My hypothesis is: If I build a custom infill (for living NOT filipping purposes) in the next year, then I will be able to build a higher quality, yet cost-effective home (as compared to the past 3 years or what can be built 2 years from now) because I will have access to better quality trades, at a lower price.
Assumptions:
1. The cost of labour should offset the increase in cost of materials (due to a weak CAD) as in general, labour costs are 2-3 times the cost of material
2. Cost of labour will go up in 2 years where the CAD most likely will not change.
I have an existing inner city lot that I'm looking to build a custom infill on. The intent is to live in this home for at least the next 7-10 years, if not longer. Putting aside the current economic climate and risks with unloading some cash now, I do feel there are may be advantages to build now per my hypothesis above.
I'm now looking to find the right approach to build this and have been exploring the below options, which assume I have pre-designed the home and have blue prints and spec package ready for them build off of:
Option 1. Using a tendering approach, identify a builder whom I want to work with and pre-negotiate a flat fee to build the home. They would be responsible from demo right to handoff of possession, including the subsequent home warranty. My assumption is that this would be hassle free (hopefully) and I would know exactly what I'm paying upfront.
Option 2. Identify a General Contractor (GC), and pay cost + X% (existing GC fee standards have been 20%, not sure if that has changed).
I do not know what the impact to home warranty would be and how to limit the GC from taking me to the cleaners on costs (with exception to change orders). I could ask for actual invoices to get the cost, but he could be getting a kick-back which I guess be controlled. My desire would be to incentivize the GC to get the lowest price possible taking into consideration quality.
Option 3. Identify a GC and pay cost + a flat fee for managing the project. Again similar to #2, I am not sure of the impact on home warranty and need to figure out how to incentivize the GC to get lowest price for quality offered.
For # 2 and 3, I don't want to spend excessive time on due diligence by getting my own quotes, but it looks like I'd have to do this in order to reduce risk of getting taken for a ride. This makes me wonder what I'm paying the GC for - which really looks like they are making sure we stick to the timeline and that he's using his professional expertise to limit deficiencies. I'd then need to look at incentives to make sure we are on schedule while still meeting quality standards. Otherwise I may as well:
Option 4. Be my own GC and get access to trades who are probably willing to pay more attention to me given there isn't much work to be had. Obvious benefits would be $ savings on a GC fee and visibility into actual costs. But, since I've never built before, it may take a bit more time to complete the project and I probably won't know what to look for to limit deficiencies, so I'd have to hire 3rd parties as required to do quality checks. There is no home warranty on this approach, but the savings would be the "budget" for deficiencies.
I'd like to get thoughts / input / insight / ideas on:
1. My hypothesis - am I out to lunch or does it make sense?
2. How to effectively structure an agreement with a builder, GC or trades person to maximize quality at a low price, especially for # 2 - 3 and 4.