Ferrari is untouchable. The name alone ensures that they will always be amongst the most desirable cars in the world. One fringe journalist's blog isn't going to change almost 100 years of tradition.
Ya that 458 time is even almost 2 seconds faster than a LP-570 Superleggara..... Which is crazy lol. Thats stupid...
Oh well I still love the high revving NA power of a Ferrari