lol it doesn't do to take things so personally.Originally posted by Rocket1k78
You quoted the wrong guy lol, it was the guy below me that said expensive watches are a bad buy. Hang on though, the next bandwagon should be around shortly for you to jump on unless the other 2 wanna squish in for you
Because im nonsensical and un educated i have a hard time writing what i mean to say. All im saying is his remark about buying a "real" watch was a tad douchy. I'm all for nice watches but i'm not going to tell someone to save up and buy a real watch if theyre sporting a $100 watch.
Nobody jumped on a bandwagon. You made a post that made no sense. Redlyne wasn't talking shit, and furthermore, whether or not he's a sponsor has no bearing on what he said regardless.
That's why I said your post was nonsensical: because it was.
Second, your comment also showcases that you aren't educated about watches and therefore don't see or understand what others may find value in. This is also a statement of fact, no? If you better understood watches, chances are that you'd also better understand what gives them value.
A "real" watch, as implied by Redlyne, is one that is built and designed to last. Look at a vintage piece from Omega, Rolex, Hamilton, etc. They share common qualities, and it's those qualities that have made the watch better able to stand the rigors of time (pun intended).
Do you see Fossil's/etc. from 20+ years ago fetching decent money? Do you see many of them for sale at all? Do you think there's a reason for that?
That's the point he was making, that others have made, and more or less the conversation that's been happening. Your comment added no value- why are you surprised that people called you out asking what your point was?