And this solidifies the point that the general public doesn't care about the reading actual science, or even an article about science but still feel the need to comment about a headline. It's like people see something that's longer than 100 words and get intimidated or bored immediately. No wonder Calgary Herald is at a grade 6 reading level.Originally posted by Sugarphreak
Still, you were the one who presented the article with a bias title... just solidifies my point on the subject, that you can't take anything for face value as it usually gets misrepresented.
It's not a research paper, even less people would read it then. But it brought up reasonable points about both sides' point of views that I'd never thought of and shared it. National Geographic is in favour of showcasing their findings, shocking I know.
And honestly Nick, what was your thread title about real estate? "FALLing house prices" on October 22?
Quote
