It started with 991.2 cars. 2017 C4S 0-60 in 3.2 sec and 11.5 @ 121.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It started with 991.2 cars. 2017 C4S 0-60 in 3.2 sec and 11.5 @ 121.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I like neat cars.
Huh. Cool.
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The new RS6 has got to be sub 3.0s 0-60. 11.3 in the quarter according to Carwow.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
My Tesla referral link: https://ts.la/moon14483
Tesla new owner FAQ: https://forums.beyond.ca/threads/411...37#post4928237
They all went turbo. And their lc tech just keeps getting better.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I knew C4S went that quick. I’ve been eyeing them for a while.
Originally posted by SEANBANERJEE
I have gone above and beyond what I should rightfully have to do to protect my good name
I would be very surprised if it ran sub 3.0's, I found the following referencing mid to low 3's:This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Car and Driver https://www.caranddriver.com/audi/rs6-avant
Audi claims this superwagon will rocket to 60 mph in 3.5 seconds and top out at 189 mph
Motor Trend https://www.motortrend.com/cars/audi...-wagon-review/
There's launch control, too, and Audi claims 3.6 seconds to hit 62 mph, which my drive partner and I were able to achieve via the RS6's built-in performance recorder (you can also measure the quarter mile and g forces). To be fair, we were pointed slightly downhill, though we did have two people in the car. Once Audi gets a car to the MotorTrend test team, I'd guess we'll see 0-60 times in the (very) low 3-second range.
I like neat cars.
Very interesting. I’ve never much been into P Cars but 140k for a 3s sports car makes them a contender in my books. Especially considering the trash that seems to be coming out of everyone else (next gen C63 and M3/4’s) lately.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I looked at them until I discovered the AMG GT....then I stopped looking at them.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If you want a 3 season or even 4 season car, then the C4S makes a lot of sense. I don't need that, so I didn't find them to be a great value. The 911 is also pretty much a GT car now in terms of size and bulk - whether that's good or bad depends on your requirements. Although I don't give a shit about 0-60 or 1/4 mile or whatever bench numbers people seem to think are important for some reason.
The last of this cars everyday pics for the year =( I don’t wanna make a thread so I’ll post some info here haha
Got dual exhaust done with X pipe and flow master 44’s with turn downs before the axle.. this was the last tow it needed!
Glass and all exterior done.. paint matched trim and bumpers.
I’ll spill some beans..
It’s got a Scott’s hot rod subframe and front susp, mustang 2 rack and pinion, triangulated 4 link Out back all on coilovers.. it’s built so I can swap in a C4 IRS if I want though haha, that’s what it came with. Wilwood all 4 corners with custom 17x9 & 18x12 rotiforms, narrowed and Built 12 bolt, LQ4 6.0 built for 25psi Mates to a T56 with a McLeod RST twin disk, no turbo yet though all the parts are on a shelf in the garage.. honestly considering an LSA or LT4 instead to bump the build up that extra notch.. anyways, nothing on the car is stock or old, the list is massive what i’ve done but thats the Main stuff
Driveable just in time for winter
Those tires look fine for snow. Don't be a wimp.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
All fair points for sure. I really don’t know what I want these days but those numbers caught me by surprise.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Can never go wrong with a 911.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Street Slicks or studded winters? I’ll start a thread to see which people preferThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
DuratracsThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Well either way wider is better.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Totally should have your own build thread with this thing. LSA or LT4? How much power do you want to make? That LQ4 with your hair dryer should make all the power and more that you want.
Deep concave 5 spokes are the best.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
2007 GMC 2500 Duramax
1981 GMC C1500 454
So sick!
Solid work JfC, looks incredible!
^^^^ yea um.... were gonna need a build thread.
Cereal Killer.
@iambrianspilner
This car is fucking awesomeThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote