Quantcast
Idle No More protests target bridges, roads across Canada - Page 17 - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Page 17 of 50 FirstFirst ... 7 16 17 18 27 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 340 of 993

Thread: Idle No More protests target bridges, roads across Canada

  1. #321
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    calgary.ab.ca
    My Ride
    E90M3 510 Wagon
    Posts
    8,034
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    no, but really. any wednesday i've stop by the tables i've walked out with at least an extra $100

  2. #322
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cowtown
    My Ride
    10' 4Runner SR5
    Posts
    6,373
    Rep Power
    60

    Default

    Originally posted by dj_rice
    http://video.brantfordexpositor.ca/v.../2098990014001
    [/IMG]
    I bet if the media wasn't there, he would have got his ass kicked and ended up in hospital.
    Ultracrepidarian

  3. #323
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    86
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by vengie


    That same Charter protects the rest of our rights to use the roadways out tax dollars paid for.

    Phil, you should if possible convey the message to superiors that people are getting pissed off with the inaction of Police and politicians. Through my social groups I am hearing of organization of a blockade to the Grey Eagle (not just through this board) as the message being sent by police is "it is ok to do so, as long as you aren't violent!". Enough double standards, times to ENFORCE the laws you have sworn to uphold.
    You think they don't already know that? There are teams of lawyers for governments, police services, and all manner of invested parties, working around the clock across the country on this crap, and no one has the perfect answer to make everyone happy.

    I didn't say I agreed with it, and I'm just trying to offer a possible explanation. I'm pretty comfortable with what my job entails, the law, and how I fit into all of this, so I'll assume that last sentence wasn't a personal jab and more of a general assertion about your view on this.
    ---------------------------------------------------

    Any writings in this forum are my personal view and all opinions expressed should be taken as such; there is no implied or direct opinion representative of anything but my own thoughts on various subjects.

  4. #324
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    2015 Ram 1500
    Posts
    4,980
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    haha. I'd be down to protest.
    Originally posted by HeavyD
    you know you are making the right decision if Toma opposes it.

  5. #325
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    4 doors, 4 cylinders
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    One thing is certain, there is bound to be case law coming out of this at some point.

    Like Phil said, we all know this is a nuisance, but I think I would be in the majority if I said I would rather spend a week answering why I haven't been arresting every native person blocking a roadway, than 3 years in court proceedings explaining my actions. I wish 'because beyond told me to' was a good enough reason. Police going in and arresting people will have such ridiculously far reaching ramifications, it's easy to sit here and look through tunnel vision and only see the quick fix, but you have to understand the consequences of this when it eventually goes to court.

    I can already see the 'excessive force' complaints from every native person arrested. All the arms in casts, no matter how gently the cuffs were put on. It's going to be a shit show.
    Just because it happened to you, doesn't make it interesting.

  6. #326
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Unemployment Line
    My Ride
    Sierra, RDX
    Posts
    2,672
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    .
    Last edited by FraserB; 01-16-2013 at 11:33 PM.
    See Crank. See Crank Walk. Walk Crank Walk.

  7. #327
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    35
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Damn that guy is boss

  8. #328
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,289
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    .
    Last edited by kaput; 03-12-2019 at 02:49 AM.

  9. #329
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cowgary
    My Ride
    AWOL
    Posts
    972
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Why stoop to their level and block the casino entrance? Go counter-protest like buddy up there, or organize something meaningful downtown or somewhere... Start in the casino parking lot, then get migrated out onto the roundabout... no need to block the road... altho it may eventually turn into a stream of "pedestrians"

    Cops should be giving these clowns jaywalking tickets at least. Get their names, arrest them for identification purposes if they don't cooperate. It's what they do to whitey, so come on with that equality already!

  10. #330
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    calgary
    Posts
    39
    Rep Power
    0

    Default



    They guy with the toque doesnt even look like a indian more like a hipster

  11. #331
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cowtown
    My Ride
    10' 4Runner SR5
    Posts
    6,373
    Rep Power
    60

    Default

    I don't know if this is completely analogous but this whole situation seems to remind me of some women who want equality but have everything bought for them. Then when I don't I'm a cheapass! With respect to the situation at hand, it seems like all the equality of the common Canadian should be provided. Agreed. Then there's more on top! You don't give the extra, you're cheap AND racist! That's what this whole thing boils down to for me.

    It seems like this whole cat and mouse game where its just easier to accept rather than spending the effort fighting about. That's my take on how the government has been dealing with it for the last few decades. Happy wife equals happy life (kinda)?
    Ultracrepidarian

  12. #332
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    Ford F150
    Posts
    481
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Originally posted by JustGo
    One thing is certain, there is bound to be case law coming out of this at some point.

    Like Phil said, we all know this is a nuisance, but I think I would be in the majority if I said I would rather spend a week answering why I haven't been arresting every native person blocking a roadway, than 3 years in court proceedings explaining my actions. I wish 'because beyond told me to' was a good enough reason. Police going in and arresting people will have such ridiculously far reaching ramifications, it's easy to sit here and look through tunnel vision and only see the quick fix, but you have to understand the consequences of this when it eventually goes to court.

    I can already see the 'excessive force' complaints from every native person arrested. All the arms in casts, no matter how gently the cuffs were put on. It's going to be a shit show.
    So if there`s a counter protest at the casino, will they be given the same leeway?
    I can eat more hot wings than you.

  13. #333
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    Saab 9-5
    Posts
    337
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    I think they should block off all the Saddle Dome entrances before the Flames game.That would be so cool.
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/34/The_Smoking_Man_(X-Files).jpg

  14. #334
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    BoostLand
    My Ride
    something green
    Posts
    1,931
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Were there cops present in the incident above? There is no way they should be allowed to jump on that persons truck, or even impeded its movement. That is not "peaceful protest", at that point they are attacking, and damaging her person/property.
    Too loud for Aspen

  15. #335
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Originally posted by Maxt
    Were there cops present in the incident above? There is no way they should be allowed to jump on that persons truck, or even impeded its movement. That is not "peaceful protest", at that point they are attacking, and damaging her person/property.
    Does this not constitute some form of assault?

    They are impeding this person from leaving an area, surrounding and damaging a vehicle (yes, I would call it damage no matter how little. That guy on the hood would have left a scratch of scuff) and the person in the vehicle I can guarantee felt they had the potential to be harmed.

  16. #336
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    BoostLand
    My Ride
    something green
    Posts
    1,931
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Originally posted by fiveowed


    They guy with the toque doesnt even look like a indian more like a hipster
    You're right.. Another bleeding heart hipster do gooder that has found his inner free loader...
    http://www.edmontonsun.com/2013/01/1...-hits-edmonton
    Last edited by Maxt; 01-17-2013 at 02:25 AM.
    Too loud for Aspen

  17. #337
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    BoostLand
    My Ride
    something green
    Posts
    1,931
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    I haven't been able to find any backup news for this, but this was posted on Calgary Puck.


    Originally Posted by Jets4Life
    Not sure if anyone has heard anything about this, but a couple of "protesters" tried to forcefully enter my work camp east of Conklin. They pulled a gun on a security woman, and tried to enter the work area, before being intercepted by two RCMP patrol cars. There was a brief standoff, before both men were arrested. I am shocked that this has not made the news, as everyone at my camp is talking about it... __________________
    Too loud for Aspen

  18. #338
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    2015 Ram 1500
    Posts
    4,980
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    hahaha....

    http://www.edmontonsun.com/2013/01/1...rgely-illusory

    So the guys that were blocking the highway in Edmonton yesterday, and the chief in that video claiming the white guy counter protesting is on "his" land are all full of shit, the band sold most of it's land in 1880 for a cash settlement, with the last of the residents being bought out in 1889. Their problem? the supereme court voted unanimously that their claim to an additional entitlement to $2.5 BILLION had no grounds, and was dismissed.

    The first thing to remember about the Idle No More blockade that kinda, sorta happened on the QEII highway just south of town on Wednesday is that the group behind it — the Papaschase First Nation — isn’t even a real aboriginal band.

    If anything, Papaschase is an air band — existing only in thin air. It has a chief, but no reserve. Even the Supreme Court of Canada has rejected its attempt to file a land claim. Yet there they were disrupting the busiest highway in the province.

    Like much of the Idle movement, the Papaschase grievances are largely illusory. Yet that didn’t stop them from trying to harass, delay and generally annoy tens of thousands of law-abiding Albertans.

    The ancestors of today’s Papaschase complainants signed away their reserve in the late 1880s. Of the 10 families on the reserve (which covered most of current southeast Edmonton) in 1886, seven — including the chief — gave up their claims in return for a cash payment. Most moved to the Enoch reserve west of town or drifted away.

    The remaining three families agreed to be bought out in 1889.

    Much of present-day Edmonton south of Whitemud Drive, including the drive itself, is on what was once Papaschase land.

    Roughly, the old reserve ran from 51st Avenue in the north to Ellerslie Road on the south, and from 122nd Street in the west to 34th Street in the east — a large (and valuable) chunk of the city. It includes Southgate Mall, Mill Woods Town Centre and South Edmonton Common, the newest leg of Anthony Henday Drive and four high schools, Harry Ainlay, Louis St. Laurent, Holy Trinity and J. Percy Page.

    Roughly 175,000 Edmontonians today live on what was once Papaschase land. But the operative word is “was.”

    The “band” was not seeking a return of its land. Rather it wanted compensation of a mere $2.5 billion.

    However, in 2008, the Supreme Court ruled the current group of aboriginals who claim to be descendants of Chief Papaschase could not file a land claim. The justices were unanimous in their decision.

    The Papaschase complaint may point to the biggest problem with Idle No More.

    Since its inception last fall, the movement has degenerated into a bitter stew of gripes about injuries both real and imagined. It has become a hodgepodge of hysterical and conspiratorial claims, such as the mistaken belief that the recent federal budget bill makes it easier for bands to sell off their lands permanently. It has become a patchwork quilt representing any and every complaint ever harboured by a single aboriginal or band.

    Idle is too ill-defined and too splintered to ever be satisfied.

    Perhaps that is why so many non-aboriginal Canadians have proclaimed themselves fed-up with Idle in particular and aboriginal complaints in general.

    This week 60% of Canadians told pollsters Ipsos-Reid that “most of the problems of native people are brought on by themselves.” Similarly, two-thirds said there was already enough money going from Ottawa to the reserves. A further 81% said no more money should go until audits and controls could be put in place to ensure an end to chronic waste of tax dollars.

    Disdain for Idle’s claims was highest on the Prairies – not surprising since our region is home to most of the country’s biggest, traditional reserves. On the question of whether band finances are well-managed, for instance, just 8% of Saskatchewan and Manitoba residents and just 16% of Albertans said “yes.”

    While Canadians are sympathetic to those who live on reserves, they have tired of the permanent claims of victimhood and demands for more money and even less accountability.
    Originally posted by HeavyD
    you know you are making the right decision if Toma opposes it.

  19. #339
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,192
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Originally posted by JustGo
    t I think I would be in the majority if I said I would rather spend a week answering why I haven't been arresting every native person blocking a roadway, than 3 years in court proceedings explaining my actions.
    Well we got our answer as to why nothing is being done folks.

    I had no idea that part of the decision making an Officer makes involves how long they'll have to be in court. That statement scares the SHIT out of me, am I alone? The fact an officer decides whether or not they're going to uphold the law based on whether it will require additional work? Yikes.

  20. #340
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    09 Lancer Ralliart
    Posts
    95
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by rx7_turbo2


    Well we got our answer as to why nothing is being done folks.

    I had no idea that part of the decision making an Officer makes involves how long they'll have to be in court. That statement scares the SHIT out of me, am I alone? The fact an officer decides whether or not they're going to uphold the law based on whether it will require additional work? Yikes.
    I think you're taking his quote out of context.

    (Facetiously) The missing part to JustGo's statement is that there's no ticket revenue to be generated from this arrest. Clearly CPS' divisional duties are:
    Homicide - ticketing
    Burglary - ticketing
    Gang unit - ticketing
    Traffic - you better believe it's ticketing

    All other crimes are secondary.



    In seriousness, I don't doubt there'd be incredible hassles, spurious claims of excessive force, etc. so the fact remains that it's easier to let people break the law in minor ways than to enforce it with an iron fist. Especially where the Nates are involved, which is basically what Phil said.

    If the Grey Eagle blockade goes ahead (on city land not Nate land) be prepared for CPS to slap cuffs on all the non-Nates doing so.
    Last edited by 1barA4; 01-17-2013 at 08:12 AM.
    Originally posted by hurrdurr
    I wouldn't gamble with a DP on one of these.

Page 17 of 50 FirstFirst ... 7 16 17 18 27 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 72
    Latest Threads: 05-24-2013, 07:13 PM
  2. Some Questions involving Wireless Bridges

    By -relk- in forum Computer Help Desk
    Replies: 3
    Latest Threads: 12-19-2012, 12:13 PM
  3. Replies: 28
    Latest Threads: 03-03-2009, 02:18 PM
  4. JDigital - Burning Bridges to Paradise (March 2008)

    By DJ Lazy in forum Entertainment
    Replies: 9
    Latest Threads: 03-18-2008, 07:21 PM
  5. Trucks & bridges...

    By Superesc in forum General
    Replies: 9
    Latest Threads: 04-17-2007, 03:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •