Originally posted by whydontchathen
ummm no, that's not how I interpret the Indians' preemptive rights to the continent of North America. By 1st world standards land is owned, right? Well, since the Indians were in North America looooong before the Europeans, then I submit that the Indians owned the land before we did. So it was theirs.
unintelligent argument? really? Well okay, if you want to go to the heart of the argument, treaties were made with the Indians sporadically throughout the 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th centuries, and then they were broken. The making of treaties by the Europeans with the Indians indicates that Europeans did firstly recognize the Indians' claim to the land. And then they just stomped all over them.
Now if you want to bring up compensatory payments to the Indians, the money that the Indians receive from the Canadian Government now ties back to the treaties that were made between the nations. Just because they were made over a century ago, ppl tend to forget that.
Just bcz all of that happened a long long time ago, present day society dismisses it all as no longer relevant, not important in this day and age. But these were still crimes against the Indian nations, no matter how long ago.
And btw, no, I don't have a single drop of Indian blood in my ancestry.
The middle east is pretty screwed up as is, but even the jews and palestinians know that if they rolled into the UN with "but I was here first" arguments they would all get laughed out.
Lygos
to
Byzantium
to
Augusta Antonina
to
New Rome
to
Constantinople
to
Kostantiniyye
to now
Istanbul
Greeks, Romans, Byzantines and Ottomans all died over that dirt.
The world evolves and it's people dissapear with the civilizations that conquored that city through time. it's how the world has worked for millenia..
2017 VW Jetta 1.4T (winter car)
2010 F-350 Nortruck Tool Shed
2007 BMW 5 (Wifey's)
2004 Audi A4 1.8T 6spd Stage III w/ Meth
1985 F-250 6.9L IDI w/ATS turbo