Registered User
https://www.greencarreports.com/news...ikely-for-2021
I’m really excited for the hybrid.
This sounds weird, but I’m hoping for a 2.3L hybrid. 310/350 on engine and 400/500 combined.
But, more than likely we’ll see the 493/600 3L EcoBoost hybrid like the Lincoln, and only in platinum/limited trims.
I hope they don’t limit production to the super expensive trims. A smaller hybrid in XLT form is where I’m at. Something about trucks and mpg tickles my fancy!
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents... some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age."
-H.P. Lovecraft
Registered User 
Phev F150 that gets ~20 km all electric range would be really interesting to me.
Originally Posted by killramos
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Registered User
Don’t short change it. 30-50km is where they should shoot for.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Most last generation PHEV are 15-30 miles, so I can see a 12-14kW battery taking us 30km under light driving.
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents... some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age."
-H.P. Lovecraft
Registered User
Yeah, I suspect it'll be more, but for me, 20 km is plenty. But then again, I live 3.9 km from work . . .
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
coffee shop soy boy
It’s also a truck, gonna take a lot of batteries to move a half ton around for 50km. And you don’t want to neuter payload in The process and make it useless.
I agree with ES, a high EV Range is not the number to chase here.
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Registered User
Always a wise decision.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Registered User
It’ll only be quoted unladen. You’ll never see economy or range numbers with a load.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Therefore, they’re free to say - hey look in the most economic format (single cab, 2wd) we see xx kms of range.
I don’t care for an EV range when loaded, the motor won’t be capable of that.
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents... some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age."
-H.P. Lovecraft
coffee shop soy boy
Not what I mean. I mean hundreds of lbs of Batteries needed to give it 50km of unladen range never disappears and effectively reduces the payload of the truck all the time. This is already a big problem with the amount of tech and toys in trucks these days. With electric motors, toys, the base engine, PLUS all the batteries needed to give it tons of EV range you end up with a half ton with the payload rating of a Jeep Wrangler.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Registered User
Oh I see. Yes, very fair statement - good call.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents... some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age."
-H.P. Lovecraft
Registered User
I guess, I'm just getting really annoyed, between the cold start rattle/indexing noise (I think the cam phasers will need to be replaced), the incessant rattle from the back seat area and now this rear suspension clunk. Damn Ford, my previous truck (2015 Sierra) didn't have any rattles, creaks or clunks after 3 years 60K km's, starting to doubt my move to Ford.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Registered User
I lost confidence in the ecoboost completely with my 2013. otherwise I think you just got the friday before a long weekend truck unfortunately... but thats why we have warranty. im sure it'll get figured out in the end.
Registered User
Wednesday build dateThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Registered User
Stay in there. I seem to be following in your truck footsteps lol, but my ‘18 is at 45km now and still perfect!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Well, I noticed a tiny squeak rattle thing. Will monitor and update if it gets worse.
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents... some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age."
-H.P. Lovecraft
Registered User
haha, I think it's me following in your truck footsteps? I only got my F150 a year ago.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Registered User
so... someone please confirm this with me.
F150 - Tire wear is typically on the back being RWD with hard acceleration with a light load and or just alot of highway driving... but will have more front tire wear if in the city with stop and go?
I have tires i'm going to put on that are 2mm different in the front/rear set and just want to confirm but that is the type of wear I'm seeing... (of course the shoulders are more worn on the front axel set)
Registered User
I have a healthy mix of highway and city with a fair chunk of that highway being stoney or deerfoot. I always see rear tires wear on my truck more than the front regardless of if I put on 2000km that month on the highway or 1000 in stop and go.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Registered User
Rear tires wear faster in city too. But you want best ores on steering/braking axle....
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hayan Namja
The overall wear for me was rears, but the biggest difference was that the rears would wear down in the centre (over inflation) and the fronts on the shoulders (under) for the same placard PSI.
My Tesla referral link: https://ts.la/moon14483
Tesla new owner FAQ: https://forums.beyond.ca/threads/411...37#post4928237
Registered User
Unless you have a really bad alignment it’s generally the rear tires wearing quicker on a truck.
Registered User
Mine was a 13 too that was dog sh*t. Interesting.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Cos...
Posting Permissions
Quote