what's your point? That we shouldn't tear down the system because there will be fatalities? That any method is equal to any other because there is no difference between 1 death and a million? Do you even have a point, or are you just being contrary for the sake of being contrary?Originally posted by Seth1968
There's no desirable way to tear down "shit".
People will die.
Well, that is if you think death is a bad thing.