Quantcast
North Korea tests Hydrogen nuke. - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: North Korea tests Hydrogen nuke.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Pallet Town
    Posts
    815
    Rep Power
    0

    Default North Korea tests Hydrogen nuke.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/06/asia/n...gen-bomb-test/

    Hydrogen (Tritium) nukes being a order of magnitude more destructive than the US nukes dropped on Japan.

    US claims 5.1 earthquake would not be powerful enough to be certain of Hydrogen nuke, possibly standard nuke.
    Cocoa $11,000 per tonne.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    Turbo stuff
    Posts
    3,409
    Rep Power
    70

    Default

    Maybe they tested a hydogen bomb that failed to go thermonuclear.

    Technically it's an H-Bomb test, even if it's a failure.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    calgary
    My Ride
    CLK 55 / 2g Eclipse / EP3
    Posts
    4,422
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    An hbomb would have created a much strong earthquake (M6?); the resultant earthquake was similar to their last a-bomb test.
    Last edited by revelations; 01-07-2016 at 01:09 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Pallet Town
    Posts
    815
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I find it fascinating the amount of Tritium the US has produced in the last sixty years.

    "According to the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research report in 1996 about the U.S. Department of Energy, only 225 kg (496 lb) of tritium has been produced in the United States since 1955. Since it continually decays into helium-3, the total amount remaining was about 75 kg (165 lb) at the time of the report." - Wiki.

    If the publically allowed information is correct, only four grams of Tritium is needed to boost a standard nuke into an H-bomb. If North Korea has managed to produce four grams of Tritium its an incredibly impressive feat. If they simply bought it, not so much.

    The suggested price of $40,000 per gram - does not do it justice as to the rarity of the material. I mean really, by all metrics Marijuana should be about three times more expensive than Broccoli (if both were legal) but Tritium should be a lot closer to $1 million per gram.
    Last edited by ZenOps; 01-07-2016 at 12:32 AM.
    Cocoa $11,000 per tonne.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    1917 Model T, VW Baja, '18 Ram 2500 CTD/6spd
    Posts
    655
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Originally posted by ZenOps
    If the publically allowed information is correct, only four grams of Tritium is needed to boost a standard nuke into an H-bomb. If North Korea has managed to produce four grams of Tritium its an incredibly impressive feat. If they simply bought it, not so much.
    From my limited understanding, you don't necessarily need Tritium, it can be made using the first stage fission reaction and lithium-6. I think that's how "Ivy Mike" worked.
    Originally posted by ZenOps
    The suggested price of $40,000 per gram - does not do it justice as to the rarity of the material. I mean really, by all metrics Marijuana should be about three times more expensive than Broccoli (if both were legal) but Tritium should be a lot closer to $1 million per gram.
    The price isn't anywhere near that because pricing is set by supply and demand, not simply rarity. The global demand for tritium is small, (I think I read less than 400g/year) and it is produced as a byproduct of nuclear power generation in heavy water moderated reactors. From my layman's understanding, heavy water (Deuterium oxide) as a moderator gets bombarded by neutrons and doesn't readily absorb them (which is why it's a good moderator), but occasionally a Deuterium nucleus captures a neutron and becomes Tritium. The heavy water is regularly treated to remove tritium just in case of a spill.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,406
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    All reports seem to say it's not an H-bomb, not strong enough. Same magnitude as their detonation years ago.

    Also the reason why it would be concerning if they were successful is that H-bombs are compact, so they can fit on the end of a cruise missile.

Similar Threads

  1. North Korea tests another nuke

    By hampstor in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 131
    Latest Threads: 04-08-2013, 07:08 PM
  2. N. Korea fires on S. Korea, injuring at least 4

    By pyroza in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 119
    Latest Threads: 12-01-2010, 10:02 AM
  3. North Korean nuke test #2

    By ZenOps in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 39
    Latest Threads: 05-26-2009, 06:22 PM
  4. N. Korea tests Nuke!

    By creeper in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 60
    Latest Threads: 10-12-2006, 10:43 PM
  5. U.S. Bombers Sent to 'deter' North Korea

    By Zephyr in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 36
    Latest Threads: 09-13-2003, 03:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •