Quantcast
Opinions on 2011 Grand Cherokee with HEMI - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Opinions on 2011 Grand Cherokee with HEMI

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Opinions on 2011 Grand Cherokee with HEMI

    I been looking into upgrading into a nicer used SUV with more power and the 2011/2012 Grand Cherokees with the 5.7 V8's have caught my eye...love the look and way less pretentious than the X5/GLK's I been looking at (my budget is high 20's). Anybody know things to look out for on these? If I had the budget I'd buy the ST8s in a heartbeat, but I absolutely hate the look of the pre-2011 ones.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Drumheller, Alberta
    My Ride
    '93 CYM FD3S
    Posts
    92
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    My wife and I just picked up a 2011 Limited with the 5.7 a few weeks ago. We upgraded from a GMC Terrain and are really loving the new Jeep so far.

    This is our first higher end vehicle so I can't comment on how it compares to the X5/GLK, but it seems very well built so far. Took a trip to Saskatoon a few weeks ago and couldn't find anything to complain about except that it sucks back a decent amount of fuel. We were just under 14L/100km for the trip.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    That's a lot haha... But I'm willing to pay that price for more power.. How many km do you have on yours? This generation is actually based on the Mercedes ML I believe.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Drumheller, Alberta
    My Ride
    '93 CYM FD3S
    Posts
    92
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    It has 79k on it right now, and the dealership had it listed for $31k.

    I really love the look of this gen, although I wish the updated headlights from the 2014+ were a direct swap.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 1987
    Location
    SK
    My Ride
    Fit Dugan Signature (2016)
    Posts
    3,376
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    My Tacoma is no better on gas, go for it they're awesome!
    Originally posted by SJW
    Once again another useless post by JRSCOOLDUDE.
    Originally posted by snowcat
    Don't let the e-thugs and faggots get to you when they quote your posts and write stupid shit.
    Originally posted by JRSC00LUDE
    I say stupid shit all the time.
    ^^ Fact Checked

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Damn, forgot about Tacoma's, actually like the new 2016 ones maybe I'll wait till I can afford one lol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    6,852
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    ...
    Last edited by Sugarphreak; 08-14-2019 at 12:25 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    I have a problem spending that kind of money on a Q5 when I've had the 2.0t in my tiny A3... It's going to feel real boring. Plus I hate the look of those, talk about an unmanly vehicle, to reference an old thread, no offence haha
    Last edited by Canucks3322; 06-15-2015 at 12:15 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Also interesting you posted that Q5, I seen it on kijiji since the beginning of the year, I wonder what's wrong with it because it's priced pretty good...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    477
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    The GF has the 5.7 in her grand cherokee, although it's one generation older than what you're looking at. So far it has been a great vehicle for us. Lots of power. Mileage is liveable on the highway. In the city the mileage sucks, you really have to think about driving nicely all the time. But overall it's been trouble free at 150,000km. Other than the starter we had to replace.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    My Ride
    Bicycle
    Posts
    9,279
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Originally posted by mobius
    We were just under 14L/100km for the trip.
    Just rented a 2015 with the V6 with 8sp, average 12L/100km. So that isn't bad for a few extra horses.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    Family Hauler
    Posts
    1,136
    Rep Power
    41

    Default

    Dont buy it if you are commuting in it... my gf's old v6 was an absolute pig in the city... 14 l/100km comes to mind as full city tank averages....

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Kelowna
    My Ride
    Volvo S60 & Jeep GC
    Posts
    701
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Originally posted by lamp_shade_2000
    In the city the mileage sucks, you really have to think about driving nicely all the time.
    This X1000

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,406
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    Originally posted by Canucks3322
    I have a problem spending that kind of money on a Q5 when I've had the 2.0t in my tiny A3... It's going to feel real boring. Plus I hate the look of those, talk about an unmanly vehicle, to reference an old thread, no offence haha
    The Q5 is actually pretty quick for a regular SUV, and faster than a 5.7L GC, so if you're worried about something like the Q5 feeling boring, you may be very disappointed with the GC. It's almost a second slower than a 2.0T Q5 0-60, and will be quite a bit more so at our altitude. It's a nicer vehicle than the GC, but not really the same class either. Worth a try if you can get over whatever puts you off about the looks, and will get you about twice as good mileage while being more fun to drive.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    477
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Originally posted by riander5
    Dont buy it if you are commuting in it... my gf's old v6 was an absolute pig in the city... 14 l/100km comes to mind as full city tank averages....
    Sounds about right. I have a 4.0L 6cyl GC and I average 13-14L/100 doesn't matter if it's city or hwy. GF's HEMI gets 15-17L/100 city and 12-14L/100 hwy depending who's driving. Great vehicle but not designed for fuel efficiency at all

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    6,852
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    ...
    Last edited by Sugarphreak; 08-14-2019 at 12:24 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Beyonder's Opinions on Grand Cherokee Diesel?

    By freshprince1 in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 7
    Latest Threads: 09-28-2015, 08:15 AM
  2. Need opinions: 06 srt8 vs 09 hemi

    By barmanjay in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 24
    Latest Threads: 04-02-2010, 06:36 AM
  3. FS: Cherokee Seats / Grand Cherokee Tracks

    By 410440 in forum Automotive Parts [Aero/Styling/Interior]
    Replies: 0
    Latest Threads: 11-29-2009, 10:10 PM
  4. Grand Cherokee HEMI??

    By MK3HKS in forum Trucks, 4x4 and Offroading Zone
    Replies: 8
    Latest Threads: 09-19-2004, 04:58 PM
  5. 1996-1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee Opinions

    By sputnik in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 11
    Latest Threads: 06-16-2004, 12:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •