Originally posted by Sentry
Just have the operator set the correction factor to "internet"
Most people don't realize that there is a nice handy feature called 'uncorrected' on the dynojets. If you want to see how fast your car is going to be at the track, ask for the uncorrected value. It spun that drum of 'x' weight, 'x' fast on that particular day for your car and will be an accurate representation of what it can do.
However, if you want to compare it to the "internet" as you say, then the SAE correction factor is what should be used for those comparisons.
As an example, I dynoed 5-6 different E36 M3s from before mods and after. Different temperatures, different days, different times of the years, different kms on the car... they were literally within a few horsepower of eachother on corrected values. Looking on the "internet" at different m3s, in other cities, with elevations all over the place... the power curves were also similarly very close.
It's still not perfect with issues with gearing, etc. and my personal recommendation if someone is going for a tuning session would be that there are some handy features on the load based dynos that can shorten the amount of tuning time,and offer some advantages.
However for simply comparing to ones own baseline on a dynojet, or even against other dynojets (probably the most common dyno in north america) than stick with ye old fixed weight drum dynojet
IS300 - 2JZ-GTE, DIY custom sequential 31psi at 2800rpms, yeehaw.