Quantcast
2006 Dodge Charger Concept - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: 2006 Dodge Charger Concept

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba
    My Ride
    383 Camaro LT1
    Posts
    794
    Rep Power
    22

    Default 2006 Dodge Charger Concept



    Powered by a 5.7L Hemi with 350+hp.



    The new Hemi makes 345 hp and 375 lb.-ft. of torque with just 345 cubic inches, an iron block, one cam, pushrods and two valves per cylinder. It's every bit the equal of GM's Gen III (LS1)--all it needs is beautiful sheetmetal wrapped around it. The 73-acre Saltillo, Mexico assembly plant can pump out 440,000 Hemis per year. We're biased, but we think it'd be a shame for all of them to end up in trucks and mommy mobiles.



    During the production of this story, we heard an unconfirmed report that Dodge was working on a four-door Charger with a V-6 powertrain. We immediately got working on a base variant of our Charger concept with four doors. Dodge's original four-door concept artfully concealed the two extra doors, and that's exactly what we've attempted here. Our conclusion: Charger can indeed work attractively as a four-door.




    This two-door Charger SRT-8 in black shows a full-width three-piece spoiler, classic bar taillights and quad exhaust tips. The V-6 four-door had no spoiler and a single exhaust tip.



    From above and behind, you can see how the classic Charger roofline was retained. Here, the trunk stops at the rear glass, but a hatch version could be implemented (as on the Magnum) without upsetting the body lines.



    The Charger's nose takes styling cues from current Dodge truck and car models. If you squint, there's also a little bit of Mercedes in there too. The classic '68-'70 nose is far too non-aerodynamic to make production and the rendition shown is an acceptable compromise to us.






    Since there is no verified confirmation of an actual Charger, we can only guess about performance and cost. The first--performance--we have a little better idea. With a 345hp Hemi under the hood, a close-ratio automatic gearbox and weighing roughly 3,600 pounds, the Charger would be good for mid 13s in bone-stock trim at sea level. With good tires, gears, headers and an aftermarket exhaust, this could easily dip into the 12s. We would expect the Charger to be squarely in GTO territory, both in performance and price. That means an MSRP somewhere in the mid- to low-30s. If an entry-level 3.5L V-6 version (rental, taxi and police fleets) finds its way into the mix, we're looking at something in the Dodge Intrepid R/T range, both price-wise and performance-wise. Quarter-mile performance with a 242hp V-6 should be in the 15s with a price in the high 20s.

    What do you think
    93 Camaro Z28 (The fast one)
    01 Trans Am WS6 (The cute one)
    Esla T6 Dog Sled (Not cute, not fast, scary as hell)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    2002 Honda Civic LX
    Posts
    49
    Rep Power
    0

    Post

    Wow that car looks great. However what actually gets made will most likely look way different. The designers are not remembering what the cars meant back in the day. Look at the GTO the new one coming out is a horrible grocery getter instead of a powerful muscle car. I dont expect big things to come from the Charger either, if it ever gets made.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    2009 Elantra Touring
    Posts
    1,325
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    They've been toying with a charger concept for a while now.


    Here is your previous thread on it:
    http://forums.beyond.ca/showthread.p...threadid=30167

    more pics of that version:
    http://www.acarshow.com/chgcpt.html

    I'm kind of split. Both designs are

    I think if I had to choose, I'll pick the earlier version simply because I think they did an excellent job of making a 4 door so stylish. This newer version is probably going to be closer to the actual production model since it fits dodge's new styling cues.
    Last edited by 1badPT; 02-18-2004 at 11:35 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    YWG
    Posts
    3,119
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    dodge really needs a 2 dr muscle car... i hate sedans

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Calgary Alberta
    My Ride
    ...BNT0B0X...
    Posts
    8,728
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Does that mean the Dukes of Hazzard will be re-made??...


    This new generation of ricers needs a Daisy Duke dammit...


    Oh and by the way that black one is sweeeeeet
    ...@therealarifjina...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Calgary Alberta
    My Ride
    ...BNT0B0X...
    Posts
    8,728
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Originally posted by sputnik
    dodge really needs a 2 dr muscle car... i hate sedans

    Uhmmm...Viper?? or the Prowler??
    ...@therealarifjina...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    Upass
    Posts
    589
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    I didnt like it at first, but the one in black is

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary AB
    My Ride
    Toyota Rav4 2dr AWD
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I saw this on charger forums cause my lead at work is a charger nut...

    this car is not a design from dodge/chrysler...it's just something a mag or person whipped up. So dont expect this to be what the next Charger is gonna look like.

    There was post on that forum from somebody who claimed they work at the design fabrication at dodge and he said something was in the pipe for a 2006 charger model.

    NOBODY knows what it's going to look like. Hopefully not like this amateur 3d model.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    calgary
    My Ride
    0.8 L of Diesel fury
    Posts
    273
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Don't like the front at all but other thatn that the car doesn't look too bad

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    My Ride
    87gmc4x4
    Posts
    25
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I like it, i didnt see it at the T.O autoshow though

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary AB
    My Ride
    Toyota Rav4 2dr AWD
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    U DIDN'T SEE IT BECAUSE IT ISN'T AN OFFICIAL DODGE CONCEPT !!! DUH !

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    Upass
    Posts
    589
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    On a side note, the new mustangs are so damn nice, like im not a mustang fan at all, but i must admit the new one is so damn . I was wacthing autorotica, and they showed how you can change the gauge cluster lighting, you can choose from 100 colours, now thats pretty cool.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    VaN CItY
    My Ride
    E36///M3
    Posts
    374
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    can you say CHOP!!!!
    Introduce your heart to your throat.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    '10 RX350 & '08 e90 335i
    Posts
    2,189
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    I think it looks pretty nice, they couls soften the lines just a touch IMO, but a great looking domestic.
    Autosignature

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    2008 Mercedes Benz C230, 1968 Chevy Impala
    Posts
    1,922
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Its nice to see the old names returning to the market. id drive one if i could afford it...
    1968 Impala: Status: Stored
    1977 Dodge Triple E RV: Sold
    1989 Mercedes Benz 420 SEL: Sold
    2008 Mercedes Benz C230: Cruising
    2000 Bluebird TC2000: Build phase of skoolie project
    2018 Rav4 XLE: New baby friendly daily

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    VANCOUVER
    Posts
    319
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    are the picture done on a computer?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary AB
    My Ride
    Toyota Rav4 2dr AWD
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Yes. It is a computer render. it is NOT real

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Cowtown
    My Ride
    Acura RSX
    Posts
    289
    Rep Power
    0

    Default


  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    My Ride
    Dakota&charger
    Posts
    0
    Rep Power
    0

    Default 1999 charger looks better

    Hey! Gripenfelter. Your design looks good. But I still
    like the 1999 concept better. Can you incorperate the
    1999 charger looks on to the the 2005 Magnum frame?
    Also can you use some looks off of the 2004 Viper like
    the door scalops instead of the 1999's scalop's?

    I think the new charger should look more like new Viper
    instead of the new Magnum and 300 cars!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    My Ride
    99 Audi A4 2.8L
    Posts
    5
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Wow damn that looks nice. Like a infinity g35 in the back... hehe

    But badass...i wish it had a little more power tho.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Production Pics of the 2006 Pontiac Solstice

    By Gripenfelter in forum Cars, Bikes, Machines
    Replies: 29
    Latest Threads: 04-09-2004, 11:33 PM
  2. Dodge Ram Charger 1991 Help

    By traemyn in forum Mechanical
    Replies: 5
    Latest Threads: 01-12-2004, 06:18 PM
  3. Dodge Charger Concept

    By Gripenfelter in forum Cars, Bikes, Machines
    Replies: 14
    Latest Threads: 12-13-2003, 08:51 PM
  4. 2006 census contracted out to Lockheed Martin

    By Strider in forum General
    Replies: 11
    Latest Threads: 10-18-2003, 03:50 PM
  5. 2006 rx-7 revival

    By dam_guy in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 21
    Latest Threads: 08-19-2003, 06:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •